{"title":"椭球导体的电阻极限响应:静磁公式","authors":"Peter K. Fullagar","doi":"10.1080/08123985.2023.2275804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractInterpreting transient electromagnetic (TEM) anomalies in terms of conductive rectangular plates is effective in many situations. However, not all conductors are thin and planar. Triaxial ellipsoid conductors are an attractive alternative: geometrically simple (corner-free), mathematically tractable at early and late time limits, and able to encompass shapes ranging from discs to elongate lenses to equi-dimensional pods. Accordingly a fast magnetostatic algorithm has been developed to compute the resistive limit (RL) response of a ellipsoidal conductor, which may also be permeable. The algorithm has been validated against new analytic resistive limit solutions for spherical and spheroidal conductors and against 3D multigrid finite difference modelling for a triaxial ellipsoidal conductor. A uniformly conductive ellipsoid supports three fundamental current modes in the resistive limit, an independent mode for excitation parallel to each of the principal axes. The RL current density increases linearly with radial distance from the ellipsoid centre. A formula for the time constant of an oblate spheroid has been derived for excitation parallel to its rotational axis, namely τ3≈σμ0bc/(4+6c/b), where σ is the conductivity and c and b are respectively the minor and major radii.KEYWORDS: Ellipsoidresistive limitelectromagneticsmodelling AcknowledgementsI am indebted to the late Dr. Yves Lamontagne (Lamontagne Geophysics) who kindly modelled triaxial ellipsoid RL responses using his MGEM 3D multigrid finite difference program and who provided physical insights. Dr. David Clark (CSIRO/Integrated Magnetics LLC) assisted with theoretical aspects, and in particular confirmed my derivation of equation (22) for the RL field inside a spherical conductor.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":50460,"journal":{"name":"Exploration Geophysics","volume":"76 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The resistive limit response of an ellipsoidal conductor: a magnetostatic formulation\",\"authors\":\"Peter K. Fullagar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08123985.2023.2275804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractInterpreting transient electromagnetic (TEM) anomalies in terms of conductive rectangular plates is effective in many situations. However, not all conductors are thin and planar. Triaxial ellipsoid conductors are an attractive alternative: geometrically simple (corner-free), mathematically tractable at early and late time limits, and able to encompass shapes ranging from discs to elongate lenses to equi-dimensional pods. Accordingly a fast magnetostatic algorithm has been developed to compute the resistive limit (RL) response of a ellipsoidal conductor, which may also be permeable. The algorithm has been validated against new analytic resistive limit solutions for spherical and spheroidal conductors and against 3D multigrid finite difference modelling for a triaxial ellipsoidal conductor. A uniformly conductive ellipsoid supports three fundamental current modes in the resistive limit, an independent mode for excitation parallel to each of the principal axes. The RL current density increases linearly with radial distance from the ellipsoid centre. A formula for the time constant of an oblate spheroid has been derived for excitation parallel to its rotational axis, namely τ3≈σμ0bc/(4+6c/b), where σ is the conductivity and c and b are respectively the minor and major radii.KEYWORDS: Ellipsoidresistive limitelectromagneticsmodelling AcknowledgementsI am indebted to the late Dr. Yves Lamontagne (Lamontagne Geophysics) who kindly modelled triaxial ellipsoid RL responses using his MGEM 3D multigrid finite difference program and who provided physical insights. Dr. David Clark (CSIRO/Integrated Magnetics LLC) assisted with theoretical aspects, and in particular confirmed my derivation of equation (22) for the RL field inside a spherical conductor.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":50460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploration Geophysics\",\"volume\":\"76 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploration Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08123985.2023.2275804\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploration Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08123985.2023.2275804","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The resistive limit response of an ellipsoidal conductor: a magnetostatic formulation
AbstractInterpreting transient electromagnetic (TEM) anomalies in terms of conductive rectangular plates is effective in many situations. However, not all conductors are thin and planar. Triaxial ellipsoid conductors are an attractive alternative: geometrically simple (corner-free), mathematically tractable at early and late time limits, and able to encompass shapes ranging from discs to elongate lenses to equi-dimensional pods. Accordingly a fast magnetostatic algorithm has been developed to compute the resistive limit (RL) response of a ellipsoidal conductor, which may also be permeable. The algorithm has been validated against new analytic resistive limit solutions for spherical and spheroidal conductors and against 3D multigrid finite difference modelling for a triaxial ellipsoidal conductor. A uniformly conductive ellipsoid supports three fundamental current modes in the resistive limit, an independent mode for excitation parallel to each of the principal axes. The RL current density increases linearly with radial distance from the ellipsoid centre. A formula for the time constant of an oblate spheroid has been derived for excitation parallel to its rotational axis, namely τ3≈σμ0bc/(4+6c/b), where σ is the conductivity and c and b are respectively the minor and major radii.KEYWORDS: Ellipsoidresistive limitelectromagneticsmodelling AcknowledgementsI am indebted to the late Dr. Yves Lamontagne (Lamontagne Geophysics) who kindly modelled triaxial ellipsoid RL responses using his MGEM 3D multigrid finite difference program and who provided physical insights. Dr. David Clark (CSIRO/Integrated Magnetics LLC) assisted with theoretical aspects, and in particular confirmed my derivation of equation (22) for the RL field inside a spherical conductor.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
期刊介绍:
Exploration Geophysics is published on behalf of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists (ASEG), Society of Exploration Geophysics of Japan (SEGJ), and Korean Society of Earth and Exploration Geophysicists (KSEG).
The journal presents significant case histories, advances in data interpretation, and theoretical developments resulting from original research in exploration and applied geophysics. Papers that may have implications for field practice in Australia, even if they report work from other continents, will be welcome. ´Exploration and applied geophysics´ will be interpreted broadly by the editors, so that geotechnical and environmental studies are by no means precluded.
Papers are expected to be of a high standard. Exploration Geophysics uses an international pool of reviewers drawn from industry and academic authorities as selected by the editorial panel.
The journal provides a common meeting ground for geophysicists active in either field studies or basic research.