一步加权来概括和传递治疗效果估计到目标人群*

Ambarish Chattopadhyay, Eric R. Cohn, José R. Zubizarreta
{"title":"一步加权来概括和传递治疗效果估计到目标人群*","authors":"Ambarish Chattopadhyay, Eric R. Cohn, José R. Zubizarreta","doi":"10.1080/00031305.2023.2267598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe problems of generalization and transportation of treatment effect estimates from a study sample to a target population are central to empirical research and statistical methodology. In both randomized experiments and observational studies, weighting methods are often used with this objective. Traditional methods construct the weights by separately modeling the treatment assignment and study selection probabilities and then multiplying functions (e.g., inverses) of their estimates. In this work, we provide a justification and an implementation for weighting in a single step. We show a formal connection between this one-step method and inverse probability and inverse odds weighting. We demonstrate that the resulting estimator for the target average treatment effect is consistent, asymptotically Normal, multiply robust, and semiparametrically efficient. We evaluate the performance of the one-step estimator in a simulation study. We illustrate its use in a case study on the effects of physician racial diversity on preventive healthcare utilization among Black men in California. We provide R code implementing the methodology.Keywords: Causal inferenceGeneralizationTransportationRandomized experimentsObservational studiesWeighting methodsDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also.","PeriodicalId":342642,"journal":{"name":"The American Statistician","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-step weighting to generalize and transport treatment effect estimates to a target population*\",\"authors\":\"Ambarish Chattopadhyay, Eric R. Cohn, José R. Zubizarreta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00031305.2023.2267598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThe problems of generalization and transportation of treatment effect estimates from a study sample to a target population are central to empirical research and statistical methodology. In both randomized experiments and observational studies, weighting methods are often used with this objective. Traditional methods construct the weights by separately modeling the treatment assignment and study selection probabilities and then multiplying functions (e.g., inverses) of their estimates. In this work, we provide a justification and an implementation for weighting in a single step. We show a formal connection between this one-step method and inverse probability and inverse odds weighting. We demonstrate that the resulting estimator for the target average treatment effect is consistent, asymptotically Normal, multiply robust, and semiparametrically efficient. We evaluate the performance of the one-step estimator in a simulation study. We illustrate its use in a case study on the effects of physician racial diversity on preventive healthcare utilization among Black men in California. We provide R code implementing the methodology.Keywords: Causal inferenceGeneralizationTransportationRandomized experimentsObservational studiesWeighting methodsDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Statistician\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Statistician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2023.2267598\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Statistician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2023.2267598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要治疗效果估计从研究样本到目标人群的泛化和转移问题是实证研究和统计方法的核心问题。在随机实验和观察性研究中,权重法通常用于此目的。传统方法分别对处理分配和研究选择概率进行建模,然后将其估计值的函数(例如逆函数)相乘,从而构建权重。在这项工作中,我们提供了在单个步骤中加权的理由和实现。我们展示了这种一步法与逆概率和逆几率加权之间的正式联系。我们证明了所得到的目标平均处理效果的估计量是一致的、渐近正态的、乘鲁棒的和半参数有效的。我们在仿真研究中评估了一步估计器的性能。我们说明了它的使用,在一个案例研究的影响,医生种族多样性对预防保健利用黑人男性在加利福尼亚州。我们提供了实现该方法的R代码。关键词:因果推论,概括,运输,随机实验,观察性研究,加权方法免责声明作为对作者和研究人员的服务,我们提供这个版本的接受稿件(AM)。在最终出版版本记录(VoR)之前,将对该手稿进行编辑、排版和审查。在制作和印前,可能会发现可能影响内容的错误,所有适用于期刊的法律免责声明也与这些版本有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
One-step weighting to generalize and transport treatment effect estimates to a target population*
AbstractThe problems of generalization and transportation of treatment effect estimates from a study sample to a target population are central to empirical research and statistical methodology. In both randomized experiments and observational studies, weighting methods are often used with this objective. Traditional methods construct the weights by separately modeling the treatment assignment and study selection probabilities and then multiplying functions (e.g., inverses) of their estimates. In this work, we provide a justification and an implementation for weighting in a single step. We show a formal connection between this one-step method and inverse probability and inverse odds weighting. We demonstrate that the resulting estimator for the target average treatment effect is consistent, asymptotically Normal, multiply robust, and semiparametrically efficient. We evaluate the performance of the one-step estimator in a simulation study. We illustrate its use in a case study on the effects of physician racial diversity on preventive healthcare utilization among Black men in California. We provide R code implementing the methodology.Keywords: Causal inferenceGeneralizationTransportationRandomized experimentsObservational studiesWeighting methodsDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A review of Design of Experiments courses offered to undergraduate students at American universities On Misuses of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Test for One-Sample Goodness-of-Fit Sequential Selection for Minimizing the Variance with Application to Crystallization Experiments Sequential Selection for Minimizing the Variance with Application to Crystallization Experiments Introduction to Stochastic Finance with Market Examples, 2nd ed Introduction to Stochastic Finance with Market Examples, 2nd ed . Nicolas Privault, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, 2023, x + 652 pp., $120.00(H), ISBN 978-1-032-28826-0.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1