{"title":"投资税收激励带来的意想不到的能源效率收益:来自中国准自然实验的微观证据","authors":"Yijia Song, Xitao Li, Ruoxi Liu, Xin Peng","doi":"10.1111/rode.13058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In light of the economic recession in the post‐pandemic era, countries have implemented a wide array of fiscal stimulus measures as a means of addressing the prevailing economic challenges but often neglect to consider the consequences of these stimuli on the environment. Therefore, it is crucial for the government to take environmental considerations into economic stimulus packages, aiming to achieve a sustainable “green recovery.” Using China's value‐added tax (VAT) reform as a quasi‐natural experiment, we find that VAT incentives have significantly improved the firm's energy efficiency through factor substitution and technological progress, indicating that tax incentives are beneficial to economic stimulus and energy saving. In addition, we find that energy market distortions play a significant negative moderating role, which weakens energy efficiency gained from the VAT incentives. Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis shows that the improvement of energy efficiency is concentrated in non‐state, high‐capital intensity, and high financing‐dependent firms. According to our findings, policymakers should have a thorough understanding of the potential of tax incentives for investment as a policy tool for achieving a “green recovery” as long as the energy market is efficient.","PeriodicalId":47635,"journal":{"name":"Review of Development Economics","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The unintended energy efficiency gain from tax incentives for investment: Micro‐evidence from quasi‐natural experiments in China\",\"authors\":\"Yijia Song, Xitao Li, Ruoxi Liu, Xin Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/rode.13058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In light of the economic recession in the post‐pandemic era, countries have implemented a wide array of fiscal stimulus measures as a means of addressing the prevailing economic challenges but often neglect to consider the consequences of these stimuli on the environment. Therefore, it is crucial for the government to take environmental considerations into economic stimulus packages, aiming to achieve a sustainable “green recovery.” Using China's value‐added tax (VAT) reform as a quasi‐natural experiment, we find that VAT incentives have significantly improved the firm's energy efficiency through factor substitution and technological progress, indicating that tax incentives are beneficial to economic stimulus and energy saving. In addition, we find that energy market distortions play a significant negative moderating role, which weakens energy efficiency gained from the VAT incentives. Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis shows that the improvement of energy efficiency is concentrated in non‐state, high‐capital intensity, and high financing‐dependent firms. According to our findings, policymakers should have a thorough understanding of the potential of tax incentives for investment as a policy tool for achieving a “green recovery” as long as the energy market is efficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Development Economics\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Development Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13058\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Development Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The unintended energy efficiency gain from tax incentives for investment: Micro‐evidence from quasi‐natural experiments in China
Abstract In light of the economic recession in the post‐pandemic era, countries have implemented a wide array of fiscal stimulus measures as a means of addressing the prevailing economic challenges but often neglect to consider the consequences of these stimuli on the environment. Therefore, it is crucial for the government to take environmental considerations into economic stimulus packages, aiming to achieve a sustainable “green recovery.” Using China's value‐added tax (VAT) reform as a quasi‐natural experiment, we find that VAT incentives have significantly improved the firm's energy efficiency through factor substitution and technological progress, indicating that tax incentives are beneficial to economic stimulus and energy saving. In addition, we find that energy market distortions play a significant negative moderating role, which weakens energy efficiency gained from the VAT incentives. Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis shows that the improvement of energy efficiency is concentrated in non‐state, high‐capital intensity, and high financing‐dependent firms. According to our findings, policymakers should have a thorough understanding of the potential of tax incentives for investment as a policy tool for achieving a “green recovery” as long as the energy market is efficient.
期刊介绍:
The Review of Development Economics is a leading journal publishing high-quality research in development economics. It publishes rigorous analytical papers, theoretical and empirical, which deal with contemporary growth problems of developing countries, including the transition economies. The Review not only serves as a link between theorists and practitioners, but also builds a bridge between development economists and their colleagues in related fields. While the level of the Review of Development Economics is academic, the materials presented are of value to policy makers and researchers, especially those in developing countries.