在线精神科户外服务的患者满意度

Abdul Qadir Jilani, ARISH KHAN, SALONI SALONI, SESHAN KUMAR, JAI SINGH, KUSHAGRA VARMA, ALEEM SIDDIQUI, REEMA SINHA
{"title":"在线精神科户外服务的患者满意度","authors":"Abdul Qadir Jilani, ARISH KHAN, SALONI SALONI, SESHAN KUMAR, JAI SINGH, KUSHAGRA VARMA, ALEEM SIDDIQUI, REEMA SINHA","doi":"10.17816/cp5597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 global pandemic exposed gaps in the treatment of common physical and mental disorders that had to do with things like lockdowns, poor convenience, fear of contracting COVID, and economic constraints. Hence, to address these treatment gaps while also limiting exposure to the COVID-19 infection, telemedicine in the form of telephone and internet consultations has increasingly become the recourse around the world. Our center adopted this trend and also launched a telepsychiatry initiative in order to better cater to the needs of patients with pre-existing mental health disorders and to ensure regular follow-ups and compliance with prescription regiments.
 AIM: The present study aimed to assess the level of patient satisfaction with the online psychiatric services/telepsychiatry.
 METHODS: The sample consisted of 100 patients with pre-existing mental health disorders. This was a cross-sectional study lasting 6 months. The DigiDoc app by Hospital Information Software (HIS) software, which is used to manage a patients appointment schedule, relevant clinical and lab details, along with follow-up prescriptions, was used to follow the selected patients for the purpose of this study. This software also provides a digital platform for video calls for online consultation. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaires-8 (CSQ-8) was employed to collect patient data for analysis.
 RESULTS: The mean total CSQ-8 score of the study sample was 21.015.80 (832), which corresponds to a low-to-moderate level of satisfaction with online psychiatric services/telepsychiatry. Most patients (45%) reported low satisfaction levels, followed by 37% who reported moderate levels of satisfaction. Only 18% of patients reported higher satisfaction with telepsychiatry.
 CONCLUSION: Despite the psychiatrists ability to provide adequate professional advice and psychoeducation through online psychiatric services, patients level of satisfaction proved moderate-to-low. This suggests a need to design standard protocols and guidelines in the search and provision of consultation services on online psychiatric service platforms that could help enhance patients levels of satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":262442,"journal":{"name":"Consortium Psychiatricum","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Level of Patient Satisfaction with Online Psychiatric Outdoor Services\",\"authors\":\"Abdul Qadir Jilani, ARISH KHAN, SALONI SALONI, SESHAN KUMAR, JAI SINGH, KUSHAGRA VARMA, ALEEM SIDDIQUI, REEMA SINHA\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/cp5597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 global pandemic exposed gaps in the treatment of common physical and mental disorders that had to do with things like lockdowns, poor convenience, fear of contracting COVID, and economic constraints. Hence, to address these treatment gaps while also limiting exposure to the COVID-19 infection, telemedicine in the form of telephone and internet consultations has increasingly become the recourse around the world. Our center adopted this trend and also launched a telepsychiatry initiative in order to better cater to the needs of patients with pre-existing mental health disorders and to ensure regular follow-ups and compliance with prescription regiments.
 AIM: The present study aimed to assess the level of patient satisfaction with the online psychiatric services/telepsychiatry.
 METHODS: The sample consisted of 100 patients with pre-existing mental health disorders. This was a cross-sectional study lasting 6 months. The DigiDoc app by Hospital Information Software (HIS) software, which is used to manage a patients appointment schedule, relevant clinical and lab details, along with follow-up prescriptions, was used to follow the selected patients for the purpose of this study. This software also provides a digital platform for video calls for online consultation. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaires-8 (CSQ-8) was employed to collect patient data for analysis.
 RESULTS: The mean total CSQ-8 score of the study sample was 21.015.80 (832), which corresponds to a low-to-moderate level of satisfaction with online psychiatric services/telepsychiatry. Most patients (45%) reported low satisfaction levels, followed by 37% who reported moderate levels of satisfaction. Only 18% of patients reported higher satisfaction with telepsychiatry.
