恐怖主义抓捕行动中的决策:陷阱是由沉没成本效应和群体间偏见驱动的吗?

Jesse J. Norris, Joseph P. McFall, Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk
{"title":"恐怖主义抓捕行动中的决策:陷阱是由沉没成本效应和群体间偏见驱动的吗?","authors":"Jesse J. Norris, Joseph P. McFall, Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk","doi":"10.1080/18335330.2023.2266712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPrevious research has found that entrapment – inducing suspects to commit crimes they were not already predisposed to commit – is widespread in US terrorism sting operations, particularly those involving Muslims and racial minorities. To test whether the sunk cost effect and/or intergroup biases could explain decisions to authorise these operations, we conducted an experiment in which college student and MTurk participants (n = 1009) from the US and India decided whether to approve an operation featuring apparent entrapment. Sunk costs and suspect characteristics were manipulated across experimental conditions. Results for US participants (n = 792) show that high sunk costs increased approval of the operation only for relatively young participants, and only in scenarios with non-Muslim suspects. Scenarios with Muslim suspects yielded higher approval rates for participants who were confident in their decision. Indian participants (n = 217) were more likely than US participants to approve the operation and were unaffected by suspect religion and sunk costs. Results suggest that the sunk cost bias may play some role in entrapment, although other factors, such as outgroup bias, may also contribute to these decisions. The observed cross-cultural differences could result from international variations in susceptibility to the sunk cost effect, among other factors.KEYWORDS: Sunk cost biascounterterrorismundercover policingentrapmentIndiaUnited States Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 This might change with a larger sample size; after all, in the 70 and above analysis, participants still had twice the odds of authorizing in the high-cost scenario.Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by a grant from the Baldy Center for Law & Social Policy at the University at Buffalo, SUNY (to H. Grol-Prokopczyk) and research support funding from the Office of the Provost, SUNY Fredonia (to J. J. Norris).","PeriodicalId":37849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision-making in terrorism sting operations: is entrapment driven by the sunk-cost effect and intergroup biases?\",\"authors\":\"Jesse J. Norris, Joseph P. McFall, Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18335330.2023.2266712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTPrevious research has found that entrapment – inducing suspects to commit crimes they were not already predisposed to commit – is widespread in US terrorism sting operations, particularly those involving Muslims and racial minorities. To test whether the sunk cost effect and/or intergroup biases could explain decisions to authorise these operations, we conducted an experiment in which college student and MTurk participants (n = 1009) from the US and India decided whether to approve an operation featuring apparent entrapment. Sunk costs and suspect characteristics were manipulated across experimental conditions. Results for US participants (n = 792) show that high sunk costs increased approval of the operation only for relatively young participants, and only in scenarios with non-Muslim suspects. Scenarios with Muslim suspects yielded higher approval rates for participants who were confident in their decision. Indian participants (n = 217) were more likely than US participants to approve the operation and were unaffected by suspect religion and sunk costs. Results suggest that the sunk cost bias may play some role in entrapment, although other factors, such as outgroup bias, may also contribute to these decisions. The observed cross-cultural differences could result from international variations in susceptibility to the sunk cost effect, among other factors.KEYWORDS: Sunk cost biascounterterrorismundercover policingentrapmentIndiaUnited States Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 This might change with a larger sample size; after all, in the 70 and above analysis, participants still had twice the odds of authorizing in the high-cost scenario.Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by a grant from the Baldy Center for Law & Social Policy at the University at Buffalo, SUNY (to H. Grol-Prokopczyk) and research support funding from the Office of the Provost, SUNY Fredonia (to J. J. Norris).