法律案例检索的意图分类

IF 5.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACM Transactions on Information Systems Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1145/3626093
Yunqiu Shao, Haitao Li, Yueyue Wu, Yiqun Liu, Qingyao Ai, Jiaxin Mao, Yixiao Ma, Shaoping Ma
{"title":"法律案例检索的意图分类","authors":"Yunqiu Shao, Haitao Li, Yueyue Wu, Yiqun Liu, Qingyao Ai, Jiaxin Mao, Yixiao Ma, Shaoping Ma","doi":"10.1145/3626093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal case retrieval is a special Information Retrieval (IR) task focusing on legal case documents. Depending on the downstream tasks of the retrieved case documents, users’ information needs in legal case retrieval could be significantly different from those in Web search and traditional ad-hoc retrieval tasks. While there are several studies that retrieve legal cases based on text similarity, the underlying search intents of legal retrieval users, as shown in this paper, are more complicated than that yet mostly unexplored. To this end, we present a novel hierarchical intent taxonomy of legal case retrieval. It consists of five intent types categorized by three criteria, i.e., search for Particular Case(s) , Characterization , Penalty , Procedure , and Interest . The taxonomy was constructed transparently and evaluated extensively through interviews, editorial user studies, and query log analysis. Through a laboratory user study, we reveal significant differences in user behavior and satisfaction under different search intents in legal case retrieval. Furthermore, we apply the proposed taxonomy to various downstream legal retrieval tasks, e.g., result ranking and satisfaction prediction, and demonstrate its effectiveness. Our work provides important insights into the understanding of user intents in legal case retrieval and potentially leads to better retrieval techniques in the legal domain, such as intent-aware ranking strategies and evaluation methodologies.","PeriodicalId":50936,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Information Systems","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Intent Taxonomy of Legal Case Retrieval\",\"authors\":\"Yunqiu Shao, Haitao Li, Yueyue Wu, Yiqun Liu, Qingyao Ai, Jiaxin Mao, Yixiao Ma, Shaoping Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3626093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Legal case retrieval is a special Information Retrieval (IR) task focusing on legal case documents. Depending on the downstream tasks of the retrieved case documents, users’ information needs in legal case retrieval could be significantly different from those in Web search and traditional ad-hoc retrieval tasks. While there are several studies that retrieve legal cases based on text similarity, the underlying search intents of legal retrieval users, as shown in this paper, are more complicated than that yet mostly unexplored. To this end, we present a novel hierarchical intent taxonomy of legal case retrieval. It consists of five intent types categorized by three criteria, i.e., search for Particular Case(s) , Characterization , Penalty , Procedure , and Interest . The taxonomy was constructed transparently and evaluated extensively through interviews, editorial user studies, and query log analysis. Through a laboratory user study, we reveal significant differences in user behavior and satisfaction under different search intents in legal case retrieval. Furthermore, we apply the proposed taxonomy to various downstream legal retrieval tasks, e.g., result ranking and satisfaction prediction, and demonstrate its effectiveness. Our work provides important insights into the understanding of user intents in legal case retrieval and potentially leads to better retrieval techniques in the legal domain, such as intent-aware ranking strategies and evaluation methodologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3626093\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3626093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

法律案件检索是一项针对法律案件文书的特殊信息检索任务。根据所检索的案件文档的下游任务,法律案件检索中的用户信息需求可能与Web搜索和传统的临时检索任务中的用户信息需求有很大不同。虽然有一些基于文本相似度检索法律案例的研究,但正如本文所示,法律检索用户的潜在搜索意图比这更复杂,而且大多未被探索。为此,我们提出了一种新的法律案例检索的层次意图分类法。它由五种意图类型组成,按三个标准分类,即搜索特定案例、特征描述、处罚、程序和利益。分类法是透明地构建的,并通过访谈、编辑用户研究和查询日志分析进行了广泛的评估。通过实验室用户研究,我们发现不同检索意图下的法律案例检索用户行为和满意度存在显著差异。此外,我们将所提出的分类方法应用于各种下游法律检索任务,如结果排序和满意度预测,并证明了其有效性。我们的工作为理解法律案例检索中的用户意图提供了重要的见解,并可能导致法律领域中更好的检索技术,例如意图感知排序策略和评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Intent Taxonomy of Legal Case Retrieval
Legal case retrieval is a special Information Retrieval (IR) task focusing on legal case documents. Depending on the downstream tasks of the retrieved case documents, users’ information needs in legal case retrieval could be significantly different from those in Web search and traditional ad-hoc retrieval tasks. While there are several studies that retrieve legal cases based on text similarity, the underlying search intents of legal retrieval users, as shown in this paper, are more complicated than that yet mostly unexplored. To this end, we present a novel hierarchical intent taxonomy of legal case retrieval. It consists of five intent types categorized by three criteria, i.e., search for Particular Case(s) , Characterization , Penalty , Procedure , and Interest . The taxonomy was constructed transparently and evaluated extensively through interviews, editorial user studies, and query log analysis. Through a laboratory user study, we reveal significant differences in user behavior and satisfaction under different search intents in legal case retrieval. Furthermore, we apply the proposed taxonomy to various downstream legal retrieval tasks, e.g., result ranking and satisfaction prediction, and demonstrate its effectiveness. Our work provides important insights into the understanding of user intents in legal case retrieval and potentially leads to better retrieval techniques in the legal domain, such as intent-aware ranking strategies and evaluation methodologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Information Systems
ACM Transactions on Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
165
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; accounts of applications of existing information retrieval techniques that shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of the techniques; formalization of new information retrieval or information seeking tasks and of methods for evaluating the performance on those tasks; development of content (text, image, speech, video, etc) analysis methods to support information retrieval and information seeking; development of computational models of user information preferences and interaction behaviors; creation and analysis of evaluation methodologies for information retrieval and information seeking; or surveys of existing work that propose a significant synthesis. The information retrieval scope of ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) appeals to industry practitioners for its wealth of creative ideas, and to academic researchers for its descriptions of their colleagues'' work.
期刊最新文献
ROGER: Ranking-oriented Generative Retrieval Adversarial Item Promotion on Visually-Aware Recommender Systems by Guided Diffusion Bridging Dense and Sparse Maximum Inner Product Search MvStHgL: Multi-view Hypergraph Learning with Spatial-temporal Periodic Interests for Next POI Recommendation City Matters! A Dual-Target Cross-City Sequential POI Recommendation Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1