不确定性对中欧和东欧国家通胀预测误差的影响

IF 2.5 Q2 ECONOMICS Eurasian Economic Review Pub Date : 2023-11-11 DOI:10.1007/s40822-023-00237-9
Agata Kliber, Magdalena Szyszko, Mariusz Próchniak, Aleksandra Rutkowska
{"title":"不确定性对中欧和东欧国家通胀预测误差的影响","authors":"Agata Kliber, Magdalena Szyszko, Mariusz Próchniak, Aleksandra Rutkowska","doi":"10.1007/s40822-023-00237-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The question underlying the research problem addressed by this study concerns various factors, including uncertainty, that could affect forecast errors. Previous works, focusing mainly on world-leading economies, are inconclusive on how economic agents form inflation forecasts or why forecast errors occur. There is a gap in the empirical literature that needs to be filled. The analysis covers the 2016–2020 period and seven economies: Albania, Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia, and Turkey. We verify whether forecast errors are driven by production, inflation, exchange rates, interest rates, oil prices, changes in the tone of the central bank’s releases and their uncertainty. We assess whether economic agents can process available information to present accurate inflation forecasts. The results suggest that neither consumers nor professionals do—they present inaccurate forecasts regularly. The results suggest that exchange rate volatility is the most important variable that positively affects forecast errors, followed by inflation and its volatility. This confirms (in most cases) a theoretical assumption that a stable environment is better for long-term development as lower inflation forecast errors allow for the optimization of economic decisions. The study implies that mechanisms supporting forecasting during turbulent times must be strengthened. It presents the set of variables that should be analyzed more carefully by consumers and professionals. In addition, central banks could provide more precise communication regarding the evolution of error drivers. Our results build on existing literature by explicitly linking macroeconomic uncertainty with forecast errors including for small open economies from Eurasia.","PeriodicalId":45064,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Economic Review","volume":"20 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of uncertainty on inflation forecast errors in Central and Eastern European countries\",\"authors\":\"Agata Kliber, Magdalena Szyszko, Mariusz Próchniak, Aleksandra Rutkowska\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40822-023-00237-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The question underlying the research problem addressed by this study concerns various factors, including uncertainty, that could affect forecast errors. Previous works, focusing mainly on world-leading economies, are inconclusive on how economic agents form inflation forecasts or why forecast errors occur. There is a gap in the empirical literature that needs to be filled. The analysis covers the 2016–2020 period and seven economies: Albania, Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia, and Turkey. We verify whether forecast errors are driven by production, inflation, exchange rates, interest rates, oil prices, changes in the tone of the central bank’s releases and their uncertainty. We assess whether economic agents can process available information to present accurate inflation forecasts. The results suggest that neither consumers nor professionals do—they present inaccurate forecasts regularly. The results suggest that exchange rate volatility is the most important variable that positively affects forecast errors, followed by inflation and its volatility. This confirms (in most cases) a theoretical assumption that a stable environment is better for long-term development as lower inflation forecast errors allow for the optimization of economic decisions. The study implies that mechanisms supporting forecasting during turbulent times must be strengthened. It presents the set of variables that should be analyzed more carefully by consumers and professionals. In addition, central banks could provide more precise communication regarding the evolution of error drivers. Our results build on existing literature by explicitly linking macroeconomic uncertainty with forecast errors including for small open economies from Eurasia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasian Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasian Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00237-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00237-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究解决的研究问题涉及各种因素,包括不确定性,这些因素可能影响预测误差。之前的研究主要集中在世界领先的经济体,在经济主体如何形成通胀预测或预测错误为何发生方面没有定论。实证文献中有一个空白需要填补。该分析涵盖了2016-2020年期间的七个经济体:阿尔巴尼亚、捷克、匈牙利、波兰、罗马尼亚、塞尔维亚和土耳其。我们验证预测误差是否由生产、通货膨胀、汇率、利率、油价、央行发布的语气变化及其不确定性驱动。我们评估经济主体是否能够处理现有信息以提出准确的通胀预测。结果表明,无论是消费者还是专业人士都不会——他们经常给出不准确的预测。结果表明,汇率波动率是影响预测误差的最重要变量,其次是通货膨胀率及其波动率。这证实了(在大多数情况下)一个理论假设,即稳定的环境更有利于长期发展,因为较低的通胀预测误差允许经济决策的优化。这项研究表明,必须加强在动荡时期支持预报的机制。它提出了一组变数,消费者和专业人士应该更仔细地分析这些变数。此外,中央银行可以就错误驱动因素的演变提供更精确的沟通。我们的结果建立在现有文献的基础上,明确地将宏观经济不确定性与预测误差联系起来,包括欧亚大陆的小型开放经济体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of uncertainty on inflation forecast errors in Central and Eastern European countries
Abstract The question underlying the research problem addressed by this study concerns various factors, including uncertainty, that could affect forecast errors. Previous works, focusing mainly on world-leading economies, are inconclusive on how economic agents form inflation forecasts or why forecast errors occur. There is a gap in the empirical literature that needs to be filled. The analysis covers the 2016–2020 period and seven economies: Albania, Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia, and Turkey. We verify whether forecast errors are driven by production, inflation, exchange rates, interest rates, oil prices, changes in the tone of the central bank’s releases and their uncertainty. We assess whether economic agents can process available information to present accurate inflation forecasts. The results suggest that neither consumers nor professionals do—they present inaccurate forecasts regularly. The results suggest that exchange rate volatility is the most important variable that positively affects forecast errors, followed by inflation and its volatility. This confirms (in most cases) a theoretical assumption that a stable environment is better for long-term development as lower inflation forecast errors allow for the optimization of economic decisions. The study implies that mechanisms supporting forecasting during turbulent times must be strengthened. It presents the set of variables that should be analyzed more carefully by consumers and professionals. In addition, central banks could provide more precise communication regarding the evolution of error drivers. Our results build on existing literature by explicitly linking macroeconomic uncertainty with forecast errors including for small open economies from Eurasia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The mission of Eurasian Economic Review is to publish peer-reviewed empirical research papers that test, extend, or build theory and contribute to practice. All empirical methods - including, but not limited to, qualitative, quantitative, field, laboratory, and any combination of methods - are welcome. Empirical, theoretical and methodological articles from all fields of finance and applied macroeconomics are featured in the journal. Theoretical and/or review articles that integrate existing bodies of research and that provide new insights into the field are highly encouraged. The journal has a broad scope, addressing such issues as: financial systems and regulation, corporate and start-up finance, macro and sustainable finance, finance and innovation, consumer finance, public policies on financial markets within local, regional, national and international contexts, money and banking, and the interface of labor and financial economics. The macroeconomics coverage includes topics from monetary economics, labor economics, international economics and development economics. Eurasian Economic Review is published quarterly. To be published in Eurasian Economic Review, a manuscript must make strong empirical and/or theoretical contributions and highlight the significance of those contributions to our field. Consequently, preference is given to submissions that test, extend, or build strong theoretical frameworks while empirically examining issues with high importance for theory and practice. Eurasian Economic Review is not tied to any national context. Although it focuses on Europe and Asia, all papers from related fields on any region or country are highly encouraged. Single country studies, cross-country or regional studies can be submitted.
期刊最新文献
The response of oil-importing and oil-exporting countries’ macroeconomic aggregates to crude oil price shocks: some international evidence Non-parametric evidence on the determinants of access to financial services in the countries of the Organization of Turkic States Firm-specific attributes and capital gains overhang Balancing financial stability and economic growth: a comprehensive analysis of macroprudential regulation Sustainability and the domestic credit market: worldwide evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1