\",\"PeriodicalId\":37849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2023.2266712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2023.2266712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究发现,诱捕——诱导嫌疑人犯下他们没有犯罪倾向的罪行——在美国的恐怖主义诱捕行动中很普遍,特别是那些涉及穆斯林和少数民族的行动。为了检验沉没成本效应和/或群体间偏见是否可以解释授权这些行动的决定,我们进行了一项实验,来自美国和印度的大学生和土耳其人参与者(n = 1009)决定是否批准一项具有明显陷阱的行动。沉没成本和可疑特征在不同的实验条件下被操纵。美国参与者(n = 792)的结果表明,高沉没成本只增加了相对年轻的参与者对行动的认可,而且只在有非穆斯林嫌疑人的情况下。在有穆斯林嫌疑人的场景中,对自己的决定有信心的参与者获得了更高的支持率。印度参与者(n = 217)比美国参与者更有可能批准该行动,并且不受可疑宗教和沉没成本的影响。结果表明,沉没成本偏见可能在陷阱中发挥一定作用,尽管其他因素,如外群体偏见,也可能有助于这些决策。所观察到的跨文化差异可能是由于对沉没成本效应的易感性的国际差异,以及其他因素。关键词:沉没成本偏见反恐卧底警察陷阱印度美国披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突注1:这可能会随着样本量的增大而改变;毕竟,在70及以上的分析中,参与者在高成本情况下授权的几率仍然是两倍。本研究得到了纽约州立大学布法罗分校巴尔迪法律与社会政策中心(资助对象为H. Grol-Prokopczyk)和纽约州立大学弗里多尼亚分校教务长办公室(资助对象为J. J. Norris)的资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decision-making in terrorism sting operations: is entrapment driven by the sunk-cost effect and intergroup biases?
ABSTRACTPrevious research has found that entrapment – inducing suspects to commit crimes they were not already predisposed to commit – is widespread in US terrorism sting operations, particularly those involving Muslims and racial minorities. To test whether the sunk cost effect and/or intergroup biases could explain decisions to authorise these operations, we conducted an experiment in which college student and MTurk participants (n = 1009) from the US and India decided whether to approve an operation featuring apparent entrapment. Sunk costs and suspect characteristics were manipulated across experimental conditions. Results for US participants (n = 792) show that high sunk costs increased approval of the operation only for relatively young participants, and only in scenarios with non-Muslim suspects. Scenarios with Muslim suspects yielded higher approval rates for participants who were confident in their decision. Indian participants (n = 217) were more likely than US participants to approve the operation and were unaffected by suspect religion and sunk costs. Results suggest that the sunk cost bias may play some role in entrapment, although other factors, such as outgroup bias, may also contribute to these decisions. The observed cross-cultural differences could result from international variations in susceptibility to the sunk cost effect, among other factors.KEYWORDS: Sunk cost biascounterterrorismundercover policingentrapmentIndiaUnited States Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 This might change with a larger sample size; after all, in the 70 and above analysis, participants still had twice the odds of authorizing in the high-cost scenario.Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by a grant from the Baldy Center for Law & Social Policy at the University at Buffalo, SUNY (to H. Grol-Prokopczyk) and research support funding from the Office of the Provost, SUNY Fredonia (to J. J. Norris).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism (JPICT) is an international peer reviewed scholarly journal that acts as a forum for those around the world undertaking high quality research and practice in the areas of: Policing studies, Intelligence studies, Terrorism and counter terrorism studies; Cyber-policing, intelligence and terrorism. The Journal offers national, regional and international perspectives on current areas of scholarly and applied debate within these fields, while addressing the practical and theoretical issues and considerations that surround them. It aims to balance the discussion of practical realities with debates and research on relevant and significant theoretical issues. The Journal has the following major aims: To publish cutting-edge and contemporary research articles, reports and reviews on relevant topics; To publish articles that explore the interface between the areas of policing, intelligence and terrorism studies; To act as an international forum for exchange and discussion; To illustrate the nexus between theory and its practical applications and vice versa.
期刊最新文献
Optimising intelligence operations for international law enforcement: harnessing THRIVE for national intelligence model advancement Deadly consequences: lessons from the evolution of terrorist attacks against United States diplomats Contemporary terrorism challenges and responses in the Indo-Pacific The false dawns over Marawi: examining the post-Marawi counterterrorism strategy in the Philippines An Indonesian way of P/CVE and interpreting the whole-of-society approach: lessons from civil society organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1