模块化聚合物雨水收集结构对一周设计卡车荷载的响应

IF 2.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Geosynthetics International Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1680/jgein.23.00095
R. W. I. Brachman, A. Zarpeima, J. M. LeBlanc
{"title":"模块化聚合物雨水收集结构对一周设计卡车荷载的响应","authors":"R. W. I. Brachman, A. Zarpeima, J. M. LeBlanc","doi":"10.1680/jgein.23.00095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Full-scale physical modelling is used to evaluate the response of modular polymer stormwater collection structures when subjected to design-truck loading that was sustained for one week (i.e. a parked vehicle) and when buried with minimum soil cover. Surface loading was applied on a steel load pad that simulates one-half of the AASHTO design-truck single-axle that was held constant for 1 week to assess the stability of the buried system and demand on the platen and column components of the modules to allow independent load rating of the buried structure. No collapse or limiting state occurred. The 1-week creep buckling resistance was found to be nearly 4 times the factored column demand to 1-week loading for both module types. New insight on time dependent behaviour of the soil-structure system was gained by comparing the buried response to creep tests conducted on isolated columns and platens. The response of the buried soil-structure system was less severe than unconstrained creep. Column loads were found to not increase with time. Bending deflections increased by 1.04 to 1.26 times when buried rather than by 3.0 to 3.4 times for unconstrained creep as platen creep when buried was greatly restrained by the soil.","PeriodicalId":12616,"journal":{"name":"Geosynthetics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modular polymer stormwater collection structure response to one-week design truck load\",\"authors\":\"R. W. I. Brachman, A. Zarpeima, J. M. LeBlanc\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jgein.23.00095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Full-scale physical modelling is used to evaluate the response of modular polymer stormwater collection structures when subjected to design-truck loading that was sustained for one week (i.e. a parked vehicle) and when buried with minimum soil cover. Surface loading was applied on a steel load pad that simulates one-half of the AASHTO design-truck single-axle that was held constant for 1 week to assess the stability of the buried system and demand on the platen and column components of the modules to allow independent load rating of the buried structure. No collapse or limiting state occurred. The 1-week creep buckling resistance was found to be nearly 4 times the factored column demand to 1-week loading for both module types. New insight on time dependent behaviour of the soil-structure system was gained by comparing the buried response to creep tests conducted on isolated columns and platens. The response of the buried soil-structure system was less severe than unconstrained creep. Column loads were found to not increase with time. Bending deflections increased by 1.04 to 1.26 times when buried rather than by 3.0 to 3.4 times for unconstrained creep as platen creep when buried was greatly restrained by the soil.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geosynthetics International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geosynthetics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.23.00095\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosynthetics International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.23.00095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全尺寸物理模型用于评估模块化聚合物雨水收集结构在持续一周的设计卡车装载(即停放的车辆)和埋在最小土壤覆盖下时的响应。在模拟AASHTO设计卡车单轴一半的钢加载垫上施加表面载荷,保持恒定一周,以评估埋地系统的稳定性,以及模块的压板和柱组件的需求,以允许独立的埋地结构荷载等级。未发生崩溃或限制状态。两种模块类型的1周蠕变屈曲抗力几乎是1周加载时柱需求因子的4倍。通过比较在孤立柱和台板上进行的蠕变试验的埋地响应,获得了对土-结构系统的时间依赖行为的新见解。埋土-结构体系的蠕变响应要小于无约束蠕变。柱荷载不随时间增加而增加。埋地条件下,无约束蠕变的弯曲挠度增加了1.04 ~ 1.26倍,而无约束蠕变的弯曲挠度增加了3.0 ~ 3.4倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modular polymer stormwater collection structure response to one-week design truck load
Full-scale physical modelling is used to evaluate the response of modular polymer stormwater collection structures when subjected to design-truck loading that was sustained for one week (i.e. a parked vehicle) and when buried with minimum soil cover. Surface loading was applied on a steel load pad that simulates one-half of the AASHTO design-truck single-axle that was held constant for 1 week to assess the stability of the buried system and demand on the platen and column components of the modules to allow independent load rating of the buried structure. No collapse or limiting state occurred. The 1-week creep buckling resistance was found to be nearly 4 times the factored column demand to 1-week loading for both module types. New insight on time dependent behaviour of the soil-structure system was gained by comparing the buried response to creep tests conducted on isolated columns and platens. The response of the buried soil-structure system was less severe than unconstrained creep. Column loads were found to not increase with time. Bending deflections increased by 1.04 to 1.26 times when buried rather than by 3.0 to 3.4 times for unconstrained creep as platen creep when buried was greatly restrained by the soil.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geosynthetics International
Geosynthetics International ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: An online only, rapid publication journal, Geosynthetics International – an official journal of the International Geosynthetics Society (IGS) – publishes the best information on current geosynthetics technology in research, design innovation, new materials and construction practice. Topics covered The whole of geosynthetic materials (including natural fibre products) such as research, behaviour, performance analysis, testing, design, construction methods, case histories and field experience. Geosynthetics International is received by all members of the IGS as part of their membership, and is published in e-only format six times a year.
期刊最新文献
Geosynthetic MSE walls research and practice: past, present, and future (2023 IGS Bathurst Lecture) Investigation of the mechanical response of recovered geogrids under repeated loading Factors affecting the tensile strength of bituminous geomembrane seams Centrifuge modeling of levees with geocomposite chimney drain subjected to flooding Selection of long-term shear strength parameters for strain softening geosynthetic interfaces (2023 IGS Rowe Lecture)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1