为具有强相关性的高维基因组数据选择稳定的变量

Q1 Decision Sciences Annals of Data Science Pub Date : 2023-06-29 DOI:10.1007/s40745-023-00481-5
Reetika Sarkar, Sithija Manage, Xiaoli Gao
{"title":"为具有强相关性的高维基因组数据选择稳定的变量","authors":"Reetika Sarkar,&nbsp;Sithija Manage,&nbsp;Xiaoli Gao","doi":"10.1007/s40745-023-00481-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High-dimensional genomic data studies are often found to exhibit strong correlations, which results in instability and inconsistency in the estimates obtained using commonly used regularization approaches including the Lasso and MCP, etc. In this paper, we perform comparative study of regularization approaches for variable selection under different correlation structures and propose a two-stage procedure named rPGBS to address the issue of stable variable selection in various strong correlation settings. This approach involves repeatedly running a two-stage hierarchical approach consisting of a random pseudo-group clustering and bi-level variable selection. Extensive simulation studies and high-dimensional genomic data analysis on real datasets have demonstrated the advantage of the proposed rPGBS method over some of the most used regularization methods. In particular, rPGBS results in more stable selection of variables across a variety of correlation settings, as compared to some recent methods addressing variable selection with strong correlations: Precision Lasso (Wang et al. in Bioinformatics 35:1181–1187, 2019) and Whitening Lasso (Zhu et al. in Bioinformatics 37:2238–2244, 2021). Moreover, rPGBS has been shown to be computationally efficient across various settings.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36280,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Data Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stable Variable Selection for High-Dimensional Genomic Data with Strong Correlations\",\"authors\":\"Reetika Sarkar,&nbsp;Sithija Manage,&nbsp;Xiaoli Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40745-023-00481-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>High-dimensional genomic data studies are often found to exhibit strong correlations, which results in instability and inconsistency in the estimates obtained using commonly used regularization approaches including the Lasso and MCP, etc. In this paper, we perform comparative study of regularization approaches for variable selection under different correlation structures and propose a two-stage procedure named rPGBS to address the issue of stable variable selection in various strong correlation settings. This approach involves repeatedly running a two-stage hierarchical approach consisting of a random pseudo-group clustering and bi-level variable selection. Extensive simulation studies and high-dimensional genomic data analysis on real datasets have demonstrated the advantage of the proposed rPGBS method over some of the most used regularization methods. In particular, rPGBS results in more stable selection of variables across a variety of correlation settings, as compared to some recent methods addressing variable selection with strong correlations: Precision Lasso (Wang et al. in Bioinformatics 35:1181–1187, 2019) and Whitening Lasso (Zhu et al. in Bioinformatics 37:2238–2244, 2021). Moreover, rPGBS has been shown to be computationally efficient across various settings.\\n</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Data Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40745-023-00481-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40745-023-00481-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高维基因组数据研究通常表现出强相关性,这导致使用常用正则化方法(包括 Lasso 和 MCP 等)获得的估计值不稳定、不一致。在本文中,我们对不同相关性结构下的变量选择正则化方法进行了比较研究,并提出了一种名为 rPGBS 的两阶段程序,以解决各种强相关性环境下的稳定变量选择问题。这种方法包括重复运行由随机伪组聚类和双级变量选择组成的两阶段分层方法。对真实数据集进行的大量模拟研究和高维基因组数据分析表明,与一些最常用的正则化方法相比,所提出的 rPGBS 方法更具优势。特别是,与最近一些处理强相关性变量选择的方法相比,rPGBS 在各种相关性设置下都能实现更稳定的变量选择:Precision Lasso(Wang 等人,载于《生物信息学》35:1181-1187,2019 年)和 Whitening Lasso(Zhu 等人,载于《生物信息学》37:2238-2244,2021 年)。此外,rPGBS 已被证明在各种环境下都具有计算效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stable Variable Selection for High-Dimensional Genomic Data with Strong Correlations

High-dimensional genomic data studies are often found to exhibit strong correlations, which results in instability and inconsistency in the estimates obtained using commonly used regularization approaches including the Lasso and MCP, etc. In this paper, we perform comparative study of regularization approaches for variable selection under different correlation structures and propose a two-stage procedure named rPGBS to address the issue of stable variable selection in various strong correlation settings. This approach involves repeatedly running a two-stage hierarchical approach consisting of a random pseudo-group clustering and bi-level variable selection. Extensive simulation studies and high-dimensional genomic data analysis on real datasets have demonstrated the advantage of the proposed rPGBS method over some of the most used regularization methods. In particular, rPGBS results in more stable selection of variables across a variety of correlation settings, as compared to some recent methods addressing variable selection with strong correlations: Precision Lasso (Wang et al. in Bioinformatics 35:1181–1187, 2019) and Whitening Lasso (Zhu et al. in Bioinformatics 37:2238–2244, 2021). Moreover, rPGBS has been shown to be computationally efficient across various settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Data Science
Annals of Data Science Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Annals of Data Science (ADS) publishes cutting-edge research findings, experimental results and case studies of data science. Although Data Science is regarded as an interdisciplinary field of using mathematics, statistics, databases, data mining, high-performance computing, knowledge management and virtualization to discover knowledge from Big Data, it should have its own scientific contents, such as axioms, laws and rules, which are fundamentally important for experts in different fields to explore their own interests from Big Data. ADS encourages contributors to address such challenging problems at this exchange platform. At present, how to discover knowledge from heterogeneous data under Big Data environment needs to be addressed.     ADS is a series of volumes edited by either the editorial office or guest editors. Guest editors will be responsible for call-for-papers and the review process for high-quality contributions in their volumes.
期刊最新文献
Non-negative Sparse Matrix Factorization for Soft Clustering of Territory Risk Analysis Kernel Method for Estimating Matusita Overlapping Coefficient Using Numerical Approximations Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Generalized Inflated Power Series Distributions Farm-Level Smart Crop Recommendation Framework Using Machine Learning Reaction Function for Financial Market Reacting to Events or Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1