利用长时间序列再预报和降水再分析改进国家混合模式的概率降水预报。第二部分:结果

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Monthly Weather Review Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1175/mwr-d-22-0310.1
Diana R. Stovern, Thomas M. Hamill, Lesley L. Smith
{"title":"利用长时间序列再预报和降水再分析改进国家混合模式的概率降水预报。第二部分:结果","authors":"Diana R. Stovern, Thomas M. Hamill, Lesley L. Smith","doi":"10.1175/mwr-d-22-0310.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This second part of the series presents results from verifying a precipitation forecast calibration method discussed in the first part, based on quantile mapping (QM), weighting of sorted members, and dressing of the ensemble. NOAA’s Global Ensemble Forecast System, version 12 (GEFSv12), reforecasts were used in this study. The method was validated with preoperational GEFSv12 forecasts from December 2017 to November 2019. The method is proposed as an enhancement for GEFSv12 precipitation postprocessing in NOAA’s National Blend of Models. The first part described adaptations to the methodology to leverage the ∼20-yr GEFSv12 reforecast data. As shown here in this part, when compared with probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts from the raw ensemble, the adapted method produced downscaled, high-resolution forecasts that were significantly more reliable and skillful than raw ensemble-derived probabilities, especially at shorter lead times (i.e., <5 days) and for forecasts of events from light precipitation to >10 mm (6 h) −1 . Cool-season events in the western United States were especially improved when the QM algorithm was applied, providing a statistical downscaling with realistic smaller-scale detail related to terrain features. The method provided less value added for forecasts of longer lead times and for the heaviest precipitation.","PeriodicalId":18824,"journal":{"name":"Monthly Weather Review","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving National Blend of Models Probabilistic Precipitation Forecasts Using Long Time Series of Reforecasts and Precipitation Reanalyses. Part II: Results\",\"authors\":\"Diana R. Stovern, Thomas M. Hamill, Lesley L. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/mwr-d-22-0310.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This second part of the series presents results from verifying a precipitation forecast calibration method discussed in the first part, based on quantile mapping (QM), weighting of sorted members, and dressing of the ensemble. NOAA’s Global Ensemble Forecast System, version 12 (GEFSv12), reforecasts were used in this study. The method was validated with preoperational GEFSv12 forecasts from December 2017 to November 2019. The method is proposed as an enhancement for GEFSv12 precipitation postprocessing in NOAA’s National Blend of Models. The first part described adaptations to the methodology to leverage the ∼20-yr GEFSv12 reforecast data. As shown here in this part, when compared with probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts from the raw ensemble, the adapted method produced downscaled, high-resolution forecasts that were significantly more reliable and skillful than raw ensemble-derived probabilities, especially at shorter lead times (i.e., <5 days) and for forecasts of events from light precipitation to >10 mm (6 h) −1 . Cool-season events in the western United States were especially improved when the QM algorithm was applied, providing a statistical downscaling with realistic smaller-scale detail related to terrain features. The method provided less value added for forecasts of longer lead times and for the heaviest precipitation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monthly Weather Review\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monthly Weather Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-22-0310.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monthly Weather Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-22-0310.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本系列的第二部分介绍了第一部分中讨论的基于分位数映射(QM)、排序成员权重和集合修饰的降水预报校准方法的验证结果。本研究使用了NOAA的全球综合预报系统第12版(GEFSv12)进行再预报。利用2017年12月至2019年11月的GEFSv12预估数据对该方法进行了验证。该方法是对NOAA国家混合模式中GEFSv12降水后处理的增强。第一部分描述了利用~ 20年GEFSv12重预测数据对方法的适应性。如本部分所示,与原始集合的概率定量降水预报相比,调整后的方法产生的低尺度、高分辨率预报明显比原始集合的概率预报更可靠、更熟练,特别是在较短的预期(即5天)和从轻微降水到10毫米(6小时)−1的事件预报。当应用QM算法时,美国西部的冷季事件得到了特别的改善,提供了与地形特征相关的逼真的小尺度细节的统计降尺度。该方法对较长提前期和最强降水的预报附加值较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving National Blend of Models Probabilistic Precipitation Forecasts Using Long Time Series of Reforecasts and Precipitation Reanalyses. Part II: Results
Abstract This second part of the series presents results from verifying a precipitation forecast calibration method discussed in the first part, based on quantile mapping (QM), weighting of sorted members, and dressing of the ensemble. NOAA’s Global Ensemble Forecast System, version 12 (GEFSv12), reforecasts were used in this study. The method was validated with preoperational GEFSv12 forecasts from December 2017 to November 2019. The method is proposed as an enhancement for GEFSv12 precipitation postprocessing in NOAA’s National Blend of Models. The first part described adaptations to the methodology to leverage the ∼20-yr GEFSv12 reforecast data. As shown here in this part, when compared with probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts from the raw ensemble, the adapted method produced downscaled, high-resolution forecasts that were significantly more reliable and skillful than raw ensemble-derived probabilities, especially at shorter lead times (i.e., <5 days) and for forecasts of events from light precipitation to >10 mm (6 h) −1 . Cool-season events in the western United States were especially improved when the QM algorithm was applied, providing a statistical downscaling with realistic smaller-scale detail related to terrain features. The method provided less value added for forecasts of longer lead times and for the heaviest precipitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Monthly Weather Review (MWR) (ISSN: 0027-0644; eISSN: 1520-0493) publishes research relevant to the analysis and prediction of observed atmospheric circulations and physics, including technique development, data assimilation, model validation, and relevant case studies. This research includes numerical and data assimilation techniques that apply to the atmosphere and/or ocean environments. MWR also addresses phenomena having seasonal and subseasonal time scales.
期刊最新文献
Predicting fibrosis progression in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients using the FAST Score: A paired biopsy study. Improvement of albedo and snow-cover simulation during snow events over the Tibetan Plateau Influences of the South American Low-Level Jet on the Convective Environment in Central Argentina using a Convection-Permitting Simulation Orographic Controls on Extreme Precipitation associated with a Mei-yu Front The Response of Precipitation to Initial Soil Moisture over the Tibetan Plateau: Respective Effects of Boundary Layer Vertical Heat and Vapor Diffusions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1