系统评估与教师专业发展的文献研究:意大利校校合作研究

Q3 Social Sciences Education and Self Development Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.26907/esd.18.3.05
Loredana Perla, Laura Sara Agrati, Viviana Vinci
{"title":"系统评估与教师专业发展的文献研究:意大利校校合作研究","authors":"Loredana Perla, Laura Sara Agrati, Viviana Vinci","doi":"10.26907/esd.18.3.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The continuous professional development of the teacher (CDP) has long been considered a prerequisite for the career and also for economic progress. CDP must be compared to standards which also make it possible to construct validation systems for the teachers’ skills in progress. The issue of teaching professionalism emerges also in the Italian legislative debate. We outline the research “The continuous professional development of the teacher: from the Improvement Plan to the appraisal”, conducted with a group of 33 schools in Southern Italy, the University of Bari and Unione Cattolica Italiana Insegnanti Medi (UCIIM, teachers’ association). The research project investigated the documentation of practices (connected with school’s self-evaluation, teacher evaluation and appraisal procedures) to improve the quality of teaching and to develop teacher professionalism. Three phases of research training occurred: a) The first phase involved a specific document analysis of “Rav” and “PdM” (acronyms for Self-Assessment Report - Rapporto di Auto-Valutazione - and Improvement Plan – Piano di Miglioramento). These documents were presented to the teaching staff and served as the primary materials for self-evaluation and decision-making. b) In the second phase, referred to as \"professional development,\" the skills audit and standards were introduced and collaboratively developed with the teachers. These documents formed the foundation of a teacher's professional development program. c) The third phase was dedicated to \"merit appraisal.\" It focused on selecting and analyzing the best appraisal sheets, which were considered the primary documents for assessing merit and promoting teachers. The school staff involved over 300 people, including teachers and principals. The results of the study underlined: the impact of the documentary practices introduced by school evaluation system on professional development; the importance of university-school collaboration supporting school-based assessment and teachers' professional development, shifting from a top-down orientation to more teacher self-regulating initiatives; the methodological-educational choice of principals as teachers’ tutors.","PeriodicalId":37225,"journal":{"name":"Education and Self Development","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Documentation for the System Evaluation and the Teachers Professional Development: A University-school Collaborative Research in Italy\",\"authors\":\"Loredana Perla, Laura Sara Agrati, Viviana Vinci\",\"doi\":\"10.26907/esd.18.3.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The continuous professional development of the teacher (CDP) has long been considered a prerequisite for the career and also for economic progress. CDP must be compared to standards which also make it possible to construct validation systems for the teachers’ skills in progress. The issue of teaching professionalism emerges also in the Italian legislative debate. We outline the research “The continuous professional development of the teacher: from the Improvement Plan to the appraisal”, conducted with a group of 33 schools in Southern Italy, the University of Bari and Unione Cattolica Italiana Insegnanti Medi (UCIIM, teachers’ association). The research project investigated the documentation of practices (connected with school’s self-evaluation, teacher evaluation and appraisal procedures) to improve the quality of teaching and to develop teacher professionalism. Three phases of research training occurred: a) The first phase involved a specific document analysis of “Rav” and “PdM” (acronyms for Self-Assessment Report - Rapporto di Auto-Valutazione - and Improvement Plan – Piano di Miglioramento). These documents were presented to the teaching staff and served as the primary materials for self-evaluation and decision-making. b) In the second phase, referred to as \\\"professional development,\\\" the skills audit and standards were introduced and collaboratively developed with the teachers. These documents formed the foundation of a teacher's professional development program. c) The third phase was dedicated to \\\"merit appraisal.\\\" It focused on selecting and analyzing the best appraisal sheets, which were considered the primary documents for assessing merit and promoting teachers. The school staff involved over 300 people, including teachers and principals. The results of the study underlined: the impact of the documentary practices introduced by school evaluation system on professional development; the importance of university-school collaboration supporting school-based assessment and teachers' professional development, shifting from a top-down orientation to more teacher self-regulating initiatives; the methodological-educational choice of principals as teachers’ tutors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Self Development\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Self Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.18.3.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Self Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.18.3.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教师的持续专业发展(CDP)一直被认为是职业发展的前提,也是经济发展的前提。CDP必须与标准进行比较,这些标准也使建立教师技能进步的验证系统成为可能。教学专业化问题也出现在意大利的立法辩论中。我们概述了一项研究“教师的持续专业发展:从改进计划到评估”,该研究由意大利南部的33所学校、巴里大学和意大利天主教协会(UCIIM,教师协会)进行。本研究项目以文献资料的方式(与学校自我评价、教师评价、考核程序相关)探讨提高教学质量、培养教师专业精神的实践。开展了三个阶段的研究培训:a)第一阶段涉及对“Rav”和“PdM”(Self-Assessment Report - Rapporto di Auto-Valutazione的缩写)和“改进计划- Piano di Miglioramento”的具体文件分析。这些文件被提交给教学人员,并作为自我评价和决策的主要材料。b)在第二阶段,称为“专业发展”,引入技能审计和标准,并与教师合作开发。这些文件构成了教师专业发展计划的基础。c)第三阶段致力于“绩效评估”。它侧重于选择和分析最佳评价表,这些评价表被认为是评估教师绩效和提升教师的主要文件。学校教职工超过300人,包括教师和校长。研究结果强调:学校评核制度引入纪录实践对专业发展的影响;校校合作支持校本评估和教师专业发展的重要性,从自上而下的导向转向更多的教师自我调节的主动;校长作为教师导师的方法论教育选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Documentation for the System Evaluation and the Teachers Professional Development: A University-school Collaborative Research in Italy
The continuous professional development of the teacher (CDP) has long been considered a prerequisite for the career and also for economic progress. CDP must be compared to standards which also make it possible to construct validation systems for the teachers’ skills in progress. The issue of teaching professionalism emerges also in the Italian legislative debate. We outline the research “The continuous professional development of the teacher: from the Improvement Plan to the appraisal”, conducted with a group of 33 schools in Southern Italy, the University of Bari and Unione Cattolica Italiana Insegnanti Medi (UCIIM, teachers’ association). The research project investigated the documentation of practices (connected with school’s self-evaluation, teacher evaluation and appraisal procedures) to improve the quality of teaching and to develop teacher professionalism. Three phases of research training occurred: a) The first phase involved a specific document analysis of “Rav” and “PdM” (acronyms for Self-Assessment Report - Rapporto di Auto-Valutazione - and Improvement Plan – Piano di Miglioramento). These documents were presented to the teaching staff and served as the primary materials for self-evaluation and decision-making. b) In the second phase, referred to as "professional development," the skills audit and standards were introduced and collaboratively developed with the teachers. These documents formed the foundation of a teacher's professional development program. c) The third phase was dedicated to "merit appraisal." It focused on selecting and analyzing the best appraisal sheets, which were considered the primary documents for assessing merit and promoting teachers. The school staff involved over 300 people, including teachers and principals. The results of the study underlined: the impact of the documentary practices introduced by school evaluation system on professional development; the importance of university-school collaboration supporting school-based assessment and teachers' professional development, shifting from a top-down orientation to more teacher self-regulating initiatives; the methodological-educational choice of principals as teachers’ tutors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Self Development
Education and Self Development Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Documentation for the System Evaluation and the Teachers Professional Development: A University-school Collaborative Research in Italy Competence of the Modern Educator: In Search of Finding Values (Brazilian case) Cognitive Regulation of Junior Bilingual Schoolchildren in the Process of Learning a Third Language Formation of the Identity of University Students Prone to Deviant Behavior Development of Multicultural Education in Tatarstan and Kazakhstan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1