用于原位氧和硫同位素比值测量的重晶石、无水石膏和石膏标准物质

IF 2.7 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research Pub Date : 2023-10-25 DOI:10.1111/ggr.12533
Bin Li, Michael Wiedenbeck, Frédéric Couffignal, Antonio M. Álvarez-Valero, Hui-Ming Bao, Chang-Fu Fan, Juan Han, Gui-Shan Jin, Yong-Bo Peng, Marcin Daniel Syczewski, Kimberly T. Tait, Franziska D.H. Wilke, Ulrich G. Wortmann
{"title":"用于原位氧和硫同位素比值测量的重晶石、无水石膏和石膏标准物质","authors":"Bin Li,&nbsp;Michael Wiedenbeck,&nbsp;Frédéric Couffignal,&nbsp;Antonio M. Álvarez-Valero,&nbsp;Hui-Ming Bao,&nbsp;Chang-Fu Fan,&nbsp;Juan Han,&nbsp;Gui-Shan Jin,&nbsp;Yong-Bo Peng,&nbsp;Marcin Daniel Syczewski,&nbsp;Kimberly T. Tait,&nbsp;Franziska D.H. Wilke,&nbsp;Ulrich G. Wortmann","doi":"10.1111/ggr.12533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Secondary ion mass spectrometry was used to test the δ<sup>18</sup>O and δ<sup>34</sup>S nanogram-scale homogeneity of a suite of candidate sulfate minerals, ultimately selecting three barite, two anhydrite, and two gypsum samples from the Royal Ontario Museum that have repeatabilities for their SIMS measurements of better than ±0.39‰ and ±0.37‰ (1<i>s</i>) for oxygen and sulfur isotope ratios, respectively. Metrological splits of each of the seven materials were sent to multiple gas source isotope ratio mass spectrometry laboratories in order to establish their absolute <sup>18</sup>O/<sup>16</sup>O and <sup>34</sup>S/<sup>32</sup>S ratios. The inter-laboratory results of GS-IRMS analyses yielded reasonably narrow ranges in δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>VSMOW</sub>, whereas larger variations in δ<sup>34</sup>S<sub>VCDT</sub> values were found between the results from the gas source laboratories. All samples have good reproducibility within laboratories of GS-IRMS 10<sup>3</sup>δ<sup>18</sup>O values of between ±0.24‰ and ±0.44‰ (1<i>s</i>). The reproducibility within laboratories of GS-IRMS 10<sup>3</sup>δ<sup>34</sup>S values range from ±0.07‰ to ±0.99‰ (1<i>s</i>). Here we also discuss some of the current analytical limitations affecting these isotope-mineral systems. A total of 256 metrological splits have been prepared from each of these seven materials; these aliquots will be made available to the global geochemical community.</p>","PeriodicalId":12631,"journal":{"name":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","volume":"48 1","pages":"179-205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barite, Anhydrite and Gypsum Reference Materials for In Situ Oxygen and Sulfur Isotope Ratio Measurements\",\"authors\":\"Bin Li,&nbsp;Michael Wiedenbeck,&nbsp;Frédéric Couffignal,&nbsp;Antonio M. Álvarez-Valero,&nbsp;Hui-Ming Bao,&nbsp;Chang-Fu Fan,&nbsp;Juan Han,&nbsp;Gui-Shan Jin,&nbsp;Yong-Bo Peng,&nbsp;Marcin Daniel Syczewski,&nbsp;Kimberly T. Tait,&nbsp;Franziska D.H. Wilke,&nbsp;Ulrich G. Wortmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ggr.12533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Secondary ion mass spectrometry was used to test the δ<sup>18</sup>O and δ<sup>34</sup>S nanogram-scale homogeneity of a suite of candidate sulfate minerals, ultimately selecting three barite, two anhydrite, and two gypsum samples from the Royal Ontario Museum that have repeatabilities for their SIMS measurements of better than ±0.39‰ and ±0.37‰ (1<i>s</i>) for oxygen and sulfur isotope ratios, respectively. Metrological splits of each of the seven materials were sent to multiple gas source isotope ratio mass spectrometry laboratories in order to establish their absolute <sup>18</sup>O/<sup>16</sup>O and <sup>34</sup>S/<sup>32</sup>S ratios. The inter-laboratory results of