《闪烁的影像:跨电影、体现与变化美学》作者:伊丽莎·斯坦伯克(书评)

{"title":"《闪烁的影像:跨电影、体现与变化美学》作者:伊丽莎·斯坦伯克(书评)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/ff.2023.a907932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Shimmering Images: Trans Cinema, Embodiment, and the Aesthetics of Change by Eliza Steinbock Eli Anderson Shimmering Images: Trans Cinema, Embodiment, and the Aesthetics of Change by Eliza Steinbock. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2019, 234 pp., $95.52 hardcover, $25.95 paper. Shimmering Images: Trans Cinema, Embodiment, and the Aesthetics of Change by Eliza Steinbock critically engages trans film through the concept of the shimmer, broadly defined as a glimmer, a flicker, or an abrupt and flashy change. Steinbock also roots the idea of the shimmer in the theoretical work of Roland Barthes, arguing that as a device, the shimmer is both an aesthetic and explanatory tool of trans cinema. Steinbock situates their conception of trans-ness in earlier discussions by queer theorists such as Jack Halberstam, Susan Stryker, and Sandy Stone, arguing that trans ways of being \"are process-oriented, rather than object-oriented\" (12). Borrowing from Stone, they consider transgender persons as a genre rather than a strict definition and seek to embrace the ambiguities and nuances of trans experiences (14). To account for the multiplicity of trans experiences and their overlaps with the experiences of queer and intersex individuals, they use the term trans-inter-queer to describe the various embodiments and ontologies reflected in the films they investigate. In their first chapter, \"Shimmering Phantasmagoria,\" Steinbock compares trans experiences of embodiment with early phantasmagoric films, arguing that both are created through a mixture of scientific advancement and are often considered fundamentally illusory to outsiders. The phantasmagoric aesthetic, which began in proto-cinema, utilizes the shimmer as part of its trick; this parallels many mainstream conceptions of trans-ness which consider medical transition as illusory, as \"wavering on the tip of deception/astonishment\" (32). Steinbock contends that the phantasmagoric aesthetic, with its emphasis on this shimmering, provides a method for understanding and revealing other ways of being outside of the gender and sex binary, which often renders the lives of those who do not have, or in some cases even desire, a \"definite true sex\", as unliveable (34). Borrowing from Walter Benjamin's theory of \"cinema-as-surgical theatre\", Steinbock notes that the process of cutting and gluing celluloid stills mirrors the process of surgically cutting and suturing the trans-inter-queer body (35). The surgical altering of physical bodies is akin to the editing of early cinema, [End Page 257] which relies on tricking or fooling the audience via this suture. Steinbock points to the early work of filmmaker George Méliès, who used this literal cutting of celluloid to turn men into women and back again on screen; Steinbock uses this cinematic sex change to argue that this \"transsexual logic\" has been a part of the cinema \"since its inception,\" bringing new meaning to Susan Stryker's notes on the cinematic qualities of trans embodiment (36). Steinbock further contends that the literal stop-motion qualities of the camera provide a method of conceptualizing gender \"based on montage and assembly\" rather than relying on the body's supposedly natural sex (40). Continuing this point, Steinbock also points to the photo montage qualities of Lili Elbe's transition story in Man into Woman, arguing that a reading of her story in terms of trick effects reveals a story of trans embodiment of two differently sexed bodies appearing in the same person. Steinbock prioritizes this reading over a more linear story of transition, in which Elbe's male persona is killed off to make room for the female Lili. Steinbock also turns to contemporary trans \"hirstories\" which utilize similar tricks to early phantasmagoric film: Zachary Drucker and A.L. Steiner's \"BEFORE/AFTER\" (2009) and Yishay Garbasz's \"Becoming\" (2010). Both photographic projects depict the physical transition of their