奥古斯塔·韦伯斯特诗歌中的幽灵自我

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 POETRY VICTORIAN POETRY Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1353/vp.2023.a907679
Andrea Selleri
{"title":"奥古斯塔·韦伯斯特诗歌中的幽灵自我","authors":"Andrea Selleri","doi":"10.1353/vp.2023.a907679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ghostly Selves in Augusta Webster’s Poetry Andrea Selleri (bio) And now it seems a jest to talk of me / as if I could be one with her.”1 Thus Eulalie, the high-end prostitute featured in Augusta Webster’s most famous poem, “A Castaway,” thinking about herself as she was as a young girl. Eulalie has stumbled on a philosophical and existential problem that emerges time and again in the history of thought and literature alike: where does the thing I call me begin and end? Over the course of a life, is there a point beyond which the continuity of the particular arrangement of molecules and memories and relations I happen to inhabit is just not enough to feel that the same person is being thought about? And what happens when such a “me-but-no-longer-really-me” barges into my consciousness again? This sort of intractable existential conundrum is an ideal hunting ground for post-Romantic poetry. As we look at our pasts, most of us feel that there is some sort of difference between the “I” that sits in the office this after noon and the “I” that was ripped screaming from a womb, or the one who threw the peppers into the canal to see if they floated. This may be due to sheer temporal distance, or to one particular traumatic event— say, taking part in a war, or suddenly finding oneself parentless, or like Eulalie becoming a “castaway”— which acts as a watershed between two near-irreducibly distinct senses of self. In hindsight, such “I’s” are so unlike the present “I” from which we picture or reminisce about their doings that the grammatical identity may feel at best like a strained convention. And yet, old selves may turn out to be not exactly dead but ghostly, materializing after their proper lifespan to puzzle, shock, or bemuse their successors. Simple reminiscence may thus take on an uncanny quality, as it does for Eulalie.2 Such re-encounters with supposedly defunct versions of ourselves are liable to produce an intimation of incongruousness, a feeling that the quiddity of experience has become at odds with the inherited grammatical or existential categories through which we describe it. The idea of the self as an unstable entity is often associated with literary modernism, and with late nineteenth-and early twentieth-century intellectual attitudes and movements such as Nietzschean anti-foundationalism and Freudian psychoanalysis. The most frequently cited operational category for this [End Page 187] destabilization is “the unconscious,” an idea that first appeared in English in 1866 courtesy of E. S. Dallas, who foregrounded it in his The Gay Science, and which became the subject of a book, Eduard von Hartmann’s Philosophie des Unbewußten, three years later.3 The earliest such developments are indeed coeval with Webster’s formative years; nonetheless, in this essay I want to suggest that another category, temporality, is more relevant to her poetic thematization of the self. A time-based problematization of selfhood had been available to philosophers since the heyday of British empiricism: David Hume’s “bundle theory,” for instance, precedes by more than a century Walter Pater’s “concurrence renewed from moment to moment,” and by nearly two Virginia Woolf ’s “luminous halo” passages, more familiar to literary scholars.4 Hume puts it quite poetically: [ People] are nothing but a bundle or collection of different perceptions, which succeed each other with an inconceivable rapidity, and are in a perpetual flux and movement. . . . The mind is a kind of theatre, where several perceptions successively make their appearance; pass, repass, glide away, and mingle in an infinite variety of postures and situations.5 If selfhood is so subject to