 CONCLUSION: Despite the psychiatrists ability to provide adequate professional advice and psychoeducation through online psychiatric services, patients level of satisfaction proved moderate-to-low. This suggests a need to design standard protocols and guidelines in the search and provision of consultation services on online psychiatric service platforms that could help enhance patients levels of satisfaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Consortium Psychiatricum\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Consortium Psychiatricum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/cp5597\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consortium Psychiatricum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/cp5597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)全球大流行暴露了常见身心障碍治疗方面的差距,这些差距与封锁、便利性差、害怕感染COVID以及经济限制等因素有关。因此,为了解决这些治疗差距,同时限制对COVID-19感染的暴露,电话和互联网咨询形式的远程医疗日益成为世界各地的求助手段。我们中心顺应了这一趋势,并开展了一项远程精神病学倡议,以更好地满足已有精神健康障碍患者的需求,并确保定期随访和遵守处方方案。目的:本研究旨在评估患者对网络精神病学服务/远程精神病学的满意度。 方法:样本包括100例既往存在精神健康障碍的患者。这是一项持续6个月的横断面研究。医院信息软件(HIS)软件的DigiDoc应用程序用于管理患者预约时间表,相关临床和实验室细节以及随访处方,用于跟踪本研究的选定患者。该软件还为在线咨询提供了视频通话的数字平台。采用客户满意度问卷-8 (CSQ-8)收集患者资料进行分析。 结果:研究样本的CSQ-8平均总分为21.015.80分(832分),对在线精神科服务/远程精神科的满意度处于中低水平。大多数患者(45%)报告满意度较低,其次是37%报告满意度中等。只有18%的患者对远程精神病学有更高的满意度。 结论:尽管精神科医生能够通过在线精神科服务提供足够的专业咨询和心理教育,但患者的满意度处于中低水平。这表明需要在在线精神病学服务平台上设计标准的协议和指南来搜索和提供咨询服务,以帮助提高患者的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Level of Patient Satisfaction with Online Psychiatric Outdoor Services
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 global pandemic exposed gaps in the treatment of common physical and mental disorders that had to do with things like lockdowns, poor convenience, fear of contracting COVID, and economic constraints. Hence, to address these treatment gaps while also limiting exposure to the COVID-19 infection, telemedicine in the form of telephone and internet consultations has increasingly become the recourse around the world. Our center adopted this trend and also launched a telepsychiatry initiative in order to better cater to the needs of patients with pre-existing mental health disorders and to ensure regular follow-ups and compliance with prescription regiments. AIM: The present study aimed to assess the level of patient satisfaction with the online psychiatric services/telepsychiatry. METHODS: The sample consisted of 100 patients with pre-existing mental health disorders. This was a cross-sectional study lasting 6 months. The DigiDoc app by Hospital Information Software (HIS) software, which is used to manage a patients appointment schedule, relevant clinical and lab details, along with follow-up prescriptions, was used to follow the selected patients for the purpose of this study. This software also provides a digital platform for video calls for online consultation. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaires-8 (CSQ-8) was employed to collect patient data for analysis. RESULTS: The mean total CSQ-8 score of the study sample was 21.015.80 (832), which corresponds to a low-to-moderate level of satisfaction with online psychiatric services/telepsychiatry. Most patients (45%) reported low satisfaction levels, followed by 37% who reported moderate levels of satisfaction. Only 18% of patients reported higher satisfaction with telepsychiatry. CONCLUSION: Despite the psychiatrists ability to provide adequate professional advice and psychoeducation through online psychiatric services, patients level of satisfaction proved moderate-to-low. This suggests a need to design standard protocols and guidelines in the search and provision of consultation services on online psychiatric service platforms that could help enhance patients levels of satisfaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dhat delusion in individuals with paranoid personality traits: A case series Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome in a Recently Abstinent Chronic User: Assessment and Intervention The interdisciplinary diagnostics of autism spectrum disorder using DC:0-5TM — a case report Serum interleukin-6 in schizophrenia: associations with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics Corrigendum to “Schizophrenia: a narrative review of etiological and diagnostic issues” (Consortium Psychiatricum, 2022, Volume 3, Issue 3, doi: 10.17816/CP132)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1