subjects, the former using camera tricks such as double exposure and the latter using a flipbook technique to depict the contradictory one-ness of the pre- and post-transition subject. In chapter two, \"Shimmering Sex,\" Steinbock turns to trans pornography, noting along the lines of trans scholars such as Kate Bornstein, Sandy Stone and Susan Stryker, the importance of sex and sexual pleasure to trans narratives and embodiments. Steinbock starts this chapter by borrowing the term transreal...","PeriodicalId":190295,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Formations","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shimmering Images: Trans Cinema, Embodiment, and the Aesthetics of Change by Eliza Steinbock (review)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ff.2023.a907932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: Shimmering Images: Trans Cinema, Embodiment, and the Aesthetics of Change by Eliza Steinbock Eli Anderson Shimmering Images: Trans Cinema, Embodiment, and the Aesthetics of Change by Eliza Steinbock. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2019, 234 pp., $95.52 hardcover, $25.95 paper. Shimmering Images: Trans Cinema, Embodiment, and the Aesthetics of Change by Eliza Steinbock critically engages trans film through the concept of the shimmer, broadly defined as a glimmer, a flicker, or an abrupt and flashy change. Steinbock also roots the idea of the shimmer in the theoretical work of Roland Barthes, arguing that as a device, the shimmer is both an aesthetic and explanatory tool of trans cinema. Steinbock situates their conception of trans-ness in earlier discussions by queer theorists such as Jack Halberstam, Susan Stryker, and Sandy Stone, arguing that trans ways of being \\\"are process-oriented, rather than object-oriented\\\" (12). Borrowing from Stone, they consider transgender persons as a genre rather than a strict definition and seek to embrace the ambiguities and nuances of trans experiences (14). To account for the multiplicity of trans experiences and their overlaps with the experiences of queer and intersex individuals, they use the term trans-inter-queer to describe the various embodiments and ontologies reflected in the films they investigate. In their first chapter, \\\"Shimmering Phantasmagoria,\\\" Steinbock compares trans experiences of embodiment with early phantasmagoric films, arguing that both are created through a mixture of scientific advancement and are often considered fundamentally illusory to outsiders. The phantasmagoric aesthetic, which began in proto-cinema, utilizes the shimmer as part of its trick; this parallels many mainstream conceptions of trans-ness which consider medical transition as illusory, as \\\"wavering on the tip of deception/astonishment\\\" (32). Steinbock contends that the phantasmagoric aesthetic, with its emphasis on this shimmering, provides a method for understanding and revealing other ways of being outside of the gender and sex binary, which often renders the lives of those who do not have, or in some cases even desire, a \\\"definite true sex\\\", as unliveable (34). Borrowing from Walter Benjamin's theory of \\\"cinema-as-surgical theatre\\\", Steinbock notes that the process of cutting and gluing celluloid stills mirrors the process of surgically cutting and suturing the trans-inter-queer body (35). The surgical altering of physical bodies is akin to the editing of early cinema, [End Page 257] which relies on tricking or fooling the audience via this suture. Steinbock points to the early work of filmmaker George Méliès, who used this literal cutting of celluloid to turn men into women and back again on screen; Steinbock uses this cinematic sex change to argue that this \\\"transsexual logic\\\" has been a part of the cinema \\\"since its inception,\\\" bringing new meaning to Susan Stryker's notes on the cinematic qualities of trans embodiment (36). Steinbock further contends that the literal stop-motion qualities of the camera provide a method of conceptualizing gender \\\"based on montage and assembly\\\" rather than relying on the body's supposedly natural sex (40). Continuing this point, Steinbock also