在秒.com和罗盘.com的在线媒体上,对TikTokers Bima的网络批评人士(TikTokers Bima criticism)的非法信息和电子交易指控的新闻框架

Muhammad Iqbal
{"title":"在秒.com和罗盘.com的在线媒体上,对TikTokers Bima的网络批评人士(TikTokers Bima criticism)的非法信息和电子交易指控的新闻框架","authors":"Muhammad Iqbal","doi":"10.35326/medialog.v6i2.4061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media provides freedom of opinion and expression for its users. In Indonesia, the use of social media is regulated in the 2008 ITE Law. This study examines the reporting of one of the ITE Law controversy cases in the form of accusations of hate speech containing SARA against Bima Yudho Saputro who criticized Lampung as \"Dajjal\". The purpose of this study is to find out how the media Detik.com and Kompas.com in framing news cases of alleged violations of the ITE Law using Robert N. Entman's framing device. This research includes framing analysis research with qualitative approach methods. The results of this study are seen from the Define Problem framing tool, the media Detik.com and Kompas.com trying to define cases of alleged violations of the ITE Law by Bima as cases that do not need to be brought into the realm of law, evidenced by headlines that tend to write responses from several parties. Diagnose Causes, a framing developed by Detik.com and Kompas.com media is a report of violations of the ITE Law against Bima. Make Moral Judgement, it is seen Detik.com highlight the statement of the family responding to the case as a lesson for various parties, while Kompas.com highlight statements from various parties who consider the report against Bima to be a criminalization of human rights and a violation of democratic values. Treatment Recommendation, Detik.com and Kompas.com highlight the resolution of existing problems by writing down the attitude of the Lampung Regional Police regarding the Bima case.","PeriodicalId":500820,"journal":{"name":"Medialog : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framing Berita Kasus Tuduhan Pelanggaran UU Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) terhadap TikTokers Bima Kritik Lampung di Media Online Detik.com dan Kompas.com\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Iqbal\",\"doi\":\"10.35326/medialog.v6i2.4061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social media provides freedom of opinion and expression for its users. In Indonesia, the use of social media is regulated in the 2008 ITE Law. This study examines the reporting of one of the ITE Law controversy cases in the form of accusations of hate speech containing SARA against Bima Yudho Saputro who criticized Lampung as \\\"Dajjal\\\". The purpose of this study is to find out how the media Detik.com and Kompas.com in framing news cases of alleged violations of the ITE Law using Robert N. Entman's framing device. This research includes framing analysis research with qualitative approach methods. The results of this study are seen from the Define Problem framing tool, the media Detik.com and Kompas.com trying to define cases of alleged violations of the ITE Law by Bima as cases that do not need to be brought into the realm of law, evidenced by headlines that tend to write responses from several parties. Diagnose Causes, a framing developed by Detik.com and Kompas.com media is a report of violations of the ITE Law against Bima. Make Moral Judgement, it is seen Detik.com highlight the statement of the family responding to the case as a lesson for various parties, while Kompas.com highlight statements from various parties who consider the report against Bima to be a criminalization of human rights and a violation of democratic values. Treatment Recommendation, Detik.com and Kompas.com highlight the resolution of existing problems by writing down the attitude of the Lampung Regional Police regarding the Bima case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":500820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medialog : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medialog : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35326/medialog.v6i2.4061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medialog : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35326/medialog.v6i2.4061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社交媒体为用户提供了意见和表达的自由。在印度尼西亚,社交媒体的使用受到2008年《信息技术与传播法》的监管。本研究检视其中一宗资讯科技法争议案的报导,以包含SARA的仇恨言论指控的形式,针对批评楠榜为“Dajjal”的Bima Yudho Saputro。本研究的目的是找出媒体Detik.com和Kompas.com如何使用Robert N. Entman的框架装置来构建涉嫌违反资讯科技法的新闻案件。本研究包括框架分析研究和定性研究方法。这项研究的结果可以从定义问题框架工具中看到,媒体Detik.com和Kompas.com试图将Bima涉嫌违反ITE法的案件定义为不需要纳入法律领域的案件,这一点可以从标题中得到证明,这些标题往往写有多方的回应。“诊断原因”是由Detik.com和Kompas.com媒体开发的框架,是一份针对比马违反ITE法律的报告。“做出道德判断”,Detik.com突出了家庭对案件的回应,作为各方的教训,而Kompas.com则突出了各方的声明,他们认为针对Bima的报告是对人权的刑事定罪,违反了民主价值观。Treatment Recommendation、Detik.com和Kompas.com通过记录楠枫地方警察对Bima事件的态度,突出了解决现有问题的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Framing Berita Kasus Tuduhan Pelanggaran UU Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) terhadap TikTokers Bima Kritik Lampung di Media Online Detik.com dan Kompas.com
Social media provides freedom of opinion and expression for its users. In Indonesia, the use of social media is regulated in the 2008 ITE Law. This study examines the reporting of one of the ITE Law controversy cases in the form of accusations of hate speech containing SARA against Bima Yudho Saputro who criticized Lampung as "Dajjal". The purpose of this study is to find out how the media Detik.com and Kompas.com in framing news cases of alleged violations of the ITE Law using Robert N. Entman's framing device. This research includes framing analysis research with qualitative approach methods. The results of this study are seen from the Define Problem framing tool, the media Detik.com and Kompas.com trying to define cases of alleged violations of the ITE Law by Bima as cases that do not need to be brought into the realm of law, evidenced by headlines that tend to write responses from several parties. Diagnose Causes, a framing developed by Detik.com and Kompas.com media is a report of violations of the ITE Law against Bima. Make Moral Judgement, it is seen Detik.com highlight the statement of the family responding to the case as a lesson for various parties, while Kompas.com highlight statements from various parties who consider the report against Bima to be a criminalization of human rights and a violation of democratic values. Treatment Recommendation, Detik.com and Kompas.com highlight the resolution of existing problems by writing down the attitude of the Lampung Regional Police regarding the Bima case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Representasi Nasionalisme dalam Pembekalan LPDP Sri Mulyani POLA INTERAKSI SOSIAL MAHASISWA DALAM PROSES KOMUNIKASI BELAJAR E-ELEARNING KULINO Framing Berita Kasus Tuduhan Pelanggaran UU Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) terhadap TikTokers Bima Kritik Lampung di Media Online Detik.com dan Kompas.com Peran Humas dalam Pengelolaan Konten Harian Instagram @infobsdtol di PT Bintaro Serpong Damai KOMUNIKASI INTERPERSONAL PERAWAT DENGAN LANSIA DALAM MEMBANGUN KEDEKATAN DI UPTD PANTI SOSIAL TRESNA WERDHA NIRWANA PURI DINAS SOSIAL PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1