moliere第三共和国。brunetiere案例

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE STUDI FRANCESI Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.4000/studifrancesi.53555
Francesco Fiorentino
{"title":"moliere第三共和国。brunetiere案例","authors":"Francesco Fiorentino","doi":"10.4000/studifrancesi.53555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the aftermath of the Battle of Sedan, Molière was elected declared patron and consoler of the defeated homeland. In the conference at the Odéon-Théâtre, Ferdinand Brunetière initiated a debate about the interpretation of Molière’s comedies, in particular about Tartuffe and L’École des femmes. The controversy between catholic and laic critics is vivid even though there is an ideological consonance between the participating critics.","PeriodicalId":41340,"journal":{"name":"STUDI FRANCESI","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molière Troisième République. Le cas Brunetière\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Fiorentino\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/studifrancesi.53555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the aftermath of the Battle of Sedan, Molière was elected declared patron and consoler of the defeated homeland. In the conference at the Odéon-Théâtre, Ferdinand Brunetière initiated a debate about the interpretation of Molière’s comedies, in particular about Tartuffe and L’École des femmes. The controversy between catholic and laic critics is vivid even though there is an ideological consonance between the participating critics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDI FRANCESI\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDI FRANCESI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/studifrancesi.53555\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, ROMANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDI FRANCESI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/studifrancesi.53555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

色当战役结束后,莫里埃尔被选为被击败的祖国的赞助人和安慰者。在奥德赛-萨姆萨姆会议上,费迪南德·布鲁内蒂特发起了一场关于莫里特喜剧的解释的辩论,特别是关于塔尔图夫和École des femmes。尽管参与批评的人在意识形态上是一致的,但天主教批评家和世俗批评家之间的争论是生动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Molière Troisième République. Le cas Brunetière
In the aftermath of the Battle of Sedan, Molière was elected declared patron and consoler of the defeated homeland. In the conference at the Odéon-Théâtre, Ferdinand Brunetière initiated a debate about the interpretation of Molière’s comedies, in particular about Tartuffe and L’École des femmes. The controversy between catholic and laic critics is vivid even though there is an ideological consonance between the participating critics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
STUDI FRANCESI
STUDI FRANCESI LITERATURE, ROMANCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊最新文献
Héllenistes français, dir. Romain Menini Lieux de mémoire et océan. Géographie littéraire de la mémoire transatlantique aux xxe et xxie siècles, sous En regardant voler les mouches. Arts, littérature et attention Agnès Kettler, Chateaubriand diplomate Luca Pierdominici, De la scandaleuse liberté en pensée et en parole chez Marguerite Porete
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1