points to the photo montage qualities of Lili Elbe's transition story in Man into Woman, arguing that a reading of her story in terms of trick effects reveals a story of trans embodiment of two differently sexed bodies appearing in the same person. Steinbock prioritizes this reading over a more linear story of transition, in which Elbe's male persona is killed off to make room for the female Lili. Steinbock also turns to contemporary trans \\\"hirstories\\\" which utilize similar tricks to early phantasmagoric film: Zachary Drucker and A.L. Steiner's \\\"BEFORE/AFTER\\\" (2009) and Yishay Garbasz's \\\"Becoming\\\" (2010). Both photographic projects depict the physical transition of their subjects, the former using camera tricks such as double exposure and the latter using a flipbook technique to depict the contradictory one-ness of the pre- and post-transition subject. In chapter two, \\\"Shimmering Sex,\\\" Steinbock turns to trans pornography, noting along the lines of trans scholars such as Kate Bornstein, Sandy Stone and Susan Stryker, the importance of sex and sexual pleasure to trans narratives and embodiments. Steinbock starts this chapter by borrowing the term transreal...\",\"PeriodicalId\":190295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Formations\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Formations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2023.a907932\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Formations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2023.a907932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《闪烁的图像:跨电影、体现和变化的美学》作者:伊丽莎·斯坦伯克。达勒姆,北卡罗来纳州:杜克大学出版社,2019,234页,精装本95.52美元,纸质书25.95美元。伊丽莎·斯坦伯克的《闪烁的图像:跨电影、体现和变化的美学》通过微光的概念批判性地参与了跨电影,微光被广泛定义为微光、闪烁或突然和华丽的变化。斯坦伯克还将微光的概念根植于罗兰·巴特(Roland Barthes)的理论著作中,认为微光作为一种手段,既是跨文化电影的审美工具,也是解释工具。Steinbock将他们的跨性概念置于早期酷儿理论家如Jack Halberstam, Susan Stryker和Sandy Stone的讨论中,认为跨性存在“是面向过程的,而不是面向对象的”(12)。借用斯通的观点,他们将跨性别者视为一种类型,而不是一个严格的定义,并试图接受跨性别经历的模糊性和细微差别(14)。为了解释跨性别经历的多样性及其与酷儿和双性人经历的重叠,他们使用跨性别酷儿这个术语来描述他们调查的电影中反映的各种体现和本体论。在他们的第一章“闪烁的幻影”中,斯坦伯克将跨性别的化身体验与早期的幻影电影进行了比较,认为两者都是通过科学进步的混合创造出来的,通常被外人认为是虚幻的。幻象美学始于原始电影,利用微光作为其技巧的一部分;这与许多跨性别的主流观念相似,这些观念认为医疗转变是虚幻的,是“在欺骗/惊讶的尖端摇摆不定”(32)。斯坦伯克认为,强调这种闪光的幻觉美学,为理解和揭示性别和性二元之外的其他存在方式提供了一种方法,这种方法经常使那些没有,或者在某些情况下甚至渴望“明确的真实性别”的人的生活变得无法生存(34)。借用沃尔特·本雅明(Walter Benjamin)的“电影即外科手术室”理论,Steinbock指出,切割和粘合赛璐珞剧照的过程反映了手术切割和缝合跨性别酷儿身体的过程(35)。对身体进行外科手术式的改变类似于早期电影的剪辑,[End Page 257]依靠这种缝合来欺骗或愚弄观众。斯坦伯克提到了电影制作人乔治·姆萨梅里斯(George msamli)的早期作品,他利用这种对赛璐珞的字面切割,把男人变成女人,然后再回到银幕上;斯坦伯克用这种电影中的性别变化来论证,这种“变性逻辑”“从一开始”就已经是电影的一部分,这给苏珊·斯崔克(Susan Stryker)关于变性化身的电影品质的注释带来了新的含义(36)。Steinbock进一步认为,相机的定格特性提供了一种“基于蒙太奇和集合”的概念化性别的方法,而不是依赖于身体所谓的自然性别(40)。继续这一点,Steinbock还指出了Lili Elbe在《男人变成女人》中转变故事的照片蒙太奇特质,认为从特技效果的角度解读她的故事揭示了两个不同性别的身体出现在同一个人身上的转变化身的故事。斯坦伯克优先考虑这个阅读,而不是一个更线性的过渡故事,在这个故事中,易北的男性角色被杀死,为女性莉莉腾出空间。斯坦伯克还转向了当代跨性别“历史”,这些“历史”使用了与早期幻景电影类似的技巧:扎卡里·德鲁克和A.L.斯坦纳的《之前/之后》(2009)和伊沙·加巴兹的《成为》(2010)。这两个摄影项目都描绘了其主题的物理转变,前者使用双重曝光等相机技巧,后者使用翻页技术来描绘转换前后主题的矛盾单一性。在第二章“闪烁的性”(shimmer Sex)中,斯坦伯克转向了跨性别色情作品,与凯特·伯恩斯坦(Kate bernstein)、桑迪·斯通(Sandy Stone)和苏珊·斯崔克(Susan Stryker)等跨性别学者一样,指出了性和性快感对跨性别叙事和体现的重要性。斯坦伯克在这一章的开头借用了“超现实”一词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shimmering Images: Trans Cinema, Embodiment, and the Aesthetics of Change by Eliza Steinbock (review)
Reviewed by: Shimmering Images: Trans Cinema, Embodiment, and the Aesthetics of Change by Eliza Steinbock Eli Anderson Shimmering Images: Trans Cinema, Embodiment, and the Aesthetics of Change by Eliza Steinbock. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2019, 234 pp., $95.52 hardcover, $25.95 paper. Shimmering Images: Trans Cinema, Embodiment, and the Aesthetics of Change by Eliza Steinbock critically engages trans film through the concept of the shimmer, broadly defined as a glimmer, a flicker, or an abrupt and flashy change. Steinbock also roots the idea of the shimmer in the theoretical work of Roland Barthes, arguing that as a device, the shimmer is both an aesthetic and explanatory tool of trans cinema. Steinbock situates their conception of trans-ness in earlier discussions by queer theorists such as Jack Halberstam, Susan Stryker, and Sandy Stone, arguing that trans ways of being "are process-oriented, rather than object-oriented" (12). Borrowing from Stone, they consider transgender persons as a genre rather than a strict definition and seek to embrace the ambiguities and nuances of trans experiences (14). To account for the multiplicity of trans experiences and their overlaps with the experiences of queer and intersex individuals, they use the term trans-inter-queer to describe the various embodiments and ontologies reflected in the films they investigate. In their first chapter, "Shimmering Phantasmagoria," Steinbock compares trans experiences of embodiment with early phantasmagoric films, arguing that both are created through a mixture of scientific advancement and are often considered fundamentally illusory to outsiders. The phantasmagoric aesthetic, which began in proto-cinema, utilizes the shimmer as part of its trick; this parallels many mainstream conceptions of trans-ness which consider medical transition as illusory, as "wavering on the tip of deception/astonishment" (32). Steinbock contends that the phantasmagoric aesthetic, with its emphasis on this shimmering, provides a method for understanding and revealing other ways of being outside of the gender and sex binary, which often renders the lives of those who do not have, or in some cases even desire, a "definite true sex", as unliveable (34). Borrowing from Walter Benjamin's theory of "cinema-as-surgical theatre", Steinbock notes that the process of cutting and gluing celluloid stills mirrors the process of surgically cutting and suturing the trans-inter-queer body (35). The surgical altering of physical bodies is akin to the editing of early cinema, [End Page 257] which relies on tricking or fooling the audience via this suture. Steinbock points to the early work of filmmaker George Méliès, who used this literal cutting of celluloid to turn men into women and back again on screen; Steinbock uses this cinematic sex change to argue that this "transsexual logic" has been a part of the cinema "since its inception," bringing new meaning to Susan Stryker's notes on the cinematic qualities of trans embodiment (36). Steinbock further contends that the literal stop-motion qualities of the camera provide a method of conceptualizing gender "based on montage and assembly" rather than relying on the body's supposedly natural sex (40). Continuing this point, Steinbock also points to the photo montage qualities of Lili Elbe's transition story in Man into Woman, arguing that a reading of her story in terms of trick effects reveals a story of trans embodiment of two differently sexed bodies appearing in the same person. Steinbock prioritizes this reading over a more linear story of transition, in which Elbe's male persona is killed off to make room for the female Lili. Steinbock also turns to contemporary trans "hirstories" which utilize similar tricks to early phantasmagoric film: Zachary Drucker and A.L. Steiner's "BEFORE/AFTER" (2009) and Yishay Garbasz's "Becoming" (2010). Both photographic projects depict the physical transition of their subjects, the former using camera tricks such as double exposure and the latter using a flipbook technique to depict the contradictory one-ness of the pre- and post-transition subject. In chapter two, "Shimmering Sex," Steinbock turns to trans pornography, noting along the lines of trans scholars such as Kate Bornstein, Sandy Stone and Susan Stryker, the importance of sex and sexual pleasure to trans narratives and embodiments. Steinbock starts this chapter by borrowing the term transreal...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
When Modesty Meets Aesthetic Labor: Islamic Modesty as Antithetical to Muslimah Social Media Influencers' Aesthetic Labor Editorial Introduction: Transnational Feminist Movement(s), Solidarities, and Analyses Mamá Osa in the Mountains: African Ascendientes' Embodiments of Fugitivity and Freedom in the Americas "It Came, Over and Over, Down to This: What Made Someone a Mother?": A Reproductive Justice Analysis of Little Fires Everywhere Reluctant Belonging: Tudung (Headscarf), Communalism, and Muslim Politics in Urban Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1