空气磨蚀和酸蚀治疗第一恒磨牙牙槽和牙槽充填剂固位率的比较:裂口随机临床试验

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.7860/jcdr/2023/62942.18551
Bodike Deepika, C Vinay, KS Uloopi, Kakarla Sri Roja Ramya, Penmatsa Chaitanya, MV Ramesh
{"title":"空气磨蚀和酸蚀治疗第一恒磨牙牙槽和牙槽充填剂固位率的比较:裂口随机临床试验","authors":"Bodike Deepika, C Vinay, KS Uloopi, Kakarla Sri Roja Ramya, Penmatsa Chaitanya, MV Ramesh","doi":"10.7860/jcdr/2023/62942.18551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pit and fissure sealants are a reliable and safe method of occlusal caries prevention. Accurate preconditioning of the enamel surface is essential for long-term sealant retention. Aim: To assess the retention rate of pit and fissure sealants applied to first permanent molars treated with air abrasion and acid etching in children aged 6 to 9 years. Materials and Methods: This split-mouth randomised study was conducted in the Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India from March 2019 to March 2020. The study included 45 children aged 6-9 years with 180 completely erupted maxillary and mandibular first permanent molars. The children were randomly divided into two groups: Group-I (Air Abrasion) and Group-II (Conventional Acid Etch). After pretreatment of the enamel surface with either air abrasion or acid etching, sealant was applied. Sealant retention was evaluated at 6- and 12-month intervals using Tonn and Ryge’s scoring criteria under a dental operating microscope. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon Signedrank Test and the Mann-Whitney U Test. Results: The mean age of the study participants was 7.6±0.5 years at the 12-month interval, complete sealant retention was observed in 23% of teeth in the air abrasion group and 21% in the acid etch group. The p-value of 0.657 indicates that the difference was not statistically significant. The comparison of sealant retention rates in maxillary and mandibular molars treated with both air abrasion (p=0.191, p=0.881) and acid etching (p=1.000, p=0.574) showed no statistically significant differences at both the 6- and 12-month intervals. Conclusion: The retention rate of fissure sealants on enamel surfaces treated with air abrasion was comparable to acid etching. There was no difference in sealant retention rates between maxillary and mandibular molars in both the air abrasion and acid etch groups.","PeriodicalId":15483,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Retention Rates of Pit and Fissure Sealants Placed on First Permanent Molars Treated with Air Abrasion and Acid Etching: A Split-mouth Randomised Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Bodike Deepika, C Vinay, KS Uloopi, Kakarla Sri Roja Ramya, Penmatsa Chaitanya, MV Ramesh\",\"doi\":\"10.7860/jcdr/2023/62942.18551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Pit and fissure sealants are a reliable and safe method of occlusal caries prevention. Accurate preconditioning of the enamel surface is essential for long-term sealant retention. Aim: To assess the retention rate of pit and fissure sealants applied to first permanent molars treated with air abrasion and acid etching in children aged 6 to 9 years. Materials and Methods: This split-mouth randomised study was conducted in the Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India from March 2019 to March 2020. The study included 45 children aged 6-9 years with 180 completely erupted maxillary and mandibular first permanent molars. The children were randomly divided into two groups: Group-I (Air Abrasion) and Group-II (Conventional Acid Etch). After pretreatment of the enamel surface with either air abrasion or acid etching, sealant was applied. Sealant retention was evaluated at 6- and 12-month intervals using Tonn and Ryge’s scoring criteria under a dental operating microscope. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon Signedrank Test and the Mann-Whitney U Test. Results: The mean age of the study participants was 7.6±0.5 years at the 12-month interval, complete sealant retention was observed in 23% of teeth in the air abrasion group and 21% in the acid etch group. The p-value of 0.657 indicates that the difference was not statistically significant. The comparison of sealant retention rates in maxillary and mandibular molars treated with both air abrasion (p=0.191, p=0.881) and acid etching (p=1.000, p=0.574) showed no statistically significant differences at both the 6- and 12-month intervals. Conclusion: The retention rate of fissure sealants on enamel surfaces treated with air abrasion was comparable to acid etching. There was no difference in sealant retention rates between maxillary and mandibular molars in both the air abrasion and acid etch groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2023/62942.18551\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2023/62942.18551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牙槽和牙槽密封剂是一种可靠、安全的预防牙合龋的方法。