在提供非医疗家庭支助服务的情况下,老龄化不一定转化为依赖

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Ageing & Society Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1017/s0144686x23000478
Kaitlyn Kuryk, Laura M. Funk, Grace Warner, Marilyn Macdonald, Michelle Lobchuk, Julie Rempel, Lauren Spring, Janice Keefe
{"title":"在提供非医疗家庭支助服务的情况下,老龄化不一定转化为依赖","authors":"Kaitlyn Kuryk, Laura M. Funk, Grace Warner, Marilyn Macdonald, Michelle Lobchuk, Julie Rempel, Lauren Spring, Janice Keefe","doi":"10.1017/s0144686x23000478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Older adults who age at home independently are often celebrated as having anticipated and planned for their care needs in the later stages of life, whereas those who receive assistance from home support services are often stigmatised as dependent and characterised as a ‘drain on the system’. However, this thematic analysis of interview data from 12 home care clients in two Canadian provinces offers evidence that counters the assumption that home care clients are passive recipients of care. Extending Corbin and Strauss' theorisation of how individuals manage chronic conditions alongside Dorothy Smiths' conception of work, we explore how home care clients ‘work’ to receive care as they age in place. Specifically, home care clients not only engage in daily life work, illness work and biographical work, but also advocate for themselves and their workers, co-ordinate and negotiate with members of their caring convoys and networks, and adapt in various ways to navigate personal, relational, structural and policy-level challenges. We suggest that work done by older adults who are ageing in place be addressed, acknowledged and incorporated into care planning and operational policy development to challenge both the stigma of dependency and neoliberal narratives of self-sufficiency.","PeriodicalId":51364,"journal":{"name":"Ageing & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ageing in place with non-medical home support services need not translate into dependence\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlyn Kuryk, Laura M. Funk, Grace Warner, Marilyn Macdonald, Michelle Lobchuk, Julie Rempel, Lauren Spring, Janice Keefe\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0144686x23000478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Older adults who age at home independently are often celebrated as having anticipated and planned for their care needs in the later stages of life, whereas those who receive assistance from home support services are often stigmatised as dependent and characterised as a ‘drain on the system’. However, this thematic analysis of interview data from 12 home care clients in two Canadian provinces offers evidence that counters the assumption that home care clients are passive recipients of care. Extending Corbin and Strauss' theorisation of how individuals manage chronic conditions alongside Dorothy Smiths' conception of work, we explore how home care clients ‘work’ to receive care as they age in place. Specifically, home care clients not only engage in daily life work, illness work and biographical work, but also advocate for themselves and their workers, co-ordinate and negotiate with members of their caring convoys and networks, and adapt in various ways to navigate personal, relational, structural and policy-level challenges. We suggest that work done by older adults who are ageing in place be addressed, acknowledged and incorporated into care planning and operational policy development to challenge both the stigma of dependency and neoliberal narratives of self-sufficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ageing & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ageing & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x23000478\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x23000478","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在家中独立生活的老年人通常被庆祝为他们在生命后期阶段的护理需求进行了预期和计划,而那些从家庭支持服务中获得帮助的人往往被污名化为依赖并被描述为“系统的流失”。然而,对加拿大两个省的12个家庭护理客户的访谈数据的专题分析提供了证据,反驳了家庭护理客户是被动接受护理的假设。将Corbin和Strauss关于个人如何管理慢性疾病的理论与Dorothy Smiths的工作概念相结合,我们探索了家庭护理客户如何在年老时“工作”以接受护理。具体来说,家庭护理客户不仅要从事日常生活工作、疾病工作和传记工作,还要为自己和他们的工人辩护,与他们的护理车队和网络成员协调和协商,并以各种方式适应个人、关系、结构和政策层面的挑战。我们建议将老年人所做的工作纳入到护理计划和操作政策制定中,以挑战依赖的耻辱和新自由主义的自给自足叙事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ageing in place with non-medical home support services need not translate into dependence
Abstract Older adults who age at home independently are often celebrated as having anticipated and planned for their care needs in the later stages of life, whereas those who receive assistance from home support services are often stigmatised as dependent and characterised as a ‘drain on the system’. However, this thematic analysis of interview data from 12 home care clients in two Canadian provinces offers evidence that counters the assumption that home care clients are passive recipients of care. Extending Corbin and Strauss' theorisation of how individuals manage chronic conditions alongside Dorothy Smiths' conception of work, we explore how home care clients ‘work’ to receive care as they age in place. Specifically, home care clients not only engage in daily life work, illness work and biographical work, but also advocate for themselves and their workers, co-ordinate and negotiate with members of their caring convoys and networks, and adapt in various ways to navigate personal, relational, structural and policy-level challenges. We suggest that work done by older adults who are ageing in place be addressed, acknowledged and incorporated into care planning and operational policy development to challenge both the stigma of dependency and neoliberal narratives of self-sufficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ageing & Society
Ageing & Society GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.00%
发文量
144
期刊介绍: Ageing & Society is an interdisciplinary and international journal devoted to the understanding of human ageing and the circumstances of older people in their social and cultural contexts. It draws contributions and has readers from many disciplines including gerontology, sociology, demography, psychology, economics, medicine, social policy and the humanities. Ageing & Society promotes high-quality original research which is relevant to an international audience to encourage the exchange of ideas across the broad audience of multidisciplinary academics and practitioners working in the field of ageing.
期刊最新文献
Loneliness and social isolation of ethnic minority/immigrant older adults: a scoping review Labour market exit routes in high- and low-educated older workers before and after social insurance and retirement policy reforms in Sweden Social engagement and wellbeing in late life: a systematic review Understanding older adults' travel behaviour and mobility needs during the COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of the hierarchy of travel needs: a systematic review Tragedy and value of life of older persons in long-term care homes during COVID-19: a critical discourse analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1