change across time, it is perhaps more surprising that Eulalie can recognize herself from one end of her meditation to the other than that she can no longer recognize her childhood self. It was a consideration of such changeability that led a thinker from a very different philosophical tradition, F. H. Bradley, to deem the whole notion of selfhood incoherent: “[W]hen we . . . survey the man’s self from the cradle to the coffin,” he wrote, “the usual self in...","PeriodicalId":54107,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN POETRY","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ghostly Selves in Augusta Webster’s Poetry\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Selleri\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/vp.2023.a907679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ghostly Selves in Augusta Webster’s Poetry Andrea Selleri (bio) And now it seems a jest to talk of me / as if I could be one with her.”1 Thus Eulalie, the high-end prostitute featured in Augusta Webster’s most famous poem, “A Castaway,” thinking about herself as she was as a young girl. Eulalie has stumbled on a philosophical and existential problem that emerges time and again in the history of thought and literature alike: where does the thing I call me begin and end? Over the course of a life, is there a point beyond which the continuity of the particular arrangement of molecules and memories and relations I happen to inhabit is just not enough to feel that the same person is being thought about? And what happens when such a “me-but-no-longer-really-me” barges into my consciousness again? This sort of intractable existential conundrum is an ideal hunting ground for post-Romantic poetry. As we look at our pasts, most of us feel that there is some sort of difference between the “I” that sits in the office this after noon and the “I” that was ripped screaming from a womb, or the one who threw the peppers into the canal to see if they floated. This may be due to sheer temporal distance, or to one particular traumatic event— say, taking part in a war, or suddenly finding oneself parentless, or like Eulalie becoming a “castaway”— which acts as a watershed between two near-irreducibly distinct senses of self. In hindsight, such “I’s” are so unlike the present “I” from which we picture or reminisce about their doings that the grammatical identity may feel at best like a strained convention. And yet, old selves may turn out to be not exactly dead but ghostly, materializing after their proper lifespan to puzzle, shock, or bemuse their successors. Simple reminiscence may thus take on an uncanny quality, as it does for Eulalie.2 Such re-encounters with supposedly defunct versions of ourselves are liable to produce an intimation of incongruousness, a feeling that the quiddity of experience has become at odds with the inherited grammatical or existential categories through which we describe it. The idea of the self as an unstable entity is often associated with literary modernism, and with late nineteenth-and early twentieth-century intellectual attitudes and movements such as Nietzschean anti-foundationalism and Freudian psychoanalysis. The most frequently cited operational category for this [End Page 187] destabilization is “the unconscious,” an idea that first appeared in English in 1866 courtesy of E. S. Dallas, who foregrounded it in his The Gay Science, and which became the subject of a book, Eduard von Hartmann’s Philosophie des Unbewußten, three years later.3 The earliest such developments are indeed coeval with Webster’s formative years; nonetheless, in this essay I want to suggest that another category, temporality, is more relevant to her poetic thematization of the self. A time-based problematization of selfhood had been available to philosophers since the heyday of British empiricism: David Hume’s “bundle theory,” for instance, precedes by more than a century Walter Pater’s “concurrence renewed from moment to moment,” and by nearly