静态与动态拉伸;对非运动员体能表现的短期影响——一项随机临床试验

Shomaila Hassan Khan, Misbah Bin Ilyas, Jawad Ali, Zahid Mehmood, Raheela Kanwal, Arooba Sajjad, Kiran Khushnood
{"title":"静态与动态拉伸;对非运动员体能表现的短期影响——一项随机临床试验","authors":"Shomaila Hassan Khan, Misbah Bin Ilyas, Jawad Ali, Zahid Mehmood, Raheela Kanwal, Arooba Sajjad, Kiran Khushnood","doi":"10.52567/trehabj.v7i03.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Non-athletes have varying fitness levels, muscle characteristics, and training backgrounds, which can affect how different types of stretching exercises impact their physical performance. Objective: to compare the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on physical performance of non-athletes. A single-blinded, cross-over, randomized clinical trial was conducted at Iqra National University, Peshawar for a period of 6 months. A total of n=54 male participants were randomly allocated into group A and B. Group A performed the static stretching while group B performed dynamic stretching. The physical performance measure was endurance, agility, strength, flexibility, and balance respectively. Result: The result of two-way RMANOVA showed that both stretches had significant interaction effects between interventions and all performance measures (p<0.001) except for balance (p=0.23). The main effect showed that static stretching significantly reduced agility and balance (p<0.05), while dynamic balance improved all measures significantly (p<0.05). When comparing the mean differences of all variables, dynamic stretches showed significant improvement (p<0.05) in all variables as compared to static stretching. Conclusion: Dynamic stretch has a significant contribution to improving all physical performance measures among non-athletes if incorporated before the activity. While static stretching negatively affects the agility and balance among this population. (NCT05053490) Keywords: agility; balance; dynamic stretching; endurance; flexibility; non-athletes; physical performance; static stretching.","PeriodicalId":90985,"journal":{"name":"The open rehabilitation journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Static versus dynamic stretching; short term effects on physical performance in non-athletes- a randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Shomaila Hassan Khan, Misbah Bin Ilyas, Jawad Ali, Zahid Mehmood, Raheela Kanwal, Arooba Sajjad, Kiran Khushnood\",\"doi\":\"10.52567/trehabj.v7i03.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Non-athletes have varying fitness levels, muscle characteristics, and training backgrounds, which can affect how different types of stretching exercises impact their physical performance. Objective: to compare the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on physical performance of non-athletes. A single-blinded, cross-over, randomized clinical trial was conducted at Iqra National University, Peshawar for a period of 6 months. A total of n=54 male participants were randomly allocated into group A and B. Group A performed the static stretching while group B performed dynamic stretching. The physical performance measure was endurance, agility, strength, flexibility, and balance respectively. Result: The result of two-way RMANOVA showed that both stretches had significant interaction effects between interventions and all performance measures (p<0.001) except for balance (p=0.23). The main effect showed that static stretching significantly reduced agility and balance (p<0.05), while dynamic balance improved all measures significantly (p<0.05). When comparing the mean differences of all variables, dynamic stretches showed significant improvement (p<0.05) in all variables as compared to static stretching. Conclusion: Dynamic stretch has a significant contribution to improving all physical performance measures among non-athletes if incorporated before the activity. While static stretching negatively affects the agility and balance among this population. (NCT05053490) Keywords: agility; balance; dynamic stretching; endurance; flexibility; non-athletes; physical performance; static stretching.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open rehabilitation journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open rehabilitation journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52567/trehabj.v7i03.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open rehabilitation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52567/trehabj.v7i03.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:非运动员有不同的健康水平、肌肉特征和训练背景,这可能会影响不同类型的拉伸运动对他们身体表现的影响。目的:比较静态和动态拉伸对非运动员身体机能的急性影响。在白沙瓦伊克拉国立大学进行了一项为期6个月的单盲、交叉、随机临床试验。将54名男性参与者随机分为A组和B组。A组进行静态拉伸,B组进行动态拉伸。体能测试分别是耐力、敏捷性、力量、柔韧性和平衡。结果:双向方差分析结果显示,除了平衡(p=0.23)外,两种拉伸在干预措施与所有绩效指标之间都有显著的交互作用(p<0.001)。主效应显示静态拉伸显著降低了敏捷性和平衡性(p<0.05),而动态平衡显著提高了所有指标(p<0.05)。比较各变量的平均差异,动态拉伸与静态拉伸相比,各变量均有显著改善(p<0.05)。结论:如果在活动前进行动态拉伸,对改善非运动员的所有身体性能指标有显著贡献。而静态拉伸会对这个群体的敏捷性和平衡性产生负面影响。关键词:敏捷性;平衡;动态拉伸;耐力;灵活性;普通人;物理性能;静态拉伸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Static versus dynamic stretching; short term effects on physical performance in non-athletes- a randomized clinical trial
Background: Non-athletes have varying fitness levels, muscle characteristics, and training backgrounds, which can affect how different types of stretching exercises impact their physical performance. Objective: to compare the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on physical performance of non-athletes. A single-blinded, cross-over, randomized clinical trial was conducted at Iqra National University, Peshawar for a period of 6 months. A total of n=54 male participants were randomly allocated into group A and B. Group A performed the static stretching while group B performed dynamic stretching. The physical performance measure was endurance, agility, strength, flexibility, and balance respectively. Result: The result of two-way RMANOVA showed that both stretches had significant interaction effects between interventions and all performance measures (p<0.001) except for balance (p=0.23). The main effect showed that static stretching significantly reduced agility and balance (p<0.05), while dynamic balance improved all measures significantly (p<0.05). When comparing the mean differences of all variables, dynamic stretches showed significant improvement (p<0.05) in all variables as compared to static stretching. Conclusion: Dynamic stretch has a significant contribution to improving all physical performance measures among non-athletes if incorporated before the activity. While static stretching negatively affects the agility and balance among this population. (NCT05053490) Keywords: agility; balance; dynamic stretching; endurance; flexibility; non-athletes; physical performance; static stretching.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-acceptance of low vision aids (LVADs) among patients presented to eye OPD in Poly Clinic Hospital Islamabad Effects of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder symptoms in adults: A randomized controlled trial Empowering pelvic floor rehabilitation: Unveiling technological innovations in the pelvic floor muscle chair; insights and hurdles in the pakistani context Effects of task-oriented balance training with sensory integration in post stroke patients Cases of spinal cord injury: correlation among resilience, social support and psychological well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1