用于遍历Web的分布式子Web规范

IF 1.4 2区 数学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Theory and Practice of Logic Programming Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI:10.1017/s1471068423000054
BART BOGAERTS, BAS KETSMAN, YOUNES ZEBOUDJ, HEBA AAMER, RUBEN TAELMAN, RUBEN VERBORGH
{"title":"用于遍历Web的分布式子Web规范","authors":"BART BOGAERTS, BAS KETSMAN, YOUNES ZEBOUDJ, HEBA AAMER, RUBEN TAELMAN, RUBEN VERBORGH","doi":"10.1017/s1471068423000054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Link traversal–based query processing ( ltqp ), in which a sparql query is evaluated over a web of documents rather than a single dataset, is often seen as a theoretically interesting yet impractical technique. However, in a time where the hypercentralization of data has increasingly come under scrutiny, a decentralized Web of Data with a simple document-based interface is appealing, as it enables data publishers to control their data and access rights. While ( ltqp allows evaluating complex queries over such webs, it suffers from performance issues (due to the high number of documents containing data) as well as information quality concerns (due to the many sources providing such documents). In existing ltqp approaches, the burden of finding sources to query is entirely in the hands of the data consumer . In this paper, we argue that to solve these issues, data publishers should also be able to suggest sources of interest and guide the data consumer toward relevant and trustworthy data. We introduce a theoretical framework that enables such guided link traversal and study its properties. We illustrate with a theoretic example that this can improve query results and reduce the number of network requests. We evaluate our proposal experimentally on a virtual linked web with specifications and indeed observe that not just the data quality but also the efficiency of querying improves.","PeriodicalId":49436,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Logic Programming","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distributed Subweb Specifications for Traversing the Web\",\"authors\":\"BART BOGAERTS, BAS KETSMAN, YOUNES ZEBOUDJ, HEBA AAMER, RUBEN TAELMAN, RUBEN VERBORGH\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1471068423000054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Link traversal–based query processing ( ltqp ), in which a sparql query is evaluated over a web of documents rather than a single dataset, is often seen as a theoretically interesting yet impractical technique. However, in a time where the hypercentralization of data has increasingly come under scrutiny, a decentralized Web of Data with a simple document-based interface is appealing, as it enables data publishers to control their data and access rights. While ( ltqp allows evaluating complex queries over such webs, it suffers from performance issues (due to the high number of documents containing data) as well as information quality concerns (due to the many sources providing such documents). In existing ltqp approaches, the burden of finding sources to query is entirely in the hands of the data consumer . In this paper, we argue that to solve these issues, data publishers should also be able to suggest sources of interest and guide the data consumer toward relevant and trustworthy data. We introduce a theoretical framework that enables such guided link traversal and study its properties. We illustrate with a theoretic example that this can improve query results and reduce the number of network requests. We evaluate our proposal experimentally on a virtual linked web with specifications and indeed observe that not just the data quality but also the efficiency of querying improves.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Practice of Logic Programming\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Practice of Logic Programming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068423000054\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Logic Programming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068423000054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于链接遍历的查询处理(ltqp),其中sparql查询在文档网络而不是单个数据集上进行评估,通常被视为理论上有趣但不切实际的技术。然而,在数据的高度集中化日益受到严格审查的时代,具有简单的基于文档的界面的分散的数据Web很有吸引力,因为它使数据发布者能够控制他们的数据和访问权限。虽然ltqp允许评估此类web上的复杂查询,但它存在性能问题(由于包含数据的文档数量很多)和信息质量问题(由于提供此类文档的来源很多)。在现有的ltqp方法中,查找要查询的数据源的负担完全由数据使用者承担。在本文中,我们认为,为了解决这些问题,数据发布者还应该能够建议感兴趣的来源,并引导数据消费者获得相关和可信的数据。我们介绍了一个理论框架,使这种引导链接遍历和研究其性质。通过一个理论实例说明,这样可以改善查询结果,减少网络请求的数量。我们在一个有规范的虚拟链接网络上对我们的建议进行了实验评估,并确实观察到不仅数据质量而且查询效率都有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Distributed Subweb Specifications for Traversing the Web
Abstract Link traversal–based query processing ( ltqp ), in which a sparql query is evaluated over a web of documents rather than a single dataset, is often seen as a theoretically interesting yet impractical technique. However, in a time where the hypercentralization of data has increasingly come under scrutiny, a decentralized Web of Data with a simple document-based interface is appealing, as it enables data publishers to control their data and access rights. While ( ltqp allows evaluating complex queries over such webs, it suffers from performance issues (due to the high number of documents containing data) as well as information quality concerns (due to the many sources providing such documents). In existing ltqp approaches, the burden of finding sources to query is entirely in the hands of the data consumer . In this paper, we argue that to solve these issues, data publishers should also be able to suggest sources of interest and guide the data consumer toward relevant and trustworthy data. We introduce a theoretical framework that enables such guided link traversal and study its properties. We illustrate with a theoretic example that this can improve query results and reduce the number of network requests. We evaluate our proposal experimentally on a virtual linked web with specifications and indeed observe that not just the data quality but also the efficiency of querying improves.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming emphasises both the theory and practice of logic programming. Logic programming applies to all areas of artificial intelligence and computer science and is fundamental to them. Among the topics covered are AI applications that use logic programming, logic programming methodologies, specification, analysis and verification of systems, inductive logic programming, multi-relational data mining, natural language processing, knowledge representation, non-monotonic reasoning, semantic web reasoning, databases, implementations and architectures and constraint logic programming.
期刊最新文献
Metric Temporal Equilibrium Logic over Timed Traces Multi-Shot Answer Set Programming for Flexible Payroll Management Unit Testing in ASP Revisited: Language and Test-Driven Development Environment Evaluating Datalog Tools for Meta-reasoning over OWL 2 QL Model Explanation via Support Graphs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1