two Virginia Woolf ’s “luminous halo” passages, more familiar to literary scholars.4 Hume puts it quite poetically: [ People] are nothing but a bundle or collection of different perceptions, which succeed each other with an inconceivable rapidity, and are in a perpetual flux and movement. . . . The mind is a kind of theatre, where several perceptions successively make their appearance; pass, repass, glide away, and mingle in an infinite variety of postures and situations.5 If selfhood is so subject to change across time, it is perhaps more surprising that Eulalie can recognize herself from one end of her meditation to the other than that she can no longer recognize her childhood self. It was a consideration of such changeability that led a thinker from a very different philosophical tradition, F. H. Bradley, to deem the whole notion of selfhood incoherent: “[W]hen we . . . survey the man’s self from the cradle to the coffin,” he wrote, “the usual self in...\",\"PeriodicalId\":54107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VICTORIAN POETRY\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VICTORIAN POETRY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/vp.2023.a907679\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VICTORIAN POETRY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vp.2023.a907679","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

奥古斯塔·韦伯斯特诗歌中的幽灵自我安德里亚·塞莱里(传记)现在谈论我似乎是个笑话/好像我能和她合而为一。因此,奥古斯塔·韦伯斯特(Augusta Webster)最著名的诗歌《一个漂流者》(A Castaway)中描写的高端妓女尤拉莉(Eulalie),在思考自己年轻时的样子。尤拉莉偶然发现了一个哲学和存在主义的问题,这个问题在思想史和文学史上一次又一次地出现:我称之为我的东西在哪里开始和结束?在人的一生中,是否存在一个点,超过这个点,我碰巧居住的分子、记忆和关系的特定排列的连续性就不足以让我觉得我在想同一个人?当这样一个“我,但不再是真正的我”再次闯入我的意识时会发生什么?这种难以解决的存在主义难题是后浪漫主义诗歌的理想狩猎场。当我们回顾自己的过去时,我们大多数人都觉得,午后坐在办公室里的“我”和从子宫里尖叫着被扯出来的“我”,或者那个把辣椒扔进运河看它们是否漂浮起来的“我”,之间存在着某种区别。这可能是由于纯粹的时间距离,或者是一个特殊的创伤事件——比如,参加了一场战争,或者突然发现自己没有父母,或者像尤拉莉一样成为一个“漂流者”——这是两种几乎不可减少的截然不同的自我意识之间的分水岭。事后看来,这样的“我”与我们现在想象或回忆他们所作所为的“我”是如此不同,以至于这种语法上的同一性至多让人觉得是一种勉强的惯例。然而,旧的自我可能并没有真正死去,而是像幽灵一样,在他们的正常寿命之后出现,让他们的继任者感到困惑、震惊或困惑。因此,简单的回忆可能会呈现出一种不可思议的特质,就像对尤拉莉所做的那样。2 .这种与被认为已经不存在的我们自己的重新相遇,容易产生一种不协调的暗示,一种感觉,即经验的必然性已经变得与我们用来描述它的继承的语法或存在范畴不一致了。自我是一个不稳定的实体,这种观点经常与文学现代主义、19世纪末和20世纪初的知识分子态度和运动联系在一起,比如尼采的反基础主义和弗洛伊德的精神分析。这种不稳定最常被引用的操作范畴是“无意识”,这个概念于1866年由E. S. Dallas首次在英语中出现,他在他的《快乐的科学》中提出了这个概念,并在三年后成为爱德华·冯·哈特曼的《unbewuu ßten的哲学》一书的主题最早的这种发展确实与韦伯斯特的形成时期是同步的;尽管如此,在这篇文章中,我想提出另一个范畴,即时间性,与她对自我的诗意主题化更为相关。自英国经验主义全盛时期以来,哲学家们就已经可以使用基于时间的自我问题化了:例如,大卫·休谟的“捆绑理论”比沃尔特·佩特的“每时每一刻更新的一致性”早了一个多世纪,而弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫的“发光的光环”段落则比文学学者更熟悉休谟很有诗意地说:[人]不过是不同知觉的一束或集合,它们以不可思议的速度相互接替,处于永恒的流动和运动中. . . .心灵是一种剧场,在那里,几种知觉相继出现;通过,再通过,滑动,并在无限的各种姿势和情况下混合如果自我如此容易随时间而改变,那么尤拉莉从冥想的一端到另一端都能认出自己,也许比她再也认不出童年的自己更令人惊讶。正是对这种可变性的考虑,导致了来自一个非常不同的哲学传统的思想家,F. H.布拉德利,认为自我的整个概念是不连贯的:“当我们……审视一个人从摇篮到棺材的自我,”他写道,“通常的自我……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ghostly Selves in Augusta Webster’s Poetry
Ghostly Selves in Augusta Webster’s Poetry Andrea Selleri (bio) And now it seems a jest to talk of me / as if I could be one with her.”1 Thus Eulalie, the high-end prostitute featured in Augusta Webster’s most famous poem, “A Castaway,” thinking about herself as she was as a young girl. Eulalie has stumbled on a philosophical and existential problem that emerges time and again in the history of thought and literature alike: where does the thing I call me begin and end? Over the course of a life, is there a point beyond which the continuity of the particular arrangement of molecules and memories and relations I happen to inhabit is just not enough to feel that the same person is being thought about? And what happens when such a “me-but-no-longer-really-me” barges into my consciousness again? This sort of intractable existential conundrum is an ideal hunting ground for post-Romantic poetry. As we look at our pasts, most of us feel that there is some sort of difference between the “I” that sits in the office this after noon and the “I” that was ripped screaming from a womb, or the one who threw the peppers into