Encomium

IF 0.5 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1093/sq/quad008
Michael Witmore
{"title":"Encomium","authors":"Michael Witmore","doi":"10.1093/sq/quad008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gail Kern Paster has done the work of several lifetimes in service to the field of Shakespeare studies. Whether in her groundbreaking scholarship on humoral theory, her leadership of the Folger Shakespeare Library, or her editorial roles at Shakespeare Quarterly, Gail’s unique ability to bring passion, leadership, and insight to her work have been an inspiration to her colleagues. I know this firsthand as her successor as Folger Director. Gail led the Folger through a period of change, challenge, and innovation—including a period of seismic shifts in the intellectual landscape as the generalizations of “high theory” were forced into conversation with the “archive.” Shakespeare Quarterly helped lead the conversation about how methodologies from many fields could be in dialogue with our teaching and scholarship around this writer and the early modern period. As the aperture widens ever more in terms of the disciplines we engage, and the history and uses of Shakespeare scholarship come into clearer focus, I am grateful for the intellectual intensity and focus that Gail has brought to the journal—an intensity that we know sits comfortably with her warmth as a colleague and human being. In its role as lead journal for one of the most widely read and performed writers in the world, Shakespeare Quarterly has found and advanced the most searching discussions about this writer and the humanities more generally. Some of the intensity of that conversation is a result of Shakespeare’s myriad identities—as an institution, a canonical writer, a bankable theatrical storyteller, and a pivot-point in historical formations such as colonialism. And our ability to think about Shakespeare in these ways is itself a legacy of the journal and the care that has guided and sustained its work.","PeriodicalId":39634,"journal":{"name":"SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Encomium\",\"authors\":\"Michael Witmore\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sq/quad008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gail Kern Paster has done the work of several lifetimes in service to the field of Shakespeare studies. Whether in her groundbreaking scholarship on humoral theory, her leadership of the Folger Shakespeare Library, or her editorial roles at Shakespeare Quarterly, Gail’s unique ability to bring passion, leadership, and insight to her work have been an inspiration to her colleagues. I know this firsthand as her successor as Folger Director. Gail led the Folger through a period of change, challenge, and innovation—including a period of seismic shifts in the intellectual landscape as the generalizations of “high theory” were forced into conversation with the “archive.” Shakespeare Quarterly helped lead the conversation about how methodologies from many fields could be in dialogue with our teaching and scholarship around this writer and the early modern period. As the aperture widens ever more in terms of the disciplines we engage, and the history and uses of Shakespeare scholarship come into clearer focus, I am grateful for the intellectual intensity and focus that Gail has brought to the journal—an intensity that we know sits comfortably with her warmth as a colleague and human being. In its role as lead journal for one of the most widely read and performed writers in the world, Shakespeare Quarterly has found and advanced the most searching discussions about this writer and the humanities more generally. Some of the intensity of that conversation is a result of Shakespeare’s myriad identities—as an institution, a canonical writer, a bankable theatrical storyteller, and a pivot-point in historical formations such as colonialism. And our ability to think about Shakespeare in these ways is itself a legacy of the journal and the care that has guided and sustained its work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sq/quad008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sq/quad008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

盖尔·科恩·帕斯特在莎士比亚研究领域做了几辈子的工作。无论是她在体液理论方面的开创性奖学金,她在福尔杰莎士比亚图书馆的领导地位,还是她在莎士比亚季刊的编辑角色,盖尔在工作中带来激情,领导能力和洞察力的独特能力一直鼓舞着她的同事。作为她的继任者,我深知这一点。盖尔带领Folger经历了一段变革、挑战和创新的时期——包括一段智力景观发生翻天覆地变化的时期,因为“高级理论”的概括被迫与“档案”进行对话。《莎士比亚季刊》帮助引导了一场对话,讨论了来自许多领域的方法论如何与我们围绕这位作家和早期现代时期的教学和学术进行对话。随着我们参与的学科范围越来越广,莎士比亚学术研究的历史和用途变得更加清晰,我很感激盖尔为这本杂志带来的智力强度和关注——我们知道,这种强度与她作为同事和人类的温暖相适应。作为世界上最广泛阅读和表演的作家之一的主要期刊,《莎士比亚季刊》发现并推进了关于这位作家和更广泛的人文学科的最深入的讨论。这场对话的激烈程度部分源于莎士比亚的多重身份——作为一个机构、一个权威作家、一个卖座的戏剧故事讲述者,以及殖民主义等历史形态的转折点。我们以这些方式思考莎士比亚的能力本身就是该杂志的遗产,也是指导和维持其工作的关怀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Encomium
Gail Kern Paster has done the work of several lifetimes in service to the field of Shakespeare studies. Whether in her groundbreaking scholarship on humoral theory, her leadership of the Folger Shakespeare Library, or her editorial roles at Shakespeare Quarterly, Gail’s unique ability to bring passion, leadership, and insight to her work have been an inspiration to her colleagues. I know this firsthand as her successor as Folger Director. Gail led the Folger through a period of change, challenge, and innovation—including a period of seismic shifts in the intellectual landscape as the generalizations of “high theory” were forced into conversation with the “archive.” Shakespeare Quarterly helped lead the conversation about how methodologies from many fields could be in dialogue with our teaching and scholarship around this writer and the early modern period. As the aperture widens ever more in terms of the disciplines we engage, and the history and uses of Shakespeare scholarship come into clearer focus, I am grateful for the intellectual intensity and focus that Gail has brought to the journal—an intensity that we know sits comfortably with her warmth as a colleague and human being. In its role as lead journal for one of the most widely read and performed writers in the world, Shakespeare Quarterly has found and advanced the most searching discussions about this writer and the humanities more generally. Some of the intensity of that conversation is a result of Shakespeare’s myriad identities—as an institution, a canonical writer, a bankable theatrical storyteller, and a pivot-point in historical formations such as colonialism. And our ability to think about Shakespeare in these ways is itself a legacy of the journal and the care that has guided and sustained its work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY
SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Founded in 1950 by the Shakespeare Association of America, Shakespeare Quarterly is a refereed journal committed to publishing articles in the vanguard of Shakespeare studies. The Quarterly, produced by Folger Shakespeare Library in association with George Washington University, features notes that bring to light new information on Shakespeare and his age, issue and exchange sections for the latest ideas and controversies, theater reviews of significant Shakespeare productions, and book reviews to keep its readers current with Shakespeare criticism and scholarship.
期刊最新文献
Introduction: The Patchwork Folio The Anachronic Shakespeare 1623 Folio The 1623 Folio and Collection(s): Beyond Shakespeare “Baggage Bookes” and the Shakespeare First Folio: Towards a Critical Historiography of the Book The First Folio in the Web of Readers and Collectors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1