R P Mischak, C Foxall, L L Rosendorf, K Knebel, P J Scannon, L E Spitler
{"title":"人抗体对单克隆抗黑素瘤抗体蓖麻毒素A链免疫毒素XomaZyme-MEL组分的反应。","authors":"R P Mischak, C Foxall, L L Rosendorf, K Knebel, P J Scannon, L E Spitler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human antibody responses to immunotoxin components were evaluated in 21 melanoma patients who were treated with XomaZyme-MEL, a murine monoclonal antimelanoma antibody-ricin A chain conjugate. Twenty of the 21 melanoma patients produced antibodies against ricin A chain, while 15 of 21 produced antibodies reactive with the murine monoclonal antibody component. Both IgM and IgG antibody responses were produced. Immunoglobulin responses were usually detected 1 to 2 weeks following initiation of therapy, with peak levels generally attained 2 to 4 weeks posttherapy. Titers of the anti-ricin A chain antibodies were generally higher than those of the antimurine monoclonal antibodies for the dose range tested. There was no clear correlation between the dose of immunotoxin administered and the antibody titer. By use of a competitive flow cytometry assay, antiidiotype responses were demonstrated in eight of 10 melanoma patients who had antimurine antibodies. Both the kinetics of appearance and the relative titers of the antiidiotype responses generally corresponded to the antimurine responses. The development of antimmunotoxin antibodies can reduce the therapeutic potential of immunotoxins through several mechanisms. The development of antibodies in a significant number of patients suggests that optimally effective, repeated courses of therapy will require some procedure for suppressing or abrogating the response against the immunotoxin.</p>","PeriodicalId":18809,"journal":{"name":"Molecular biotherapy","volume":"2 2","pages":"104-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human antibody responses to components of the monoclonal antimelanoma antibody ricin A chain immunotoxin XomaZyme-MEL.\",\"authors\":\"R P Mischak, C Foxall, L L Rosendorf, K Knebel, P J Scannon, L E Spitler\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Human antibody responses to immunotoxin components were evaluated in 21 melanoma patients who were treated with XomaZyme-MEL, a murine monoclonal antimelanoma antibody-ricin A chain conjugate. Twenty of the 21 melanoma patients produced antibodies against ricin A chain, while 15 of 21 produced antibodies reactive with the murine monoclonal antibody component. Both IgM and IgG antibody responses were produced. Immunoglobulin responses were usually detected 1 to 2 weeks following initiation of therapy, with peak levels generally attained 2 to 4 weeks posttherapy. Titers of the anti-ricin A chain antibodies were generally higher than those of the antimurine monoclonal antibodies for the dose range tested. There was no clear correlation between the dose of immunotoxin administered and the antibody titer. By use of a competitive flow cytometry assay, antiidiotype responses were demonstrated in eight of 10 melanoma patients who had antimurine antibodies. Both the kinetics of appearance and the relative titers of the antiidiotype responses generally corresponded to the antimurine responses. The development of antimmunotoxin antibodies can reduce the therapeutic potential of immunotoxins through several mechanisms. The development of antibodies in a significant number of patients suggests that optimally effective, repeated courses of therapy will require some procedure for suppressing or abrogating the response against the immunotoxin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular biotherapy\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"104-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular biotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular biotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Human antibody responses to components of the monoclonal antimelanoma antibody ricin A chain immunotoxin XomaZyme-MEL.
Human antibody responses to immunotoxin components were evaluated in 21 melanoma patients who were treated with XomaZyme-MEL, a murine monoclonal antimelanoma antibody-ricin A chain conjugate. Twenty of the 21 melanoma patients produced antibodies against ricin A chain, while 15 of 21 produced antibodies reactive with the murine monoclonal antibody component. Both IgM and IgG antibody responses were produced. Immunoglobulin responses were usually detected 1 to 2 weeks following initiation of therapy, with peak levels generally attained 2 to 4 weeks posttherapy. Titers of the anti-ricin A chain antibodies were generally higher than those of the antimurine monoclonal antibodies for the dose range tested. There was no clear correlation between the dose of immunotoxin administered and the antibody titer. By use of a competitive flow cytometry assay, antiidiotype responses were demonstrated in eight of 10 melanoma patients who had antimurine antibodies. Both the kinetics of appearance and the relative titers of the antiidiotype responses generally corresponded to the antimurine responses. The development of antimmunotoxin antibodies can reduce the therapeutic potential of immunotoxins through several mechanisms. The development of antibodies in a significant number of patients suggests that optimally effective, repeated courses of therapy will require some procedure for suppressing or abrogating the response against the immunotoxin.