基于模型的番茄智能灌溉控制策略及其对水分利用效率的影响

IF 2.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Cogent Engineering Pub Date : 2023-09-18 DOI:10.1080/23311916.2023.2259217
Erion Bwambale, Felix K. Abagale, Geophrey K. Anornu
{"title":"基于模型的番茄智能灌溉控制策略及其对水分利用效率的影响","authors":"Erion Bwambale, Felix K. Abagale, Geophrey K. Anornu","doi":"10.1080/23311916.2023.2259217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drip irrigation’s potential to conserve irrigation water by around 25% compared to conventional methods is widely acknowledged. Nevertheless, the influence of varied irrigation control strategies on drip irrigation’s impact remains uncertain, particularly regarding crop growth parameters and water use efficiency. In this study, we examine the effects of three distinct irrigation control approaches manual, model-based, and open-loop on drip-irrigated tomato plants within an open field agricultural context. Employing a completely randomized design, we cultivated 160 tomato plants and administered irrigation water according to each strategy’s water requirements. Comprehensive data on key crop growth indicators, including plant height, stem diameter, leaf chlorophyll content, clusters per plant, flower and fruit counts, yield, and water use efficiency were documented. The results emphasize the pivotal role of the model-based irrigation control strategy. Specifically, this approach yielded a substantial tomato yield increase, recording 20 t/ha, in contrast to the 16 t/ha and 14 t/ha achieved by the open-loop and manual strategies, respectively. Noteworthy, the model-based approach exhibited remarkable water savings of 10.4 kg/m3, surpassing the values of 7.1 kg/m3 and 5.6 kg/m3 obtained through the open-loop and manual strategies. These differences proved statistically significant, evidenced by a p-value of 0.05. The model-based irrigation strategy led to a 29% reduction in water consumption compared to manual control. This study establishes the model-based irrigation strategy’s superiority, showcasing elevated tomato yield and improved water use efficiency. These findings furnish valuable insights into sustainable agricultural practices, particularly in the realm of drip irrigation systems.","PeriodicalId":10464,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Engineering","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model-based smart irrigation control strategy and its effect on water use efficiency in tomato production\",\"authors\":\"Erion Bwambale, Felix K. Abagale, Geophrey K. Anornu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23311916.2023.2259217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drip irrigation’s potential to conserve irrigation water by around 25% compared to conventional methods is widely acknowledged. Nevertheless, the influence of varied irrigation control strategies on drip irrigation’s impact remains uncertain, particularly regarding crop growth parameters and water use efficiency. In this study, we examine the effects of three distinct irrigation control approaches manual, model-based, and open-loop on drip-irrigated tomato plants within an open field agricultural context. Employing a completely randomized design, we cultivated 160 tomato plants and administered irrigation water according to each strategy’s water requirements. Comprehensive data on key crop growth indicators, including plant height, stem diameter, leaf chlorophyll content, clusters per plant, flower and fruit counts, yield, and water use efficiency were documented. The results emphasize the pivotal role of the model-based irrigation control strategy. Specifically, this approach yielded a substantial tomato yield increase, recording 20 t/ha, in contrast to the 16 t/ha and 14 t/ha achieved by the open-loop and manual strategies, respectively. Noteworthy, the model-based approach exhibited remarkable water savings of 10.4 kg/m3, surpassing the values of 7.1 kg/m3 and 5.6 kg/m3 obtained through the open-loop and manual strategies. These differences proved statistically significant, evidenced by a p-value of 0.05. The model-based irrigation strategy led to a 29% reduction in water consumption compared to manual control. This study establishes the model-based irrigation strategy’s superiority, showcasing elevated tomato yield and improved water use efficiency. These findings furnish valuable insights into sustainable agricultural practices, particularly in the realm of drip irrigation systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cogent Engineering\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cogent Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2259217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2259217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

与传统方法相比,滴灌可以节约约25%的灌溉用水,这一点已得到广泛认可。然而,各种灌溉控制策略对滴灌影响的影响仍然不确定,特别是在作物生长参数和水分利用效率方面。在这项研究中,我们研究了三种不同的灌溉控制方法的影响手动,基于模型和开环滴灌番茄植物在开阔的农田农业背景下。采用完全随机设计,我们种植了160株番茄植株,并根据每个策略的水需求进行灌溉。记录了作物主要生长指标的综合数据,包括株高、茎粗、叶片叶绿素含量、单株簇数、花果数、产量和水分利用效率。研究结果强调了基于模型的灌溉控制策略的关键作用。具体来说,这种方法使番茄产量大幅增加,达到20吨/公顷,而开环和人工策略分别达到16吨/公顷和14吨/公顷。值得注意的是,基于模型的方法节水效果显著,达到10.4 kg/m3,超过了开环和手动策略分别为7.1 kg/m3和5.6 kg/m3的节水效果。这些差异被证明具有统计学意义,p值为0.05。与人工控制相比,基于模型的灌溉策略使用水量减少了29%。本研究确立了基于模型的灌溉策略在提高番茄产量和提高水分利用效率方面的优势。这些发现为可持续农业实践提供了宝贵的见解,特别是在滴灌系统领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Model-based smart irrigation control strategy and its effect on water use efficiency in tomato production
Drip irrigation’s potential to conserve irrigation water by around 25% compared to conventional methods is widely acknowledged. Nevertheless, the influence of varied irrigation control strategies on drip irrigation’s impact remains uncertain, particularly regarding crop growth parameters and water use efficiency. In this study, we examine the effects of three distinct irrigation control approaches manual, model-based, and open-loop on drip-irrigated tomato plants within an open field agricultural context. Employing a completely randomized design, we cultivated 160 tomato plants and administered irrigation water according to each strategy’s water requirements. Comprehensive data on key crop growth indicators, including plant height, stem diameter, leaf chlorophyll content, clusters per plant, flower and fruit counts, yield, and water use efficiency were documented. The results emphasize the pivotal role of the model-based irrigation control strategy. Specifically, this approach yielded a substantial tomato yield increase, recording 20 t/ha, in contrast to the 16 t/ha and 14 t/ha achieved by the open-loop and manual strategies, respectively. Noteworthy, the model-based approach exhibited remarkable water savings of 10.4 kg/m3, surpassing the values of 7.1 kg/m3 and 5.6 kg/m3 obtained through the open-loop and manual strategies. These differences proved statistically significant, evidenced by a p-value of 0.05. The model-based irrigation strategy led to a 29% reduction in water consumption compared to manual control. This study establishes the model-based irrigation strategy’s superiority, showcasing elevated tomato yield and improved water use efficiency. These findings furnish valuable insights into sustainable agricultural practices, particularly in the realm of drip irrigation systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cogent Engineering
Cogent Engineering ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
213
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: One of the largest, multidisciplinary open access engineering journals of peer-reviewed research, Cogent Engineering, part of the Taylor & Francis Group, covers all areas of engineering and technology, from chemical engineering to computer science, and mechanical to materials engineering. Cogent Engineering encourages interdisciplinary research and also accepts negative results, software article, replication studies and reviews.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating road work site safety management: A case study of the Amman bus rapid transit project construction Toward optimizing scientific workflow using multi-objective optimization in a cloud environment Technology capability of Indonesian medium-sized shipyards for ship production using Product-oriented Work Breakdown Structure method (case study on shipbuilding of Mini LNG vessel) NREL Phase VI wind turbine blade tip with S809 airfoil profile winglet design and performance analysis using computational fluid dynamics Revisiting multi-domain empirical modelling of light-emitting diode luminaire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1