the canal to see if they floated. This may be due to sheer temporal distance, or to one particular traumatic event— say, taking part in a war, or suddenly finding oneself parentless, or like Eulalie becoming a “castaway”— which acts as a watershed between two near-irreducibly distinct senses of self. In hindsight, such “I’s” are so unlike the present “I” from which we picture or reminisce about their doings that the grammatical identity may feel at best like a strained convention. And yet, old selves may turn out to be not exactly dead but ghostly, materializing after their proper lifespan to puzzle, shock, or bemuse their successors. Simple reminiscence may thus take on an uncanny quality, as it does for Eulalie.2 Such re-encounters with supposedly defunct versions of ourselves are liable to produce an intimation of incongruousness, a feeling that the quiddity of experience has become at odds with the inherited grammatical or existential categories through which we describe it. The idea of the self as an unstable entity is often associated with literary modernism, and with late nineteenth-and early twentieth-century intellectual attitudes and movements such as Nietzschean anti-foundationalism and Freudian psychoanalysis. The most frequently cited operational category for this [End Page 187] destabilization is “the unconscious,” an idea that first appeared in English in 1866 courtesy of E. S. Dallas, who foregrounded it in his The Gay Science, and which became the subject of a book, Eduard von Hartmann’s Philosophie des Unbewußten, three years later.3 The earliest such developments are indeed coeval with Webster’s formative years; nonetheless, in this essay I want to suggest that another category, temporality, is more relevant to her poetic thematization of the self. A time-based problematization of selfhood had been available to philosophers since the heyday of British empiricism: David Hume’s “bundle theory,” for instance, precedes by more than a century Walter Pater’s “concurrence renewed from moment to moment,” and by nearly two Virginia Woolf ’s “luminous halo” passages, more familiar to literary scholars.4 Hume puts it quite poetically: [ People] are nothing but a bundle or collection of different perceptions, which succeed each other with an inconceivable rapidity, and are in a perpetual flux and movement. . . . The mind is a kind of theatre, where several perceptions successively make their appearance; pass, repass, glide away, and mingle in an infinite variety of postures and situations.5 If selfhood is so subject to change across time, it is perhaps more surprising that Eulalie can recognize herself from one end of her meditation to the other than that she can no longer recognize her childhood self. It was a consideration of such changeability that led a thinker from a very different philosophical tradition, F. H. Bradley, to deem the whole notion of selfhood incoherent: “[W]hen we . . . survey the man’s self from the cradle to the coffin,” he wrote, “the usual self in...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Founded in 1962 to further the aesthetic study of the poetry of the Victorian Period in Britain (1830–1914), Victorian Poetry publishes articles from a broad range of theoretical and critical angles, including but not confined to new historicism, feminism, and social and cultural issues. The journal has expanded its purview from the major figures of Victorian England (Tennyson, Browning, the Rossettis, etc.) to a wider compass of poets of all classes and gender identifications in nineteenth-century Britain and the Commonwealth. Victorian Poetry is edited by John B. Lamb and sponsored by the Department of English at West Virginia University.
期刊最新文献
Introduction: The Place of Victorian Poetry Keeping Faith in Victorian Poetry Reflections on Twenty Years in Victorian Poetry Victorian Women's Poetry and the Near-Death Experience of a Category Undisciplining Art Sisterhood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1