Diana R. Stovern, Thomas M. Hamill, Lesley L. Smith
{"title":"利用长时间序列再预报和降水再分析改进国家混合模式的概率降水预报。第二部分:结果","authors":"Diana R. Stovern, Thomas M. Hamill, Lesley L. Smith","doi":"10.1175/mwr-d-22-0310.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This second part of the series presents results from verifying a precipitation forecast calibration method discussed in the first part, based on quantile mapping (QM), weighting of sorted members, and dressing of the ensemble. NOAA’s Global Ensemble Forecast System, version 12 (GEFSv12), reforecasts were used in this study. The method was validated with preoperational GEFSv12 forecasts from December 2017 to November 2019. The method is proposed as an enhancement for GEFSv12 precipitation postprocessing in NOAA’s National Blend of Models. The first part described adaptations to the methodology to leverage the ∼20-yr GEFSv12 reforecast data. As shown here in this part, when compared with probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts from the raw ensemble, the adapted method produced downscaled, high-resolution forecasts that were significantly more reliable and skillful than raw ensemble-derived probabilities, especially at shorter lead times (i.e., <5 days) and for forecasts of events from light precipitation to >10 mm (6 h) −1 . Cool-season events in the western United States were especially improved when the QM algorithm was applied, providing a statistical downscaling with realistic smaller-scale detail related to terrain features. The method provided less value added for forecasts of longer lead times and for the heaviest precipitation.","PeriodicalId":18824,"journal":{"name":"Monthly Weather Review","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving National Blend of Models Probabilistic Precipitation Forecasts Using Long Time Series of Reforecasts and Precipitation Reanalyses. Part II: Results\",\"authors\":\"Diana R. Stovern, Thomas M. Hamill, Lesley L. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/mwr-d-22-0310.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This second part of the series presents results from verifying a precipitation forecast calibration method discussed in the first part, based on quantile mapping (QM), weighting of sorted members, and dressing of the ensemble. NOAA’s Global Ensemble Forecast System, version 12 (GEFSv12), reforecasts were used in this study. The method was validated with preoperational GEFSv12 forecasts from December 2017 to November 2019. The method is proposed as an enhancement for GEFSv12 precipitation postprocessing in NOAA’s National Blend of Models. The first part described adaptations to the methodology to leverage the ∼20-yr GEFSv12 reforecast data. As shown here in this part, when compared with probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts from the raw ensemble, the adapted method produced downscaled, high-resolution forecasts that were significantly more reliable and skillful than raw ensemble-derived probabilities, especially at shorter lead times (i.e., <5 days) and for forecasts of events from light precipitation to >10 mm (6 h) −1 . Cool-season events in the western United States were especially improved when the QM algorithm was applied, providing a statistical downscaling with realistic smaller-scale detail related to terrain features. The method provided less value added for forecasts of longer lead times and for the heaviest precipitation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monthly Weather Review\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monthly Weather Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-22-0310.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monthly Weather Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-22-0310.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving National Blend of Models Probabilistic Precipitation Forecasts Using Long Time Series of Reforecasts and Precipitation Reanalyses. Part II: Results
Abstract This second part of the series presents results from verifying a precipitation forecast calibration method discussed in the first part, based on quantile mapping (QM), weighting of sorted members, and dressing of the ensemble. NOAA’s Global Ensemble Forecast System, version 12 (GEFSv12), reforecasts were used in this study. The method was validated with preoperational GEFSv12 forecasts from December 2017 to November 2019. The method is proposed as an enhancement for GEFSv12 precipitation postprocessing in NOAA’s National Blend of Models. The first part described adaptations to the methodology to leverage the ∼20-yr GEFSv12 reforecast data. As shown here in this part, when compared with probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts from the raw ensemble, the adapted method produced downscaled, high-resolution forecasts that were significantly more reliable and skillful than raw ensemble-derived probabilities, especially at shorter lead times (i.e., <5 days) and for forecasts of events from light precipitation to >10 mm (6 h) −1 . Cool-season events in the western United States were especially improved when the QM algorithm was applied, providing a statistical downscaling with realistic smaller-scale detail related to terrain features. The method provided less value added for forecasts of longer lead times and for the heaviest precipitation.
期刊介绍:
Monthly Weather Review (MWR) (ISSN: 0027-0644; eISSN: 1520-0493) publishes research relevant to the analysis and prediction of observed atmospheric circulations and physics, including technique development, data assimilation, model validation, and relevant case studies. This research includes numerical and data assimilation techniques that apply to the atmosphere and/or ocean environments. MWR also addresses phenomena having seasonal and subseasonal time scales.