{"title":"moliere第三共和国。brunetiere案例","authors":"Francesco Fiorentino","doi":"10.4000/studifrancesi.53555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the aftermath of the Battle of Sedan, Molière was elected declared patron and consoler of the defeated homeland. In the conference at the Odéon-Théâtre, Ferdinand Brunetière initiated a debate about the interpretation of Molière’s comedies, in particular about Tartuffe and L’École des femmes. The controversy between catholic and laic critics is vivid even though there is an ideological consonance between the participating critics.","PeriodicalId":41340,"journal":{"name":"STUDI FRANCESI","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molière Troisième République. Le cas Brunetière\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Fiorentino\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/studifrancesi.53555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the aftermath of the Battle of Sedan, Molière was elected declared patron and consoler of the defeated homeland. In the conference at the Odéon-Théâtre, Ferdinand Brunetière initiated a debate about the interpretation of Molière’s comedies, in particular about Tartuffe and L’École des femmes. The controversy between catholic and laic critics is vivid even though there is an ideological consonance between the participating critics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDI FRANCESI\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDI FRANCESI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/studifrancesi.53555\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, ROMANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDI FRANCESI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/studifrancesi.53555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
色当战役结束后,莫里埃尔被选为被击败的祖国的赞助人和安慰者。在奥德赛-萨姆萨姆会议上,费迪南德·布鲁内蒂特发起了一场关于莫里特喜剧的解释的辩论,特别是关于塔尔图夫和École des femmes。尽管参与批评的人在意识形态上是一致的,但天主教批评家和世俗批评家之间的争论是生动的。
In the aftermath of the Battle of Sedan, Molière was elected declared patron and consoler of the defeated homeland. In the conference at the Odéon-Théâtre, Ferdinand Brunetière initiated a debate about the interpretation of Molière’s comedies, in particular about Tartuffe and L’École des femmes. The controversy between catholic and laic critics is vivid even though there is an ideological consonance between the participating critics.