两家医院主动脉瓣置换术对患者生存和费用的影响:多变量分析

IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES International Journal of Healthcare Management Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1080/20479700.2023.2279037
Raquel Vázquez-Mourelle, Gonzalo Rivas Costa, Eduardo Carracedo-Martínez, Carmen Canedo Romero, Jose Antonio Bravo Ricoy
{"title":"两家医院主动脉瓣置换术对患者生存和费用的影响:多变量分析","authors":"Raquel Vázquez-Mourelle, Gonzalo Rivas Costa, Eduardo Carracedo-Martínez, Carmen Canedo Romero, Jose Antonio Bravo Ricoy","doi":"10.1080/20479700.2023.2279037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTObjective To compare the survival and costs of native aortic valve replacement by open approach in two hospitals.Methods We analyzed 1,472 hospital discharges from two hospitals between 2017 and 2021. We followed mean post-operative length of stay and survival at 30 days, one year and five years. The variables under study were sex, age, type of prosthesis, complexity, hospital, cost of the valve, date of intervention, discharge and exitus if present. A bivariate and a multivariate analysis were performed.Results The two hospitals have baseline characteristics with no significant differences. One of the hospitals had a higher mean unit price, in both biological (96%) and mechanical prostheses (11%) (p1); this higher mortality did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate analysis.In both hospitals, older age was associated with lower survival at one year (HR = 1.299 CI = 1.035–1.630) and at five years (HR = 1.228, 95%CI = 1.023–1.476). Greater complexity is associated with lower survival in all three periods.Conclusions Higher costs for open aortic heart valves does not lead to better survival outcomes. There is room for improvement in hospital management of these resources.KEYWORDS: Heart valve prosthesiscardiac surgerysutureless bioprosthesissurvival ratecost analysis Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.Notes on contributorsRaquel Vázquez-MourelleRaquel Vázquez-Mourelle is a doctor in epidemiology and public healh and deputy directorate general in hospital management of Galician Health Service (Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS), Spain.Gonzalo Rivas CostaGonzalo Rivas-Costa is the head of hospital management service of Galician Health Service (Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS), Spain.Eduardo Carracedo-MartínezEduardo Carracedo-Martínez is a PhD epidemiology and public healh and a comunity pharmacist in Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS), Spain.Carmen Canedo RomeroCarmen Canedo Romero is the health proffesionals (doctors) with expertise in hospital care management of the Galician Health Service (Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS), Spain.Jose Antonio Bravo RicoyJosé Antonio Bravo Ricoy is the health proffesionals (doctors) with expertise in hospital care management of the Galician Health Service (Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS), Spain.","PeriodicalId":46911,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":"52 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of open native aortic valve replacement procedure on survival and costs in two hospitals: A multivariate analysis\",\"authors\":\"Raquel Vázquez-Mourelle, Gonzalo Rivas Costa, Eduardo Carracedo-Martínez, Carmen Canedo Romero, Jose Antonio Bravo Ricoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20479700.2023.2279037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTObjective To compare the survival and costs of native aortic valve replacement by open approach in two hospitals.Methods We analyzed 1,472 hospital discharges from two hospitals between 2017 and 2021. We followed mean post-operative length of stay and survival at 30 days, one year and five years. The variables under study were sex, age, type of prosthesis, complexity, hospital, cost of the valve, date of intervention, discharge and exitus if present. A bivariate and a multivariate analysis were performed.Results The two hospitals have baseline characteristics with no significant differences. One of the hospitals had a higher mean unit price, in both biological (96%) and mechanical prostheses (11%) (p1); this higher mortality did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate analysis.In both hospitals, older age was associated with lower survival at one year (HR = 1.299 CI = 1.035–1.630) and at five years (HR = 1.228, 95%CI = 1.023–1.476). Greater complexity is associated with lower survival in all three periods.Conclusions Higher costs for open aortic heart valves does not lead to better survival outcomes. There is room for improvement in hospital management of these resources.KEYWORDS: Heart valve prosthesiscardiac surgerysutureless bioprosthesissurvival ratecost analysis Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.Notes on contributorsRaquel Vázquez-MourelleRaquel Vázquez-Mourelle is a doctor in epidemiology and public healh and deputy directorate general in hospital management of Galician Health Service (Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS), Spain.Gonzalo Rivas CostaGonzalo Rivas-Costa is the head of hospital management service of Galician Health Service (Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS), Spain.Eduardo