GS-IRMS analyses yielded reasonably narrow ranges in δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>VSMOW</sub>, whereas larger variations in δ<sup>34</sup>S<sub>VCDT</sub> values were found between the results from the gas source laboratories. All samples have good reproducibility within laboratories of GS-IRMS 10<sup>3</sup>δ<sup>18</sup>O values of between ±0.24‰ and ±0.44‰ (1<i>s</i>). The reproducibility within laboratories of GS-IRMS 10<sup>3</sup>δ<sup>34</sup>S values range from ±0.07‰ to ±0.99‰ (1<i>s</i>). Here we also discuss some of the current analytical limitations affecting these isotope-mineral systems. A total of 256 metrological splits have been prepared from each of these seven materials; these aliquots will be made available to the global geochemical community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"179-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12533\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12533","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用二次离子质谱法测试了一系列候选硫酸盐矿物的δ18O和δ34S纳米级均匀性,最终从安大略皇家博物馆挑选出了三个重晶石样本、两个无水石膏样本和两个石膏样本,这些样本的氧和硫同位素比的SIMS测量重复性分别优于±0.39‰和±0.37‰(1s)。七种材料中每种材料的计量分样都被送往多个气源同位素比质谱实验室,以确定其 18O/16O 和 34S/32S 的绝对比值。各实验室之间的 GS-IRMS 分析结果显示,δ18OVSMOW 的范围相当小,而各气源实验室之间的 δ34SVCDT 值差异较大。所有样品的 GS-IRMS 103δ18O 值在实验室内部都具有良好的重现性,介于 ±0.24‰ 和 ±0.44‰ 之间(1s)。实验室内 GS-IRMS 103δ34S 值的重现性在±0.07‰到±0.99‰(1s)之间。在此,我们还讨论了目前影响这些同位素-矿物系统的一些分析限制。从这七种材料中,每种材料都制备了 256 个计量分样;这些分样将提供给全球地球化学界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barite, Anhydrite and Gypsum Reference Materials for In Situ Oxygen and Sulfur Isotope Ratio Measurements

Secondary ion mass spectrometry was used to test the δ18O and δ34S nanogram-scale homogeneity of a suite of candidate sulfate minerals, ultimately selecting three barite, two anhydrite, and two gypsum samples from the Royal Ontario Museum that have repeatabilities for their SIMS measurements of better than ±0.39‰ and ±0.37‰ (1s) for oxygen and sulfur isotope ratios, respectively. Metrological splits of each of the seven materials were sent to multiple gas source isotope ratio mass spectrometry laboratories in order to establish their absolute 18O/16O and 34S/32S ratios. The inter-laboratory results of GS-IRMS analyses yielded reasonably narrow ranges in δ18OVSMOW, whereas larger variations in δ34SVCDT values were found between the results from the gas source laboratories. All samples have good reproducibility within laboratories of GS-IRMS 103δ18O values of between ±0.24‰ and ±0.44‰ (1s). The reproducibility within laboratories of GS-IRMS 103δ34S values range from ±0.07‰ to ±0.99‰ (1s). Here we also discuss some of the current analytical limitations affecting these isotope-mineral systems. A total of 256 metrological splits have been prepared from each of these seven materials; these aliquots will be made available to the global geochemical community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geostandards & Geoanalytical Research is an international journal dedicated to advancing the science of reference materials, analytical techniques and data quality relevant to the chemical analysis of geological and environmental samples. Papers are accepted for publication following peer review.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Editorial IAG Membership Information GGR Handbook of Rock and Mineral Analysis Chapter 1 (Part 1) Geoanalytical Metrology GGR Handbook of Rock and Mineral Analysis Chapter 6 (Part 1) Principles and Practice of X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry –1: Fundamentals of XRF and Matrix Corrections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1