对牙釉质表面进行准确的预处理对于长期保持密封剂至关重要。目的:评价6 ~ 9岁儿童第一恒磨牙空气磨蚀酸蚀后牙窝及牙槽充填剂的保留率。材料和方法:这项分口随机研究于2019年3月至2020年3月在印度安得拉邦比希玛瓦拉姆市Vishnu牙科学院儿科牙科学系进行。研究对象为45名6-9岁的儿童,180颗上颌和下颌第一恒磨牙完全萌出。将患儿随机分为两组:ⅰ组(空气磨蚀)和ⅱ组(常规酸蚀)。用空气磨损或酸蚀对牙釉质表面进行预处理后,涂上密封胶。在牙科手术显微镜下,采用Tonn和Ryge评分标准,每隔6个月和12个月评估一次密封剂潴留。采用Wilcoxon sign检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析。结果:研究对象的平均年龄为7.6±0.5岁,在12个月的间隔时间内,空气磨蚀组和酸蚀组的牙体完全固牙率分别为23%和21%。p值为0.657表示差异无统计学意义。空气磨蚀组(p=0.191, p=0.881)与酸蚀组(p=1.000, p=0.574)在上颌磨牙和下颌磨牙6个月和12个月间的密封剂保留率比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论:空气磨蚀与酸蚀对牙釉质表面缝隙封闭剂的保留率相当。空气磨蚀组和酸蚀组在上颌磨牙和下颌磨牙间的密封剂保留率无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the Retention Rates of Pit and Fissure Sealants Placed on First Permanent Molars Treated with Air Abrasion and Acid Etching: A Split-mouth Randomised Clinical Trial
Introduction: Pit and fissure sealants are a reliable and safe method of occlusal caries prevention. Accurate preconditioning of the enamel surface is essential for long-term sealant retention. Aim: To assess the retention rate of pit and fissure sealants applied to first permanent molars treated with air abrasion and acid etching in children aged 6 to 9 years. Materials and Methods: This split-mouth randomised study was conducted in the Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India from March 2019 to March 2020. The study included 45 children aged 6-9 years with 180 completely erupted maxillary and mandibular first permanent molars. The children were randomly divided into two groups: Group-I (Air Abrasion) and Group-II (Conventional Acid Etch). After pretreatment of the enamel surface with either air abrasion or acid etching, sealant was applied. Sealant retention was evaluated at 6- and 12-month intervals using Tonn and Ryge’s scoring criteria under a dental operating microscope. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon Signedrank Test and the Mann-Whitney U Test. Results: The mean age of the study participants was 7.6±0.5 years at the 12-month interval, complete sealant retention was observed in 23% of teeth in the air abrasion group and 21% in the acid etch group. The p-value of 0.657 indicates that the difference was not statistically significant. The comparison of sealant retention rates in maxillary and mandibular molars treated with both air abrasion (p=0.191, p=0.881) and acid etching (p=1.000, p=0.574) showed no statistically significant differences at both the 6- and 12-month intervals. Conclusion: The retention rate of fissure sealants on enamel surfaces treated with air abrasion was comparable to acid etching. There was no difference in sealant retention rates between maxillary and mandibular molars in both the air abrasion and acid etch groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
761
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Specialties Covered: Anaesthesia, Anatomy, Animal Research, Biochemistry, Biotechnology, Cardiology, Community, Dermatology, Dentistry, Education, Emergency Medicine, Endocrinology, Ethics, Ear Nose and Throat, Forensic, Gastroenterology, Genetics, Haematology, Health Management and Policy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Intensive Care, Internal Medicine, Microbiology, Health Management and Policy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Intensive Care, Internal Medicine, Microbiology, Nephrology / Renal, Neurology and Neuro-Surgery, Nutrition, Nursing/Midwifery, Oncology, Orthopaedics, Ophthalmology, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Neonatology Pharmacology, Physiology, Pathology, Plastic Surgery, Psychiatry/Mental Health, Rehabilitation / Physiotherapy, Radiology, Statistics, Surgery, Speech and Hearing (Audiology)
期刊最新文献
Correction. Correction. Correction. Correction. Mental Health of Foreign Medical Graduates in Tamil Nadu, India: A Mixed-methods Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1