欧洲非标准员工的幸福感:工人价值取向和社会支持来源的作用

IF 1.8 Q2 SOCIOLOGY International Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2023-10-25 DOI:10.1080/00207659.2023.2273046
Filip Majetić, Chiara Bassetti, Miroslav Rajter
{"title":"欧洲非标准员工的幸福感:工人价值取向和社会支持来源的作用","authors":"Filip Majetić, Chiara Bassetti, Miroslav Rajter","doi":"10.1080/00207659.2023.2273046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis study explored self-reported happiness among nonstandard (part-time, temporary, and no-contract) employees in Europe. Rooted in Theory of basic individual values and the modified Buffer hypothesis, it focused on the role of worker’s value orientation and sources of social support/social buffers. Data stemmed from European Social Survey Citation2018 and Eurostat datasets, and was analyzed using multilevel modeling. As an introductory insight, “feeling good”, i.e., happiness was found associated with the respondents’ age, sex, and income – in favor of younger employees, women, and those with higher salaries. The value orientation identified as beneficial for happiness included being an “open hedonist” and not caring much about being “powerful”. Related to social buffers, happiness was positively associated with household-provided support, whereas support from welfare state policies, trade unions, and prosperous socio-economic environment had no effect.Keywords: Nonstandard employeesEuropehappinessopen hedonismpoweraged identitiesgendered identitieshousehold supportincome Disclosure statementThe authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.Notes1 According to Warr’s (Citation2018) analysis of ESS 2006 and 2012 datasets, Self-direction and Stimulation were the only two Schwartz’s basic values in which self-employed workers/entrepreneurs differentiated from employees.2 The (ICC and MLM) calculations were performed using the estimation method of Maximum Likelihood (instead of Restricted Maximum Likelihood) because the number of our Level-2 units/groups/countries is not particularly small − which made the analyses less prone to yielding biased estimates (Browne and Draper, Citation2006).3 Consider how the items are introduced in ESS questionnaire: “Now I will briefly describe some people. Please listen to each description and tell me how much each person is or is not like you.”Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar.","PeriodicalId":45362,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sociology","volume":"24 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Happiness among Nonstandard Employees in Europe: The Role of the Worker’s Value Orientation and Sources of Social Support\",\"authors\":\"Filip Majetić, Chiara Bassetti, Miroslav Rajter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00207659.2023.2273046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThis study explored self-reported happiness among nonstandard (part-time, temporary, and no-contract) employees in Europe. Rooted in Theory of basic individual values and the modified Buffer hypothesis, it focused on the role of worker’s value orientation and sources of social support/social buffers. Data stemmed from European Social Survey Citation2018 and Eurostat datasets, and was analyzed using multilevel modeling. As an introductory insight, “feeling good”, i.e., happiness was found associated with the respondents’ age, sex, and income – in favor of younger employees, women, and those with higher salaries. The value orientation identified as beneficial for happiness included being an “open hedonist” and not caring much about being “powerful”. Related to social buffers, happiness was positively associated with household-provided support, whereas support from welfare state policies, trade unions, and prosperous socio-economic environment had no effect.Keywords: Nonstandard employeesEuropehappinessopen hedonismpoweraged identitiesgendered identitieshousehold supportincome Disclosure statementThe authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.Notes1 According to Warr’s (Citation2018) analysis of ESS 2006 and 2012 datasets, Self-direction and Stimulation were the only two Schwartz’s basic values in which self-employed workers/entrepreneurs differentiated from employees.2 The (ICC and MLM) calculations were performed using the estimation method of Maximum Likelihood (instead of Restricted Maximum Likelihood) because the number of our Level-2 units/groups/countries is not particularly small − which made the analyses less prone to yielding biased estimates (Browne and Draper, Citation2006).3 Consider how the items are introduced in ESS questionnaire: “Now I will briefly describe some people. Please listen to each description and tell me how much each person is or is not like you.”Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sociology\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2023.2273046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2023.2273046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究探讨了欧洲非标准(兼职、临时和无合同)员工的自我幸福感。在个人基本价值理论和修正缓冲假设的基础上,研究了工人价值取向的作用和社会支持/社会缓冲的来源。数据来源于欧洲社会调查Citation2018和欧盟统计局的数据集,并使用多层模型进行分析。首先,“感觉良好”,即幸福感与受访者的年龄、性别和收入有关——年轻员工、女性和薪水较高的员工更受青睐。被认为对幸福有益的价值取向包括做一个“开放的享乐主义者”,不太在乎是否“强大”。与社会缓冲相关,幸福感与家庭提供的支持呈正相关,而福利国家政策、工会和繁荣的社会经济环境的支持则没有影响。关键词:非标准员工欧洲幸福感开放享乐主义赋权身份性别身份家庭支持收入披露声明作者没有与本文内容相关的竞争利益需要声明注1根据Warr (Citation2018)对ESS 2006年和2012年数据集的分析,自我指导和激励是施瓦茨仅有的两个个体经营者/企业家区别于员工的基本价值观(ICC和MLM)计算是使用最大似然(而不是限制最大似然)的估计方法进行的,因为我们的二级单位/组/国家的数量并不是特别小,这使得分析不太容易产生有偏见的估计(Browne和Draper, Citation2006)考虑一下ESS问卷中的项目是如何引入的:“现在我将简要描述一些人。请听每一个描述,并告诉我每个人有多少像你或不像你。”本研究得到了社会科学研究所Ivo Pilar的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Happiness among Nonstandard Employees in Europe: The Role of the Worker’s Value Orientation and Sources of Social Support
AbstractThis study explored self-reported happiness among nonstandard (part-time, temporary, and no-contract) employees in Europe. Rooted in Theory of basic individual values and the modified Buffer hypothesis, it focused on the role of worker’s value orientation and sources of social support/social buffers. Data stemmed from European Social Survey Citation2018 and Eurostat datasets, and was analyzed using multilevel modeling. As an introductory insight, “feeling good”, i.e., happiness was found associated with the respondents’ age, sex, and income – in favor of younger employees, women, and those with higher salaries. The value orientation identified as beneficial for happiness included being an “open hedonist” and not caring much about being “powerful”. Related to social buffers, happiness was positively associated with household-provided support, whereas support from welfare state policies, trade unions, and prosperous socio-economic environment had no effect.Keywords: Nonstandard employeesEuropehappinessopen hedonismpoweraged identitiesgendered identitieshousehold supportincome Disclosure statementThe authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.Notes1 According to Warr’s (Citation2018) analysis of ESS 2006 and 2012 datasets, Self-direction and Stimulation were the only two Schwartz’s basic values in which self-employed workers/entrepreneurs differentiated from employees.2 The (ICC and MLM) calculations were performed using the estimation method of Maximum Likelihood (instead of Restricted Maximum Likelihood) because the number of our Level-2 units/groups/countries is not particularly small − which made the analyses less prone to yielding biased estimates (Browne and Draper, Citation2006).3 Consider how the items are introduced in ESS questionnaire: “Now I will briefly describe some people. Please listen to each description and tell me how much each person is or is not like you.”Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Including Marine-Related Items in the ISSP Environment Module is Important for a More Holistic Measure of Public Environmental Perceptions Automated Futures, Altered Priorities: The Impact of Technological Change on Environmental Attitudes and Policies Do “environmental losers” pay the price? The role of individual and country vulnerabilities in the relationship between environmental concern and willingness to pay to protect the environment Varying Vistas: Exploring the Uneven Impacts of World Society Integration on Cross-National Particulate Air Pollution Using Unconditional Quantile Regression What Prospects for Working Poor? Central Europe’s Experience with Dynamics of In-work Poverty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1