目标驱动镇静方案对儿童重症监护病房呼吸机解放的影响:实施前后单中心研究

IF 0.5 Q4 PEDIATRICS Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1774306
Abdulla Alfraij, Ahmed Abdelmoniem, Mohammad Surour, Mohamed Basuni, Mohamed Elseadawy
{"title":"目标驱动镇静方案对儿童重症监护病房呼吸机解放的影响:实施前后单中心研究","authors":"Abdulla Alfraij, Ahmed Abdelmoniem, Mohammad Surour, Mohamed Basuni, Mohamed Elseadawy","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1774306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Oversedation of mechanically ventilated children is common in many pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). This practice is driven by the challenges of dealing with children of different ages as they have different behavioral, mental, and emotional statuses. We aimed to evaluate the effect of implementing a target-driven sedation protocol in the PICU on ventilator-free days (VFDs), PICU stays, and hospitalization. A 2-year retrospective cohort study was performed in our PICU between October 1, 2018, and October 1, 2020. All intubated children up to 12 years of age were included. Descriptive analyses and a pre- and postintervention comparison of VFDs and length of stay were used to assess the protocol's effectiveness. A total of 134 patients were studied. There was a significant increase in VFDs in cases with respiratory illness requiring mechanical ventilation after implementing this protocol (19.9 vs. 22.3, respectively, with a p-value of 0.031). Also, there was a trend of reduction in the length of PICU stay (median of 9 vs. 8 days, p = 0.816), post-PICU length of stay (median of 4 vs. 3 days, p = 0.055), and hospitalization duration (median of 16 vs. 13 days, p = 0.062) though not statistically significant. Implementing a target-driven sedation protocol in the PICU significantly affects VFDs in mechanically ventilated respiratory cases. Though inconclusive in our study, implementing such a protocol will influence patients' care and reduce unnecessary sedation uses that will reduce sedation hazards.","PeriodicalId":44426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Target-Driven Sedation Protocol to Ventilator Liberation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Pre- and Postimplementation Single-Center Study\",\"authors\":\"Abdulla Alfraij, Ahmed Abdelmoniem, Mohammad Surour, Mohamed Basuni, Mohamed Elseadawy\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1774306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Oversedation of mechanically ventilated children is common in many pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). This practice is driven by the challenges of dealing with children of different ages as they have different behavioral, mental, and emotional statuses. We aimed to evaluate the effect of implementing a target-driven sedation protocol in the PICU on ventilator-free days (VFDs), PICU stays, and hospitalization. A 2-year retrospective cohort study was performed in our PICU between October 1, 2018, and October 1, 2020. All intubated children up to 12 years of age were included. Descriptive analyses and a pre- and postintervention comparison of VFDs and length of stay were used to assess the protocol's effectiveness. A total of 134 patients were studied. There was a significant increase in VFDs in cases with respiratory illness requiring mechanical ventilation after implementing this protocol (19.9 vs. 22.3, respectively, with a p-value of 0.031). Also, there was a trend of reduction in the length of PICU stay (median of 9 vs. 8 days, p = 0.816), post-PICU length of stay (median of 4 vs. 3 days, p = 0.055), and hospitalization duration (median of 16 vs. 13 days, p = 0.062) though not statistically significant. Implementing a target-driven sedation protocol in the PICU significantly affects VFDs in mechanically ventilated respiratory cases. Though inconclusive in our study, implementing such a protocol will influence patients' care and reduce unnecessary sedation uses that will reduce sedation hazards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1774306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1774306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机械通气儿童的过度镇静在许多儿科重症监护病房(picu)中很常见。由于不同年龄的孩子有不同的行为、心理和情感状态,所以这种做法是由处理他们的挑战所驱动的。我们的目的是评估在PICU中实施目标驱动镇静方案对无呼吸机天数(vfd)、PICU停留时间和住院的影响。2018年10月1日至2020年10月1日在PICU进行了一项为期2年的回顾性队列研究。所有12岁以下插管儿童均包括在内。描述性分析和干预前后vfd和住院时间的比较用于评估方案的有效性。共研究了134例患者。实施该方案后,需要机械通气的呼吸系统疾病患者的vfd显著增加(分别为19.9 vs. 22.3, p值为0.031)。PICU住院时间(中位数为9天对8天,p = 0.816)、PICU后住院时间(中位数为4天对3天,p = 0.055)和住院时间(中位数为16天对13天,p = 0.062)均有减少的趋势,但无统计学意义。在PICU中实施目标驱动镇静方案可显著影响机械通气呼吸病例的vfd。虽然我们的研究尚无定论,但实施这样的方案将影响患者的护理,减少不必要的镇静使用,从而减少镇静危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Target-Driven Sedation Protocol to Ventilator Liberation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Pre- and Postimplementation Single-Center Study
Abstract Oversedation of mechanically ventilated children is common in many pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). This practice is driven by the challenges of dealing with children of different ages as they have different behavioral, mental, and emotional statuses. We aimed to evaluate the effect of implementing a target-driven sedation protocol in the PICU on ventilator-free days (VFDs), PICU stays, and hospitalization. A 2-year retrospective cohort study was performed in our PICU between October 1, 2018, and October 1, 2020. All intubated children up to 12 years of age were included. Descriptive analyses and a pre- and postintervention comparison of VFDs and length of stay were used to assess the protocol's effectiveness. A total of 134 patients were studied. There was a significant increase in VFDs in cases with respiratory illness requiring mechanical ventilation after implementing this protocol (19.9 vs. 22.3, respectively, with a p-value of 0.031). Also, there was a trend of reduction in the length of PICU stay (median of 9 vs. 8 days, p = 0.816), post-PICU length of stay (median of 4 vs. 3 days, p = 0.055), and hospitalization duration (median of 16 vs. 13 days, p = 0.062) though not statistically significant. Implementing a target-driven sedation protocol in the PICU significantly affects VFDs in mechanically ventilated respiratory cases. Though inconclusive in our study, implementing such a protocol will influence patients' care and reduce unnecessary sedation uses that will reduce sedation hazards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Harms Associated with Tracheal Reintubation After Unplanned Extubation: A Retrospective Cohort Study Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Scores in Children who Received Early Life Mechanical Ventilation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit “It Would Be All-Consuming”: Community Parents' Perceptions of the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Rescue Therapy in Pediatric Bupropion Cardiotoxicity Social Disadvantage and Inequity in Access to Pediatric Critical Care Services for Children Living Remote from a Children's Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1