{"title":"接力翻译与南南想象:以伊克巴尔在中国为例","authors":"Gal Gvili, Sumaira Nawaz","doi":"10.1080/14649373.2023.2242151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the translation and reception of the poetry of Muhammad Iqbal—a Muslim revivalist and national poet of Pakistan in China during the late 1950s era of decolonization, as part of a broader imaginary of Chinese-Pakistani solidarity in the Global South. The 1950s have seen a burst of translations of foreign literatures into Chinese, in tandem with China’s leadership position in various iterations of non-alignment during the Cold War. Most often, original literature in African and Asian languages was translated via a mediating language—in the case of South Asian languages—English. Examining the translation trajectory of Iqbal’s poems from Urdu to English to Chinese, we argue and demonstrate that the Muslim content of Iqbal’s poetry was diluted and dismissed. Closely reading the translation into Chinese of some of Iqbal’s key concepts such as “The East” (Mashriq) and “Self” (Khudi), we trace the recreation of Iqbal in English and then Chinese—from a religiously-driven poet whose anticolonialism was rooted in Sufi revivalism to a staunch anti-imperialist proponent of Pan-Asian nationalism. We aim to shine a light on the critical role relay translation plays in South-South interactions, real and imagined.","PeriodicalId":46080,"journal":{"name":"Inter-Asia Cultural Studies","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relay translation and South–South imaginary: the case of Muhammad Iqbal in China\",\"authors\":\"Gal Gvili, Sumaira Nawaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14649373.2023.2242151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the translation and reception of the poetry of Muhammad Iqbal—a Muslim revivalist and national poet of Pakistan in China during the late 1950s era of decolonization, as part of a broader imaginary of Chinese-Pakistani solidarity in the Global South. The 1950s have seen a burst of translations of foreign literatures into Chinese, in tandem with China’s leadership position in various iterations of non-alignment during the Cold War. Most often, original literature in African and Asian languages was translated via a mediating language—in the case of South Asian languages—English. Examining the translation trajectory of Iqbal’s poems from Urdu to English to Chinese, we argue and demonstrate that the Muslim content of Iqbal’s poetry was diluted and dismissed. Closely reading the translation into Chinese of some of Iqbal’s key concepts such as “The East” (Mashriq) and “Self” (Khudi), we trace the recreation of Iqbal in English and then Chinese—from a religiously-driven poet whose anticolonialism was rooted in Sufi revivalism to a staunch anti-imperialist proponent of Pan-Asian nationalism. We aim to shine a light on the critical role relay translation plays in South-South interactions, real and imagined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inter-Asia Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inter-Asia Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2023.2242151\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inter-Asia Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2023.2242151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Relay translation and South–South imaginary: the case of Muhammad Iqbal in China
This article examines the translation and reception of the poetry of Muhammad Iqbal—a Muslim revivalist and national poet of Pakistan in China during the late 1950s era of decolonization, as part of a broader imaginary of Chinese-Pakistani solidarity in the Global South. The 1950s have seen a burst of translations of foreign literatures into Chinese, in tandem with China’s leadership position in various iterations of non-alignment during the Cold War. Most often, original literature in African and Asian languages was translated via a mediating language—in the case of South Asian languages—English. Examining the translation trajectory of Iqbal’s poems from Urdu to English to Chinese, we argue and demonstrate that the Muslim content of Iqbal’s poetry was diluted and dismissed. Closely reading the translation into Chinese of some of Iqbal’s key concepts such as “The East” (Mashriq) and “Self” (Khudi), we trace the recreation of Iqbal in English and then Chinese—from a religiously-driven poet whose anticolonialism was rooted in Sufi revivalism to a staunch anti-imperialist proponent of Pan-Asian nationalism. We aim to shine a light on the critical role relay translation plays in South-South interactions, real and imagined.
期刊介绍:
The cultural question is among the most important yet difficult subjects facing inter-Asia today. Throughout the 20th century, worldwide competition over capital, colonial history, and the Cold War has jeopardized interactions among cultures. Globalization of technology, regionalization of economy and the end of the Cold War have opened up a unique opportunity for cultural exchanges to take place. In response to global cultural changes, cultural studies has emerged internationally as an energetic field of scholarship. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies gives a long overdue voice, throughout the global intellectual community, to those concerned with inter-Asia processes.