{"title":"发展中国家33.7兆瓦太阳能光伏电站的生命周期评估","authors":"Kodami Badza, Y. M. Soro, Marie Sawadogo","doi":"10.1186/s42834-023-00201-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This work aims to determine the Energy Payback Time (EPBT) of a 33.7 MWp grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) power plant in Zagtouli (Burkina Faso) and assess its environmental impacts using the life cycle assessment tool according to ISO 14040 and 14044 standards. A “cradle to grave” approach was used, considering 1 kWh of electricity produced and injected into the national grid over 25 years as a functional unit. In addition to the baseline scenario, the other simulated scenarios combining three variables, module technology (mono c-Si, poly c-Si, and CdTe), type of mounting structure (aluminum and steel), and end-of-life treatments (landfill and recycling) were considered. SimaPro 9.4 software and the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) evaluation method were used for the calculations considering four environmental indicators. A sensitivity analysis of the change in the electricity mix was also performed. Results showed that the EPBT of the scenarios varies between 1.47 and 1.95 years, with the shortest and longest corresponding to scenarios 4 (CdTe modules, steel mounting structure, and recycling as end-of-life treatment) and scenario 3 (mono c-Si modules, aluminum mounting structure, and recycling as end-of-life treatment), respectively. All the EPBT scenarios studied can be considered acceptable given the long lifetime of PV systems (25 years). The following environmental impact results were obtained: climate change 37–48 CO 2 -eq kWh -1 , freshwater ecotoxicity 4–11 g 1,4-DCB kWh -1 , mineral resource scarcity 0.4–0.7 g Cu-eq kWh -1 and 11–13 g oil-eq kWh -1 for fossil resource scarcity. Scenario 3 (mono c-Si modules, aluminum mounting structure, and recycling as end-of-life treatment) dominates all environmental indicators studied except freshwater ecotoxicity, which is dominated by scenario 4 (CdTe modules, steel mounting structure, and recycling as end-of-life treatment). The sensitivity analysis showed that the change in the electricity mix could reduce around 30% the EPBT, climate change, and fossil resource scarcity. Considering the environmental indicators studied, using CdTe modules manufactured in a country with a less carbon-intensive electricity mix, using galvanized steel as the mounting structure, and completely recycling components at the end of their lifetime is the most environmentally friendly scenario. However, particular attention needs to be paid to the land occupation that this plant could generate.","PeriodicalId":22130,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Environment Research","volume":"2 23","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life cycle assessment of a 33.7 MW solar photovoltaic power plant in the context of a developing country\",\"authors\":\"Kodami Badza, Y. M. Soro, Marie Sawadogo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42834-023-00201-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This work aims to determine the Energy Payback Time (EPBT) of a 33.7 MWp grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) power plant in Zagtouli (Burkina Faso) and assess its environmental impacts using the life cycle assessment tool according to ISO 14040 and 14044 standards. A “cradle to grave” approach was used, considering 1 kWh of electricity produced and injected into the national grid over 25 years as a functional unit. In addition to the baseline scenario, the other simulated scenarios combining three variables, module technology (mono c-Si, poly c-Si, and CdTe), type of mounting structure (aluminum and steel), and end-of-life treatments (landfill and recycling) were considered. SimaPro 9.4 software and the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) evaluation method were used for the calculations considering four environmental indicators. A sensitivity analysis of the change in the electricity mix was also performed. Results showed that the EPBT of the scenarios varies between 1.47 and 1.95 years, with the shortest and longest corresponding to scenarios 4 (CdTe modules, steel mounting structure, and recycling as end-of-life treatment) and scenario 3 (mono c-Si modules, aluminum mounting structure, and recycling as end-of-life treatment), respectively. All the EPBT scenarios studied can be considered acceptable given the long lifetime of PV systems (25 years). The following environmental impact results were obtained: climate change 37–48 CO 2 -eq kWh -1 , freshwater ecotoxicity 4–11 g 1,4-DCB kWh -1 , mineral resource scarcity 0.4–0.7 g Cu-eq kWh -1 and 11–13 g oil-eq kWh -1 for fossil resource scarcity. Scenario 3 (mono c-Si modules, aluminum mounting structure, and recycling as end-of-life treatment) dominates all environmental indicators studied except freshwater ecotoxicity, which is dominated by scenario 4 (CdTe modules, steel mounting structure, and recycling as end-of-life treatment). The sensitivity analysis showed that the change in the electricity mix could reduce around 30% the EPBT, climate change, and fossil resource scarcity. Considering the environmental indicators studied, using CdTe modules manufactured in a country with a less carbon-intensive electricity mix, using galvanized steel as the mounting structure, and completely recycling components at the end of their lifetime is the most environmentally friendly scenario. However, particular attention needs to be paid to the land occupation that this plant could generate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Environment Research\",\"volume\":\"2 23\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Environment Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-023-00201-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Environment Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-023-00201-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在确定布基纳法索Zagtouli 33.7 MWp并网光伏(PV)电站的能源回收期(EPBT),并根据ISO 14040和14044标准使用生命周期评估工具评估其环境影响。