一种安全的经皮盲气管切开术新技术:386例回顾性病例系列研究

IF 0.5 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1186/s42077-023-00388-6
Bassem N. Beshay, Islam M. Elbardan, Moustafa A. Moustafa, Ahmed S. Shehab
{"title":"一种安全的经皮盲气管切开术新技术:386例回顾性病例系列研究","authors":"Bassem N. Beshay, Islam M. Elbardan, Moustafa A. Moustafa, Ahmed S. Shehab","doi":"10.1186/s42077-023-00388-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Griggs’ technique with assisting tools for bedside percutaneous tracheotomy (PDT) is safe and fast and carries few complications in expert hands. Assisting tools are not routinely available in many ICUs. The study aims to evaluate the impact of a novel technique for blind percutaneous tracheotomy on success rate, duration of the procedure, and rate of complications. This retrospective case-series study was conducted in the different intensive care units in Alexandria University Hospitals. Three hundred eighty-six patients were recruited from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2021. After skin incision and blunt pre-tracheal dissection, a needle was inserted to access the airway, transfixing the endotracheal tube (ETT). A change in the alignment of the needle tip inside the trachea from caudal to cranial accompanied the withdrawal of the ETT off the trachea. In situ caudal needle redirection for subsequent guidewire passage distally into the trachea was done. The rest of the procedure was continued as Griggs’ technique. Results The success rate was 100%. The procedure duration (in seconds) was 125.73±19.52. No procedure-related deaths or major intra-operative complications were encountered. Only three patients developed pneumothorax and subcutaneous emphysema, managed by intercostal tube insertion. Conclusions The novel technique for blind percutaneous tracheotomy was successful with no significant procedure-related complications. The duration of the procedure was comparable to the literature.","PeriodicalId":7686,"journal":{"name":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"5 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel technique for safe blind percutaneous tracheotomy: retrospective case-series study on three hundred eighty-six patients\",\"authors\":\"Bassem N. Beshay, Islam M. Elbardan, Moustafa A. Moustafa, Ahmed S. Shehab\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42077-023-00388-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Griggs’ technique with assisting tools for bedside percutaneous tracheotomy (PDT) is safe and fast and carries few complications in expert hands. Assisting tools are not routinely available in many ICUs. The study aims to evaluate the impact of a novel technique for blind percutaneous tracheotomy on success rate, duration of the procedure, and rate of complications. This retrospective case-series study was conducted in the different intensive care units in Alexandria University Hospitals. Three hundred eighty-six patients were recruited from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2021. After skin incision and blunt pre-tracheal dissection, a needle was inserted to access the airway, transfixing the endotracheal tube (ETT). A change in the alignment of the needle tip inside the trachea from caudal to cranial accompanied the withdrawal of the ETT off the trachea. In situ caudal needle redirection for subsequent guidewire passage distally into the trachea was done. The rest of the procedure was continued as Griggs’ technique. Results The success rate was 100%. The procedure duration (in seconds) was 125.73±19.52. No procedure-related deaths or major intra-operative complications were encountered. Only three patients developed pneumothorax and subcutaneous emphysema, managed by intercostal tube insertion. Conclusions The novel technique for blind percutaneous tracheotomy was successful with no significant procedure-related complications. The duration of the procedure was comparable to the literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-023-00388-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-023-00388-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景Griggs技术配合辅助工具行床边经皮气管切开术(PDT)安全、快速,在专家手中并发症少。辅助工具在许多icu中并不常见。本研究旨在评估盲经皮气管切开术的新技术对成功率、手术时间和并发症发生率的影响。这项回顾性病例系列研究是在亚历山大大学医院的不同重症监护室进行的。从2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日招募了386名患者。在皮肤切开和钝性气管前剥离后,插入一根针进入气道,穿刺气管内管(ETT)。气管内针尖从尾端到颅端方向的改变伴随着气管内气管内气管内气管内气管内插管的取出。原位尾端针重定向,随后导丝通过远端进入气管。接下来的手术仍沿用格里格斯的技术。结果手术成功率100%。手术时间(秒)为125.73±19.52。未发生手术相关死亡或重大术中并发症。只有3例患者发生气胸和皮下肺气肿,经肋间插管治疗。结论盲经皮气管切开术成功,无明显手术并发症。该过程的持续时间与文献相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel technique for safe blind percutaneous tracheotomy: retrospective case-series study on three hundred eighty-six patients
Abstract Background Griggs’ technique with assisting tools for bedside percutaneous tracheotomy (PDT) is safe and fast and carries few complications in expert hands. Assisting tools are not routinely available in many ICUs. The study aims to evaluate the impact of a novel technique for blind percutaneous tracheotomy on success rate, duration of the procedure, and rate of complications. This retrospective case-series study was conducted in the different intensive care units in Alexandria University Hospitals. Three hundred eighty-six patients were recruited from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2021. After skin incision and blunt pre-tracheal dissection, a needle was inserted to access the airway, transfixing the endotracheal tube (ETT). A change in the alignment of the needle tip inside the trachea from caudal to cranial accompanied the withdrawal of the ETT off the trachea. In situ caudal needle redirection for subsequent guidewire passage distally into the trachea was done. The rest of the procedure was continued as Griggs’ technique. Results The success rate was 100%. The procedure duration (in seconds) was 125.73±19.52. No procedure-related deaths or major intra-operative complications were encountered. Only three patients developed pneumothorax and subcutaneous emphysema, managed by intercostal tube insertion. Conclusions The novel technique for blind percutaneous tracheotomy was successful with no significant procedure-related complications. The duration of the procedure was comparable to the literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊最新文献
Anesthetic management of diphallia with anorectal malformation posted for colostomy: a rare association APACHE IV, SAPS III, and SOFA scores for outcome prediction in a surgical/trauma critical care unit: an analytical cross-sectional study Broken epidural catheter: individualize your management Abiraterone, a rare cause of severe perioperative hypokalemia with unusual presentation as aphonia and quadriparesis: a case report An incidental finding of xanthochromia during spinal anaesthesia in a patient posted for lower limb surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1