{"title":"自由放任式叙事:约书亚·奥本海默纪录片《杀戮演绎》中的虚构、后事实和电影声音","authors":"Alexander Scherr","doi":"10.5325/style.57.3.0296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Based on a rhetorical-narratological analysis of Joshua Oppenheimer’s film The Act of Killing (2012), this article identifies a specific use of the filmic voice which it defines as ‘laissez-faire storytelling.’ The laissez-faire voice is a rhetorical stance that serves documentary filmmakers to reconfigure their narrative position toward actors who espouse a ‘post-factual’ worldview. Directors who employ this stance strategically grant their actors a considerable amount of freedom in the making of the documentary. Ultimately, however, their technique exposes a problematic rhetoric in which the borderline between fictionality and non-fictionality is obliterated. The article concludes that the laissez-faire documentary resonates strongly with current attempts in both theory and art to restabilize the precarious boundaries between fictionality and non-fictionality—a reorientation that is decidedly ‘post-postmodernist.’","PeriodicalId":45300,"journal":{"name":"STYLE","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laissez-Faire Storytelling: Fictionality, Post-Factuality, and the Filmic Voice in Joshua Oppenheimer’s Documentary <i>The Act of Killing</i> (2012)\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Scherr\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/style.57.3.0296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Based on a rhetorical-narratological analysis of Joshua Oppenheimer’s film The Act of Killing (2012), this article identifies a specific use of the filmic voice which it defines as ‘laissez-faire storytelling.’ The laissez-faire voice is a rhetorical stance that serves documentary filmmakers to reconfigure their narrative position toward actors who espouse a ‘post-factual’ worldview. Directors who employ this stance strategically grant their actors a considerable amount of freedom in the making of the documentary. Ultimately, however, their technique exposes a problematic rhetoric in which the borderline between fictionality and non-fictionality is obliterated. The article concludes that the laissez-faire documentary resonates strongly with current attempts in both theory and art to restabilize the precarious boundaries between fictionality and non-fictionality—a reorientation that is decidedly ‘post-postmodernist.’\",\"PeriodicalId\":45300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STYLE\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STYLE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/style.57.3.0296\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STYLE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/style.57.3.0296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Laissez-Faire Storytelling: Fictionality, Post-Factuality, and the Filmic Voice in Joshua Oppenheimer’s Documentary The Act of Killing (2012)
ABSTRACT Based on a rhetorical-narratological analysis of Joshua Oppenheimer’s film The Act of Killing (2012), this article identifies a specific use of the filmic voice which it defines as ‘laissez-faire storytelling.’ The laissez-faire voice is a rhetorical stance that serves documentary filmmakers to reconfigure their narrative position toward actors who espouse a ‘post-factual’ worldview. Directors who employ this stance strategically grant their actors a considerable amount of freedom in the making of the documentary. Ultimately, however, their technique exposes a problematic rhetoric in which the borderline between fictionality and non-fictionality is obliterated. The article concludes that the laissez-faire documentary resonates strongly with current attempts in both theory and art to restabilize the precarious boundaries between fictionality and non-fictionality—a reorientation that is decidedly ‘post-postmodernist.’
期刊介绍:
Style invites submissions that address questions of style, stylistics, and poetics, including research and theory in discourse analysis, literary and nonliterary genres, narrative, figuration, metrics, rhetorical analysis, and the pedagogy of style. Contributions may draw from such fields as literary criticism, critical theory, computational linguistics, cognitive linguistics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric and writing studies. In addition, Style publishes reviews, review-essays, surveys, interviews, translations, enumerative and annotated bibliographies, and reports on conferences.