内部沟通招聘广告中的声音和“数字干扰”:提出声音连续体

Sonya Sandham
{"title":"内部沟通招聘广告中的声音和“数字干扰”:提出声音连续体","authors":"Sonya Sandham","doi":"10.1108/ccij-05-2023-0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study of job advertisements for internal communication practitioners aims to investigate the signals that organisations are sending the profession about what is required of these roles. The concept of corporate voice – the “voice” of the organisation – is problematised to explore tensions in vocality. The aim is to support communication practitioners to navigate multi-vocality in the evolving professional context of digital communication technologies and changes in the workplace. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative study considers the role of voice in corporate communication practices and offers insights into “digital disruption” and the discursive pressure of employers' priorities on the profession and its practices. Job advertisements for internal communication practitioners were examined during 6-month periods in 2018, 2020 and 2022, which was a significant time of change for the profession with the global COVID-19 pandemic. Findings Qualitative content analysis of 514 internal communication job advertisements identifies that control and consistency are valorised, and continue to dominate descriptions of internal communication skills and responsibilities. The digital affordances that communication practitioners rely on has not changed significantly and a preference for “broadcasting” is evident. Originality/value This study provides insights into how Australian organisations shape and sustain univocal corporate communication practices, and the incompatibility of narrow configurations of voice with emerging organisational challenges such as social connectedness.","PeriodicalId":10696,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Communications: An International Journal","volume":"62 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voice and “digital disruption” in internal communication job advertisements: proposing a vocality continuum\",\"authors\":\"Sonya Sandham\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ccij-05-2023-0075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose This study of job advertisements for internal communication practitioners aims to investigate the signals that organisations are sending the profession about what is required of these roles. The concept of corporate voice – the “voice” of the organisation – is problematised to explore tensions in vocality. The aim is to support communication practitioners to navigate multi-vocality in the evolving professional context of digital communication technologies and changes in the workplace. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative study considers the role of voice in corporate communication practices and offers insights into “digital disruption” and the discursive pressure of employers' priorities on the profession and its practices. Job advertisements for internal communication practitioners were examined during 6-month periods in 2018, 2020 and 2022, which was a significant time of change for the profession with the global COVID-19 pandemic. Findings Qualitative content analysis of 514 internal communication job advertisements identifies that control and consistency are valorised, and continue to dominate descriptions of internal communication skills and responsibilities. The digital affordances that communication practitioners rely on has not changed significantly and a preference for “broadcasting” is evident. Originality/value This study provides insights into how Australian organisations shape and sustain univocal corporate communication practices, and the incompatibility of narrow configurations of voice with emerging organisational challenges such as social connectedness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Communications: An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"62 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Communications: An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-05-2023-0075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Communications: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-05-2023-0075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对内部沟通从业者的招聘广告进行了研究,旨在调查组织向该行业发出的关于这些角色的要求的信号。企业声音的概念——组织的“声音”——是有问题的,以探索声音的紧张关系。其目的是支持通信从业者在不断发展的数字通信技术和工作场所变化的专业背景下驾驭多种声音。本定性研究考虑了声音在企业沟通实践中的作用,并对“数字颠覆”和雇主对专业及其实践的优先事项的话语压力提供了见解。在2018年、2020年和2022年的6个月期间,对内部沟通从业者的招聘广告进行了审查,这是该行业在全球COVID-19大流行中发生重大变化的时期。对514个内部沟通招聘广告的定性内容分析发现,控制和一致性得到了重视,并继续主导内部沟通技巧和职责的描述。通信从业者所依赖的数字支持并没有显著改变,对“广播”的偏好很明显。独创性/价值本研究提供了澳大利亚组织如何塑造和维持单一的企业沟通实践的见解,以及狭隘的声音配置与新兴的组织挑战(如社会联系)的不兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Voice and “digital disruption” in internal communication job advertisements: proposing a vocality continuum
Purpose This study of job advertisements for internal communication practitioners aims to investigate the signals that organisations are sending the profession about what is required of these roles. The concept of corporate voice – the “voice” of the organisation – is problematised to explore tensions in vocality. The aim is to support communication practitioners to navigate multi-vocality in the evolving professional context of digital communication technologies and changes in the workplace. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative study considers the role of voice in corporate communication practices and offers insights into “digital disruption” and the discursive pressure of employers' priorities on the profession and its practices. Job advertisements for internal communication practitioners were examined during 6-month periods in 2018, 2020 and 2022, which was a significant time of change for the profession with the global COVID-19 pandemic. Findings Qualitative content analysis of 514 internal communication job advertisements identifies that control and consistency are valorised, and continue to dominate descriptions of internal communication skills and responsibilities. The digital affordances that communication practitioners rely on has not changed significantly and a preference for “broadcasting” is evident. Originality/value This study provides insights into how Australian organisations shape and sustain univocal corporate communication practices, and the incompatibility of narrow configurations of voice with emerging organisational challenges such as social connectedness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Societal impact of Brand Public Relations on gender equality: evidence for a mediation-type mechanism Empowering public relations for sustainability: examining the landscape in Turkey Effectiveness of femvertising communications on social media: how brand promises and motive attributions impact brand equity and endorsement outcomes Silent ripples: negative CSR associations' impact in non-crisis situations Online faith-holder communities in crisis: proposing and testing a dual-challenge model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1