政治家和民众如何将减缓气候变化的责任归责:没有迹象表明挪威存在“治理陷阱”

IF 5.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Politics Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1080/09644016.2023.2274721
Runa Falck
{"title":"政治家和民众如何将减缓气候变化的责任归责:没有迹象表明挪威存在“治理陷阱”","authors":"Runa Falck","doi":"10.1080/09644016.2023.2274721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research claims that ‘the most significant risk’ to achieving climate change mitigation goals is the ‘governance trap’, whereby governments and the public attribute responsibility for action to one another. While it is well documented that individuals call for political action on climate change, there is limited knowledge about how politicians attribute responsibility for climate change mitigation. The present study examines whether there is evidence of a ‘governance trap’ in Norway, by using two online surveys to compare how politicians (N = 1211) and the population (N = 2030) attribute responsibility for climate change mitigation to individuals, the local and regional authorities, the national authorities, the international community, and business and industry. Contrary to expectations, politicians and the population attribute responsibility to the actors in the same order. Thereby, the study contests the assumption that governments attribute primary responsibility for climate change mitigation to the population.","PeriodicalId":51393,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Politics","volume":"4 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How politicians and the population attribute responsibility for climate change mitigation: no indication of a ‘governance trap’ in Norway\",\"authors\":\"Runa Falck\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09644016.2023.2274721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous research claims that ‘the most significant risk’ to achieving climate change mitigation goals is the ‘governance trap’, whereby governments and the public attribute responsibility for action to one another. While it is well documented that individuals call for political action on climate change, there is limited knowledge about how politicians attribute responsibility for climate change mitigation. The present study examines whether there is evidence of a ‘governance trap’ in Norway, by using two online surveys to compare how politicians (N = 1211) and the population (N = 2030) attribute responsibility for climate change mitigation to individuals, the local and regional authorities, the national authorities, the international community, and business and industry. Contrary to expectations, politicians and the population attribute responsibility to the actors in the same order. Thereby, the study contests the assumption that governments attribute primary responsibility for climate change mitigation to the population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Politics\",\"volume\":\"4 9\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2023.2274721\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2023.2274721","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究声称,实现减缓气候变化目标的“最重大风险”是“治理陷阱”,即政府和公众将行动的责任相互归咎于对方。虽然个人呼吁对气候变化采取政治行动的情况有据可查,但人们对政治家如何将减缓气候变化的责任归责知之甚少。本研究通过使用两项在线调查来比较政治家(N = 1211)和民众(N = 2030)如何将减缓气候变化的责任归咎于个人、地方和地区当局、国家当局、国际社会以及工商业,从而考察挪威是否存在“治理陷阱”的证据。与预期相反,政治家和民众以同样的顺序将责任归咎于行为者。因此,该研究对政府将减缓气候变化的主要责任归于人口的假设提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How politicians and the population attribute responsibility for climate change mitigation: no indication of a ‘governance trap’ in Norway
Previous research claims that ‘the most significant risk’ to achieving climate change mitigation goals is the ‘governance trap’, whereby governments and the public attribute responsibility for action to one another. While it is well documented that individuals call for political action on climate change, there is limited knowledge about how politicians attribute responsibility for climate change mitigation. The present study examines whether there is evidence of a ‘governance trap’ in Norway, by using two online surveys to compare how politicians (N = 1211) and the population (N = 2030) attribute responsibility for climate change mitigation to individuals, the local and regional authorities, the national authorities, the international community, and business and industry. Contrary to expectations, politicians and the population attribute responsibility to the actors in the same order. Thereby, the study contests the assumption that governments attribute primary responsibility for climate change mitigation to the population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Environmental Politics is concerned with four aspects of the study of environmental politics, with a primary, though not exclusive, focus on the industrialised countries. First, it examines the evolution of environmental movements and parties. Second it provides analysis of the making and implementation of public policy in the area of the environment at international, national and local levels. Third, it carries comment on ideas generated by the various environmental movements and organisations, and by individual theorists. Fourth, it aims to cover the international environmental issues which are of increasing salience.
期刊最新文献
The economy-environment tradeoff: are individual environmental priorities decoupled from national economic conditions? On the contested compliance of CBDRRC and the erosion of trust Labour strategies in the German automotive industry: limits and potentials of conversion from a Gramscian perspective Defending the climate cause within the state: the ministry of ecology and the drafting of France’s national low-carbon strategy (2017–2020) Pulling together or pulling apart? Understanding the heterogenous collective action frames of local climate activists through a Q methodology study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1