用振动台试验研究土袋垫的动力性能

IF 2.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Geosynthetics International Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1680/jgein.23.00074
B. Fang, S. Liu, Y. Lu, S. Chen, Y. Zhang, C. Zhang, C. Zhang
{"title":"用振动台试验研究土袋垫的动力性能","authors":"B. Fang, S. Liu, Y. Lu, S. Chen, Y. Zhang, C. Zhang, C. Zhang","doi":"10.1680/jgein.23.00074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soilbag cushion is one of the promising base isolation methods to reduce seismic energy transfer from ground to building structure. In this study, a series of shaking table tests were conducted comparatively on foundation models with soilbag cushion and sand cushion to evaluate their dynamic performance. The test results indicate that soilbag cushion could significantly reduce acceleration response and accumulated settlement compared to sand cushion. And the relatively smaller amplitude of dynamic lateral earth pressure measured on contact surface of soilbags within soilbag cushion also indicates its stability during oscillation. The advantages of soilbag cushion for energy dissipation and damping are more easily highlighted under the condition of high-acceleration, high-frequency or high uniformly distributed load. The dynamic performance of soilbag cushion is dependent on embedded depth and thickness. It is most effective for soilbag cushion to be arranged near the rigid footing of building structures; it is suggested that the number of layers of soilbag cushion be controlled on the premise of the designed ratio of the thickness to the width of soilbag cushion ranging from 0.125 to 0.4 for low- or middle-rise masonry buildings in practical engineering.","PeriodicalId":12616,"journal":{"name":"Geosynthetics International","volume":" 49","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation on dynamic performance of soilbag cushion using shaking table tests\",\"authors\":\"B. Fang, S. Liu, Y. Lu, S. Chen, Y. Zhang, C. Zhang, C. Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jgein.23.00074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soilbag cushion is one of the promising base isolation methods to reduce seismic energy transfer from ground to building structure. In this study, a series of shaking table tests were conducted comparatively on foundation models with soilbag cushion and sand cushion to evaluate their dynamic performance. The test results indicate that soilbag cushion could significantly reduce acceleration response and accumulated settlement compared to sand cushion. And the relatively smaller amplitude of dynamic lateral earth pressure measured on contact surface of soilbags within soilbag cushion also indicates its stability during oscillation. The advantages of soilbag cushion for energy dissipation and damping are more easily highlighted under the condition of high-acceleration, high-frequency or high uniformly distributed load. The dynamic performance of soilbag cushion is dependent on embedded depth and thickness. It is most effective for soilbag cushion to be arranged near the rigid footing of building structures; it is suggested that the number of layers of soilbag cushion be controlled on the premise of the designed ratio of the thickness to the width of soilbag cushion ranging from 0.125 to 0.4 for low- or middle-rise masonry buildings in practical engineering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geosynthetics International\",\"volume\":\" 49\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geosynthetics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.23.00074\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosynthetics International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.23.00074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土袋垫层是一种很有前途的基础隔震方法,可以减少地震能量从地面传递到建筑结构。本研究对土袋垫层和砂垫层地基模型进行了振动台对比试验,对其动力性能进行了评价。试验结果表明,与砂垫层相比,土袋垫层能显著降低土体的加速度响应和累积沉降。在土袋垫层内部土袋接触面测得的动侧土压力幅值相对较小,也说明了土袋垫层在振荡过程中的稳定性。在高加速度、高频或高均布荷载条件下,土袋垫的耗能和阻尼优势更容易凸显。土袋垫层的动力性能与埋置深度和厚度有关。土袋垫层布置在建筑结构刚性基础附近最有效;建议在实际工程中,对于中低层砌体建筑,在土袋垫层厚度与宽度的设计比为0.125 ~ 0.4的前提下,控制土袋垫层的层数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation on dynamic performance of soilbag cushion using shaking table tests
Soilbag cushion is one of the promising base isolation methods to reduce seismic energy transfer from ground to building structure. In this study, a series of shaking table tests were conducted comparatively on foundation models with soilbag cushion and sand cushion to evaluate their dynamic performance. The test results indicate that soilbag cushion could significantly reduce acceleration response and accumulated settlement compared to sand cushion. And the relatively smaller amplitude of dynamic lateral earth pressure measured on contact surface of soilbags within soilbag cushion also indicates its stability during oscillation. The advantages of soilbag cushion for energy dissipation and damping are more easily highlighted under the condition of high-acceleration, high-frequency or high uniformly distributed load. The dynamic performance of soilbag cushion is dependent on embedded depth and thickness. It is most effective for soilbag cushion to be arranged near the rigid footing of building structures; it is suggested that the number of layers of soilbag cushion be controlled on the premise of the designed ratio of the thickness to the width of soilbag cushion ranging from 0.125 to 0.4 for low- or middle-rise masonry buildings in practical engineering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geosynthetics International
Geosynthetics International ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: An online only, rapid publication journal, Geosynthetics International – an official journal of the International Geosynthetics Society (IGS) – publishes the best information on current geosynthetics technology in research, design innovation, new materials and construction practice. Topics covered The whole of geosynthetic materials (including natural fibre products) such as research, behaviour, performance analysis, testing, design, construction methods, case histories and field experience. Geosynthetics International is received by all members of the IGS as part of their membership, and is published in e-only format six times a year.
期刊最新文献
Na-CMC-amended clay: effect of mixing method on hydraulic conductivity and polymer elution A nonlinear analytical model for consolidated geotextile-encased sand columns Geotextile filters: from idealization to real behaviour (Giroud Lecture 2023) Mechanical characteristics of geogrids produced from recycled polyester Natural weathering effects of nonwoven geotextile exposed to different climate conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1