蓝图:系统化的行为改变设计——社会比较理论的案例

IF 4.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.1145/3617364
Roelof A. J. de Vries, Mailin Lemke, Geke D. S. Ludden
{"title":"蓝图:系统化的行为改变设计——社会比较理论的案例","authors":"Roelof A. J. de Vries, Mailin Lemke, Geke D. S. Ludden","doi":"10.1145/3617364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To improve people’s lives, human-computer interaction researchers are increasingly designing technological solutions based on behavior change theory, such as social comparison theory. However, how researchers operationalize such a theory as a design remains largely unclear. One way to clarify this methodological step is to clearly state which functional elements of a design are aimed at operationalizing a specific behavior change theory construct to evaluate if such aims were successful. In this paper, we investigate how the operationalization of functional elements of theories and designs can be more easily conveyed. First, we present a scoping review of the literature to determine the state of operationalizations of social comparison theory as behavior change designs. Second, we introduce a new tool to facilitate the operationalization process. We term the tool: Blueprints. A blueprint explicates essential functional elements of a behavior change theory by describing it in relation to necessary , and sufficient building blocks incorporated in a design. We describe the process of developing a blueprint for social comparison theory. Lastly, we illustrate how the blueprint can be used during the design refinement and reflection process.","PeriodicalId":50917,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blueprints: Systematizing Behavior Change Designs - The Case of Social Comparison Theory\",\"authors\":\"Roelof A. J. de Vries, Mailin Lemke, Geke D. S. Ludden\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3617364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To improve people’s lives, human-computer interaction researchers are increasingly designing technological solutions based on behavior change theory, such as social comparison theory. However, how researchers operationalize such a theory as a design remains largely unclear. One way to clarify this methodological step is to clearly state which functional elements of a design are aimed at operationalizing a specific behavior change theory construct to evaluate if such aims were successful. In this paper, we investigate how the operationalization of functional elements of theories and designs can be more easily conveyed. First, we present a scoping review of the literature to determine the state of operationalizations of social comparison theory as behavior change designs. Second, we introduce a new tool to facilitate the operationalization process. We term the tool: Blueprints. A blueprint explicates essential functional elements of a behavior change theory by describing it in relation to necessary , and sufficient building blocks incorporated in a design. We describe the process of developing a blueprint for social comparison theory. Lastly, we illustrate how the blueprint can be used during the design refinement and reflection process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3617364\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3617364","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了改善人们的生活,人机交互研究人员越来越多地设计基于行为改变理论的技术解决方案,如社会比较理论。然而,研究人员如何将这种理论作为一种设计来操作,在很大程度上仍然不清楚。澄清这一方法论步骤的一种方法是清楚地说明设计的哪些功能元素旨在实现特定的行为改变理论结构,以评估这些目标是否成功。在本文中,我们探讨了如何更容易地传达理论和设计的功能元素的操作化。首先,我们对文献进行了范围审查,以确定社会比较理论作为行为改变设计的运作状态。第二,我们引入了一个新工具,以促进操作过程。我们称这个工具为:蓝图。蓝图通过描述与设计中必要和充分的构建块相关的行为改变理论,阐明了行为改变理论的基本功能元素。我们描述了发展社会比较理论蓝图的过程。最后,我们说明了如何在设计改进和反思过程中使用蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Blueprints: Systematizing Behavior Change Designs - The Case of Social Comparison Theory
To improve people’s lives, human-computer interaction researchers are increasingly designing technological solutions based on behavior change theory, such as social comparison theory. However, how researchers operationalize such a theory as a design remains largely unclear. One way to clarify this methodological step is to clearly state which functional elements of a design are aimed at operationalizing a specific behavior change theory construct to evaluate if such aims were successful. In this paper, we investigate how the operationalization of functional elements of theories and designs can be more easily conveyed. First, we present a scoping review of the literature to determine the state of operationalizations of social comparison theory as behavior change designs. Second, we introduce a new tool to facilitate the operationalization process. We term the tool: Blueprints. A blueprint explicates essential functional elements of a behavior change theory by describing it in relation to necessary , and sufficient building blocks incorporated in a design. We describe the process of developing a blueprint for social comparison theory. Lastly, we illustrate how the blueprint can be used during the design refinement and reflection process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
94
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This ACM Transaction seeks to be the premier archival journal in the multidisciplinary field of human-computer interaction. Since its first issue in March 1994, it has presented work of the highest scientific quality that contributes to the practice in the present and future. The primary emphasis is on results of broad application, but the journal considers original work focused on specific domains, on special requirements, on ethical issues -- the full range of design, development, and use of interactive systems.
期刊最新文献
Unmaking electronic waste Household Wattch: Exploring opportunities for surveillance and consent through families’ household energy use data Self-Determination Theory and HCI Games Research: Unfulfilled Promises and Unquestioned Paradigms Naturalistic Digital Behavior Predicts Cognitive Abilities GUI Behaviors to Minimize Pointing-based Interaction Interferences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1