Carracedo-MartínezEduardo Carracedo-Martínez is a PhD epidemiology and public healh and a comunity pharmacist in Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS), Spain.Carmen Canedo RomeroCarmen Canedo Romero is the health proffesionals (doctors) with expertise in hospital care management of the Galician Health Service (Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS), Spain.Jose Antonio Bravo RicoyJosé Antonio Bravo Ricoy is the health proffesionals (doctors) with expertise in hospital care management of the Galician Health Service (Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS), Spain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Healthcare Management\",\"volume\":\"52 8\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Healthcare Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2023.2279037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2023.2279037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】目的比较两家医院开放入路主动脉瓣置换术的生存率和费用。方法对2017 - 2021年两家医院1472例出院患者进行分析。术后平均住院时间和生存时间分别为30天、1年和5年。研究的变量包括性别、年龄、假体类型、复杂性、医院、瓣膜费用、干预日期、出院和出院(如果存在)。进行了双变量和多变量分析。结果两家医院的基线特征无显著差异。其中一家医院的生物假体(96%)和机械假体(11%)的平均单价较高(p1);这种较高的死亡率在多变量分析中没有达到统计学意义。在这两家医院,年龄越大,1年生存率越低(HR = 1.299 CI = 1.035-1.630), 5年生存率越低(HR = 1.228, 95%CI = 1.023-1.476)。在这三个时期,复杂性越高,存活率越低。结论:高成本的心脏主动脉瓣开窗术并不能带来更好的生存结果。医院对这些资源的管理还有改进的余地。关键词:心脏瓣膜假体心脏手术无缝线生物假体存活率成本分析披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。其他信息资金作者报告没有与本文所述工作相关的资金。关于供稿人的说明raquel Vázquez-MourelleRaquel Vázquez-Mourelle是西班牙加利西亚卫生局(Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS)的流行病学和公共卫生博士和医院管理副局长。Gonzalo Rivas- costa是西班牙加利西亚卫生局(Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS)医院管理服务的负责人。Eduardo Carracedo-MartínezEduardo Carracedo-Martínez是西班牙圣地亚哥德孔波斯特拉医院(Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS)的流行病学和公共卫生博士和社区药剂师。Carmen Canedo Romero是西班牙加利西亚卫生局(Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS)医院护理管理方面的专业卫生人员(医生)。jos Antonio Bravo Ricoy是西班牙加利西亚卫生局(Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS)具有医院护理管理专业知识的卫生专业人员(医生)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of open native aortic valve replacement procedure on survival and costs in two hospitals: A multivariate analysis
ABSTRACTObjective To compare the survival and costs of native aortic valve replacement by open approach in two hospitals.Methods We analyzed 1,472 hospital discharges from two hospitals between 2017 and 2021. We followed mean post-operative length of stay and survival at 30 days, one year and five years. The variables under study were sex, age, type of prosthesis, complexity, hospital, cost of the valve, date of intervention, discharge and exitus if present. A bivariate and a multivariate analysis were performed.Results The two hospitals have baseline characteristics with no significant differences. One of the hospitals had a higher mean unit price, in both biological (96%) and mechanical prostheses (11%) (p1); this higher mortality did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate analysis.In both hospitals, older age was associated with lower survival at one year (HR = 1.299 CI = 1.035–1.630) and at five years (HR = 1.228, 95%CI = 1.023–1.476). Greater complexity is associated with lower survival in all three periods.Conclusions Higher costs for open aortic heart valves does not lead to better survival outcomes. There is room for improvement in hospital management of these resources.KEYWORDS: Heart valve prosthesiscardiac surgerysutureless bioprosthesissurvival ratecost analysis Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.Notes on contributorsRaquel Vázquez-MourelleRaquel Vázquez-Mourelle is a doctor in epidemiology and public healh and deputy directorate general in hospital management of Galician Health Service (Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS), Spain.Gonzalo Rivas CostaGonzalo Rivas-Costa is the head of hospital management service of Galician Health Service (Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS), Spain.Eduardo Carracedo-MartínezEduardo Carracedo-Martínez is a PhD epidemiology and public healh and a comunity pharmacist in Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS), Spain.Carmen Canedo RomeroCarmen Canedo Romero is the health proffesionals (doctors) with expertise in hospital care management of the Galician Health Service (Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS), Spain.Jose Antonio Bravo RicoyJosé Antonio Bravo Ricoy is the health proffesionals (doctors) with expertise in hospital care management of the Galician Health Service (Servicio Gallego de Salud- SERGAS), Spain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
77
期刊最新文献
Adolescent fertility and its impact on educational attainment in Nigeria: A propensity score matching approach Effect of transitioning from a pilot universal health coverage program on workload in select government-owned hospitals in Nyeri, Kenya Inspecting smoking addiction in youth in Türkiye: A latent class analysis using the Turkish version of the cigarette dependence scale Predicting one-year readmission of adult patients with pneumonia using machine learning approaches: A case study in the Philippines Patient initiated violence on physicians: Bibliometric analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1