非定常船岸相互作用:实验与计算预测的比较

IF 1.4 Q3 ENGINEERING, MARINE Ship Technology Research Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1080/09377255.2023.2275372
G. Delefortrie, J. Verwilligen, C. Kochanowski, J. A. Pinkster, Z. M. Yuan, Y. H. Liu, M. Kastens, W. Van Hoydonck, H. J. M. Pinkster, E. Lataire
{"title":"非定常船岸相互作用:实验与计算预测的比较","authors":"G. Delefortrie, J. Verwilligen, C. Kochanowski, J. A. Pinkster, Z. M. Yuan, Y. H. Liu, M. Kastens, W. Van Hoydonck, H. J. M. Pinkster, E. Lataire","doi":"10.1080/09377255.2023.2275372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTA collaborative exercise is presented where different numerical methods were used to recreate the forces acting on a ship model while executing captive model tests along a channel which has an unsteady cross section (dock opening). Such a layout is typical for a harbour environment. The unsteady nature of the cross section leads to peak values in forces, sinkage and free surface deformations. Experimental tests were conducted by Flanders Hydraulics (with the co-operation of Ghent University). Numerical contributions involve three potential flow methods (Strathclyde University and Pinkster Marine Hydrodynamics) and one RANS method (Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute of Germany). All methods are capable of qualitatively predicting the water level variations and sinkage and trim of the vessel. RANS has a better capability of predicting the unsteady sway force and yaw moment acting on the ship including sinkage and trim, but it comes at a much higher computational cost.KEYWORDS: Unsteadyharbourbenchmarkhydrodynamicspotential flowRANSEFDship-bank Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":51883,"journal":{"name":"Ship Technology Research","volume":"101 20","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unsteady ship–bank interaction: a comparison between experimental and computational predictions\",\"authors\":\"G. Delefortrie, J. Verwilligen, C. Kochanowski, J. A. Pinkster, Z. M. Yuan, Y. H. Liu, M. Kastens, W. Van Hoydonck, H. J. M. Pinkster, E. Lataire\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09377255.2023.2275372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTA collaborative exercise is presented where different numerical methods were used to recreate the forces acting on a ship model while executing captive model tests along a channel which has an unsteady cross section (dock opening). Such a layout is typical for a harbour environment. The unsteady nature of the cross section leads to peak values in forces, sinkage and free surface deformations. Experimental tests were conducted by Flanders Hydraulics (with the co-operation of Ghent University). Numerical contributions involve three potential flow methods (Strathclyde University and Pinkster Marine Hydrodynamics) and one RANS method (Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute of Germany). All methods are capable of qualitatively predicting the water level variations and sinkage and trim of the vessel. RANS has a better capability of predicting the unsteady sway force and yaw moment acting on the ship including sinkage and trim, but it comes at a much higher computational cost.KEYWORDS: Unsteadyharbourbenchmarkhydrodynamicspotential flowRANSEFDship-bank Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":51883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ship Technology Research\",\"volume\":\"101 20\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ship Technology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09377255.2023.2275372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MARINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ship Technology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09377255.2023.2275372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MARINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:采用不同的数值方法来重现作用在船舶模型上的力,同时沿着具有非定常横截面(船坞开口)的通道执行自保模型测试。这样的布局是典型的海港环境。截面的非定常特性导致了力、下沉和自由表面变形的峰值。实验测试由弗兰德斯水力学公司(与根特大学合作)进行。数值贡献包括三种势流方法(Strathclyde University和Pinkster Marine Hydrodynamics)和一种RANS方法(德国联邦水道工程与研究所)。所有方法都能定性地预测水位变化和船舶的下沉和纵倾。RANS具有较好的预测船舶非定常力和偏航力矩(包括下沉和纵倾)的能力,但计算成本较高。关键词:非定常港口基准水动力学潜在流量ransefd -bank披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unsteady ship–bank interaction: a comparison between experimental and computational predictions
ABSTRACTA collaborative exercise is presented where different numerical methods were used to recreate the forces acting on a ship model while executing captive model tests along a channel which has an unsteady cross section (dock opening). Such a layout is typical for a harbour environment. The unsteady nature of the cross section leads to peak values in forces, sinkage and free surface deformations. Experimental tests were conducted by Flanders Hydraulics (with the co-operation of Ghent University). Numerical contributions involve three potential flow methods (Strathclyde University and Pinkster Marine Hydrodynamics) and one RANS method (Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute of Germany). All methods are capable of qualitatively predicting the water level variations and sinkage and trim of the vessel. RANS has a better capability of predicting the unsteady sway force and yaw moment acting on the ship including sinkage and trim, but it comes at a much higher computational cost.KEYWORDS: Unsteadyharbourbenchmarkhydrodynamicspotential flowRANSEFDship-bank Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ship Technology Research
Ship Technology Research ENGINEERING, MARINE-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Measurements of steady manoeuvring forces and moments over an axisymmetric body with appendages in a wind tunnel Practical ship afterbody optimization by multifidelity techniques Unsteady ship–bank interaction: a comparison between experimental and computational predictions A new power prediction method using ship in-service data: a case study on a general cargo ship Active flow control applied to a ship rudder model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1