采用了“从摇篮到坟墓”的方法,考虑到在25年内生产并注入国家电网的1千瓦时电力作为一个功能单位。除了基线场景外,还考虑了其他模拟场景,包括三个变量,模块技术(单晶硅、聚晶硅和碲化镉)、安装结构类型(铝和钢)以及寿命终止处理(垃圾填埋和回收)。采用SimaPro 9.4软件和ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H)评价方法,考虑4个环境指标进行计算。还进行了对电力结构变化的敏感性分析。结果表明:各情景的EPBT变化在1.47 ~ 1.95年之间,最短和最长分别对应于情景4 (CdTe模块、钢安装结构、报废处理)和情景3(单碳硅模块、铝安装结构、报废处理)。考虑到光伏系统的长寿命(25年),所研究的所有EPBT方案都可以被认为是可接受的。得到的环境影响结果如下:气候变化37-48 CO 2 -eq kWh -1,淡水生态毒性4-11 g 1,4- dcb kWh -1,矿产资源稀缺性0.4-0.7 g Cu-eq kWh -1,化石资源稀缺性11-13 g oil-eq kWh -1。除淡水生态毒性外,情景3(单碳硅模块,铝安装结构,回收利用作为寿命终止处理)主导了所有研究的环境指标,而情景4(碲化镉模块,钢安装结构,回收利用作为寿命终止处理)主导了淡水生态毒性。敏感性分析表明,电力结构的变化可以减少约30%的EPBT,气候变化和化石资源稀缺。考虑到所研究的环境指标,使用在碳密集型电力结构较低的国家生产的碲化镉组件,使用镀锌钢作为安装结构,并在其使用寿命结束时完全回收组件是最环保的方案。但是,需要特别注意这种植物可能造成的土地占用。
Life cycle assessment of a 33.7 MW solar photovoltaic power plant in the context of a developing country
Abstract This work aims to determine the Energy Payback Time (EPBT) of a 33.7 MWp grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) power plant in Zagtouli (Burkina Faso) and assess its environmental impacts using the life cycle assessment tool according to ISO 14040 and 14044 standards. A “cradle to grave” approach was used, considering 1 kWh of electricity produced and injected into the national grid over 25 years as a functional unit. In addition to the baseline scenario, the other simulated scenarios combining three variables, module technology (mono c-Si, poly c-Si, and CdTe), type of mounting structure (aluminum and steel), and end-of-life treatments (landfill and recycling) were considered. SimaPro 9.4 software and the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) evaluation method were used for the calculations considering four environmental indicators. A sensitivity analysis of the change in the electricity mix was also performed. Results showed that the EPBT of the scenarios varies between 1.47 and 1.95 years, with the shortest and longest corresponding to scenarios 4 (CdTe modules, steel mounting structure, and recycling as end-of-life treatment) and scenario 3 (mono c-Si modules, aluminum mounting structure, and recycling as end-of-life treatment), respectively. All the EPBT scenarios studied can be considered acceptable given the long lifetime of PV systems (25 years). The following environmental impact results were obtained: climate change 37–48 CO 2 -eq kWh -1 , freshwater ecotoxicity 4–11 g 1,4-DCB kWh -1 , mineral resource scarcity 0.4–0.7 g Cu-eq kWh -1 and 11–13 g oil-eq kWh -1 for fossil resource scarcity. Scenario 3 (mono c-Si modules, aluminum mounting structure, and recycling as end-of-life treatment) dominates all environmental indicators studied except freshwater ecotoxicity, which is dominated by scenario 4 (CdTe modules, steel mounting structure, and recycling as end-of-life treatment). The sensitivity analysis showed that the change in the electricity mix could reduce around 30% the EPBT, climate change, and fossil resource scarcity. Considering the environmental indicators studied, using CdTe modules manufactured in a country with a less carbon-intensive electricity mix, using galvanized steel as the mounting structure, and completely recycling components at the end of their lifetime is the most environmentally friendly scenario. However, particular attention needs to be paid to the land occupation that this plant could generate.
期刊介绍:
The primary goal of Sustainable Environment Research (SER) is to publish high quality research articles associated with sustainable environmental science and technology and to contribute to improving environmental practice. The scope of SER includes issues of environmental science, technology, management and related fields, especially in response to sustainable water, energy and other natural resources. Potential topics include, but are not limited to: 1. Water and Wastewater • Biological processes • Physical and chemical processes • Watershed management • Advanced and innovative treatment 2. Soil and Groundwater Pollution • Contaminant fate and transport processes • Contaminant site investigation technology • Soil and groundwater remediation technology • Risk assessment in contaminant sites 3. Air Pollution and Climate Change • Ambient air quality management • Greenhouse gases control • Gaseous and particulate pollution control • Indoor air quality management and control 4. Waste Management • Waste reduction and minimization • Recourse recovery and conservation • Solid waste treatment technology and disposal 5. Energy and Resources • Sustainable energy • Local, regional and global sustainability • Environmental management system • Life-cycle assessment • Environmental policy instruments