医学专家的认可未能减少英国居民对疫苗的犹豫

Folco Panizza, Piero Ronzani, Carlo Martini, Lucia Savadori, Matteo Motterlini
{"title":"医学专家的认可未能减少英国居民对疫苗的犹豫","authors":"Folco Panizza, Piero Ronzani, Carlo Martini, Lucia Savadori, Matteo Motterlini","doi":"10.36850/e15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this report we outline the null findings of a pre-registered experiment on vaccine hesitancy in the United Kingdom. The experiment targeted vaccine misconceptions common among participants by presenting a correction to such claims endorsed by a group of medical experts. The experiment had the aim to increase vaccination intention and actual uptake during the 2021 COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Our results revealed that, contrary to a similar study conducted with Italian residents, our intervention was unsuccessful in changing participants’ attitudes and behaviour towards COVID-19 vaccines. The report concludes with a discussion of the potential reasons for these null findings.","PeriodicalId":471449,"journal":{"name":"Journal of trial and error","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Expert Endorsement Fails to Reduce Vaccine Hesitancy in U.K. Residents\",\"authors\":\"Folco Panizza, Piero Ronzani, Carlo Martini, Lucia Savadori, Matteo Motterlini\",\"doi\":\"10.36850/e15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this report we outline the null findings of a pre-registered experiment on vaccine hesitancy in the United Kingdom. The experiment targeted vaccine misconceptions common among participants by presenting a correction to such claims endorsed by a group of medical experts. The experiment had the aim to increase vaccination intention and actual uptake during the 2021 COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Our results revealed that, contrary to a similar study conducted with Italian residents, our intervention was unsuccessful in changing participants’ attitudes and behaviour towards COVID-19 vaccines. The report concludes with a discussion of the potential reasons for these null findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":471449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of trial and error\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of trial and error\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36850/e15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of trial and error","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36850/e15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本报告中,我们概述了英国一项关于疫苗犹豫的预先注册实验的无效结果。该实验通过对一组医学专家认可的说法进行纠正,针对参与者中常见的疫苗误解。该实验旨在提高2021年COVID-19疫苗接种运动期间的疫苗接种意愿和实际接种率。我们的研究结果显示,与意大利居民进行的类似研究相反,我们的干预措施未能改变参与者对COVID-19疫苗的态度和行为。报告最后讨论了这些无效发现的潜在原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medical Expert Endorsement Fails to Reduce Vaccine Hesitancy in U.K. Residents
In this report we outline the null findings of a pre-registered experiment on vaccine hesitancy in the United Kingdom. The experiment targeted vaccine misconceptions common among participants by presenting a correction to such claims endorsed by a group of medical experts. The experiment had the aim to increase vaccination intention and actual uptake during the 2021 COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Our results revealed that, contrary to a similar study conducted with Italian residents, our intervention was unsuccessful in changing participants’ attitudes and behaviour towards COVID-19 vaccines. The report concludes with a discussion of the potential reasons for these null findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smile, You’re on Camera: Investigating the Relationship between Selfie Smiles and Distress Reflections on the Unintended Consequences of the Science Reform Movement Issues in Clinical Studies Leading to Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) Negative Decisions Reputation Without Practice? A Dynamic Computational Model of the Unintended Consequences of Open Scientist Reputations "Not again": When the Therapist Resists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1