将学生的比例推理水平与他们对公平游戏的理解联系起来

María Magdalena Gea, Luis Armando Hernández-Solís, Carmen Batanero, Rocío Álvarez-Arroyo
{"title":"将学生的比例推理水平与他们对公平游戏的理解联系起来","authors":"María Magdalena Gea, Luis Armando Hernández-Solís, Carmen Batanero, Rocío Álvarez-Arroyo","doi":"10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp663-682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the relationship between proportional reasoning and understanding fair games in Costa Rican students. We conducted a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the answers to six items on comparing ratios of increasing difficulty level and another item on prize estimation in a fair game. We describe the strategies employed and the semiotic conflicts detected in 292 Costa Rican students from Grades 6 to 10 (11-16-year-olds), comparing the findings with those established in previous research. The results show an increase in the level of proportional reasoning with the grade, although the age at which the higher levels are reached is lower than that assumed by Noelting. The percentage of students applying correct strategies in the fair game problem also increases with grade, and a relationship between the understanding of fair game and the level of proportional reasoning is observed.","PeriodicalId":37090,"journal":{"name":"Journal on Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relating students’ proportional reasoning level and their understanding of fair games\",\"authors\":\"María Magdalena Gea, Luis Armando Hernández-Solís, Carmen Batanero, Rocío Álvarez-Arroyo\",\"doi\":\"10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp663-682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes the relationship between proportional reasoning and understanding fair games in Costa Rican students. We conducted a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the answers to six items on comparing ratios of increasing difficulty level and another item on prize estimation in a fair game. We describe the strategies employed and the semiotic conflicts detected in 292 Costa Rican students from Grades 6 to 10 (11-16-year-olds), comparing the findings with those established in previous research. The results show an increase in the level of proportional reasoning with the grade, although the age at which the higher levels are reached is lower than that assumed by Noelting. The percentage of students applying correct strategies in the fair game problem also increases with grade, and a relationship between the understanding of fair game and the level of proportional reasoning is observed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal on Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal on Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp663-682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp663-682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了哥斯达黎加学生比例推理与公平游戏理解之间的关系。我们对公平游戏中难度等级增加的比较比率的6个题目和奖金估计的另一个题目的答案进行了定量和定性分析。我们描述了292名哥斯达黎加6至10年级(11-16岁)学生所采用的策略和发现的符号学冲突,并将研究结果与之前的研究结果进行了比较。结果表明,比例推理水平随着年级的增加而增加,尽管达到较高水平的年龄低于Noelting的假设。学生在公平博弈问题中使用正确策略的比例也随着年级的增加而增加,并且观察到公平博弈理解与比例推理水平之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relating students’ proportional reasoning level and their understanding of fair games
This paper analyzes the relationship between proportional reasoning and understanding fair games in Costa Rican students. We conducted a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the answers to six items on comparing ratios of increasing difficulty level and another item on prize estimation in a fair game. We describe the strategies employed and the semiotic conflicts detected in 292 Costa Rican students from Grades 6 to 10 (11-16-year-olds), comparing the findings with those established in previous research. The results show an increase in the level of proportional reasoning with the grade, although the age at which the higher levels are reached is lower than that assumed by Noelting. The percentage of students applying correct strategies in the fair game problem also increases with grade, and a relationship between the understanding of fair game and the level of proportional reasoning is observed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal on Mathematics Education
Journal on Mathematics Education Mathematics-Mathematics (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
What explains early numeracy achievement: A comparison of South Africa and China Exploring default-interventionist interaction of thinking activity types on probability problem-solving Mathematics learning orientation: Mathematical creative thinking ability or creative disposition? Promoting socioeconomic equity through automatic formative assessment Aligning numeracy task design with SDG goals: Nutrition facts as a context for prospective mathematics teachers' problem posing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1