风化泥岩粘土中CPT锥因子的定量分析

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1144/qjegh2023-014
Kevin M. Briggs, Yuderka Trinidad González, William Powrie, Simon Butler, Nick Sartain
{"title":"风化泥岩粘土中CPT锥因子的定量分析","authors":"Kevin M. Briggs, Yuderka Trinidad González, William Powrie, Simon Butler, Nick Sartain","doi":"10.1144/qjegh2023-014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The empirical interpretation of cone penetration test (CPT) cone factors ( N k ) can be subject to considerable variability for clays derived from weathered mudstones, leading to significant deviations in the estimation of undrained shear strength ( S u ). This paper presents a comparison of triaxial and CPT data from a site investigation in clays derived from weathered mudstones in central England. Corrected cone factors ( N kt,UU ) were derived from a one-to-one comparison of 94 pairs of unconsolidated, undrained triaxial and CPT data from equivalent depths. The performance of the cone factors was evaluated using a training set (75 pairs) and a test set (19 pairs). A parametric study was used to explore the variability of N kt,UU , quantified using the coefficient of variation (COV Nkt,UU ), for varied separation distance thresholds ( D s ) between individual triaxial and CPT data. The absolute deviation between the laboratory shear strength ( S u(Lab) ) and that predicted from CPT profiles (S u(CPT) ) was not sensitive to N kt,UU values in the range 25 < N kt,UU < 31. The parametric study showed that D s could be increased from 50 to 250 m, to include more data pairs for estimates of N kt,UU , without substantially increasing COV Nkt,UU .","PeriodicalId":20937,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology","volume":"76 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying CPT cone factors in clays derived from weathered mudstone\",\"authors\":\"Kevin M. Briggs, Yuderka Trinidad González, William Powrie, Simon Butler, Nick Sartain\",\"doi\":\"10.1144/qjegh2023-014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The empirical interpretation of cone penetration test (CPT) cone factors ( N k ) can be subject to considerable variability for clays derived from weathered mudstones, leading to significant deviations in the estimation of undrained shear strength ( S u ). This paper presents a comparison of triaxial and CPT data from a site investigation in clays derived from weathered mudstones in central England. Corrected cone factors ( N kt,UU ) were derived from a one-to-one comparison of 94 pairs of unconsolidated, undrained triaxial and CPT data from equivalent depths. The performance of the cone factors was evaluated using a training set (75 pairs) and a test set (19 pairs). A parametric study was used to explore the variability of N kt,UU , quantified using the coefficient of variation (COV Nkt,UU ), for varied separation distance thresholds ( D s ) between individual triaxial and CPT data. The absolute deviation between the laboratory shear strength ( S u(Lab) ) and that predicted from CPT profiles (S u(CPT) ) was not sensitive to N kt,UU values in the range 25 < N kt,UU < 31. The parametric study showed that D s could be increased from 50 to 250 m, to include more data pairs for estimates of N kt,UU , without substantially increasing COV Nkt,UU .\",\"PeriodicalId\":20937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology\",\"volume\":\"76 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2023-014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2023-014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于来自风化泥岩的粘土,锥贯试验(CPT)锥因子(N k)的经验解释可能存在相当大的变异性,导致不排水抗剪强度(S u)的估计存在显著偏差。本文介绍了在英国中部对风化泥岩粘土进行现场调查所得的三轴和CPT数据的比较。校正后的锥因子(nkt,UU)是通过对等效深度的94对未固结、不排水的三轴和CPT数据进行一对一比较得出的。使用训练集(75对)和测试集(19对)对锥因子的性能进行评估。采用参数化研究探讨了Nkt,UU的变异性,并使用变异系数(COV Nkt,UU)量化了个体三轴和CPT数据之间不同的分离距离阈值(D s)。实验室抗剪强度(S u(Lab))与CPT剖面预测抗剪强度(S u(CPT))之间的绝对偏差对nkt不敏感,UU值在25 <范围内;N & t;31. 参数化研究表明,在不显著增加COV Nkt,UU的情况下,D s可以从50 m增加到250 m,以包含更多的数据对来估计Nkt,UU。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantifying CPT cone factors in clays derived from weathered mudstone
The empirical interpretation of cone penetration test (CPT) cone factors ( N k ) can be subject to considerable variability for clays derived from weathered mudstones, leading to significant deviations in the estimation of undrained shear strength ( S u ). This paper presents a comparison of triaxial and CPT data from a site investigation in clays derived from weathered mudstones in central England. Corrected cone factors ( N kt,UU ) were derived from a one-to-one comparison of 94 pairs of unconsolidated, undrained triaxial and CPT data from equivalent depths. The performance of the cone factors was evaluated using a training set (75 pairs) and a test set (19 pairs). A parametric study was used to explore the variability of N kt,UU , quantified using the coefficient of variation (COV Nkt,UU ), for varied separation distance thresholds ( D s ) between individual triaxial and CPT data. The absolute deviation between the laboratory shear strength ( S u(Lab) ) and that predicted from CPT profiles (S u(CPT) ) was not sensitive to N kt,UU values in the range 25 < N kt,UU < 31. The parametric study showed that D s could be increased from 50 to 250 m, to include more data pairs for estimates of N kt,UU , without substantially increasing COV Nkt,UU .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology is owned by the Geological Society of London and published by the Geological Society Publishing House. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology (QJEGH) is an established peer reviewed international journal featuring papers on geology as applied to civil engineering mining practice and water resources. Papers are invited from, and about, all areas of the world on engineering geology and hydrogeology topics. This includes but is not limited to: applied geophysics, engineering geomorphology, environmental geology, hydrogeology, groundwater quality, ground source heat, contaminated land, waste management, land use planning, geotechnics, rock mechanics, geomaterials and geological hazards. The journal publishes the prestigious Glossop and Ineson lectures, research papers, case studies, review articles, technical notes, photographic features, thematic sets, discussion papers, editorial opinion and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Degradation and protection of cut slopes in weathered gneiss; a 40-year case study Development of a drought-resilient water supply from dolomitized limestones of the Irish Midlands Understanding the Behavior of Seismically Derived Poisson's Ratio in Near Surface Characterization Jet grouting to new depths in the Lambeth Group and Thanet Formation beneath London Size Effect of Anisotropy in Rocks Spatial Variability: Evaluating through Digital Drilling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1