2020年卖空禁令的市场影响

IF 1.5 3区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Financial Research Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1111/jfir.12355
Alessandro Spolaore, Caroline Le Moign
{"title":"2020年卖空禁令的市场影响","authors":"Alessandro Spolaore, Caroline Le Moign","doi":"10.1111/jfir.12355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the height of the COVID‐19 related market stress in March 2020, six European countries implemented market‐wide short selling bans. Based on a difference‐in‐difference approach using regulatory data, our estimation finds that the bans are associated with a deterioration in liquidity and trading volumes, and a decrease in volatility, without evidence of price impact. Remarkably, the negative impact persisted after the bans’ lift. Liquidity deterioration appears stronger for liquid shares‐ large‐cap, highly fragmented stocks, and stocks with listed derivatives. Sectoral effects are noticed for the stocks most affected by the market stress. Finally, no displacement effect was observed.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":47584,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Market impacts of the 2020 short selling bans\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Spolaore, Caroline Le Moign\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfir.12355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the height of the COVID‐19 related market stress in March 2020, six European countries implemented market‐wide short selling bans. Based on a difference‐in‐difference approach using regulatory data, our estimation finds that the bans are associated with a deterioration in liquidity and trading volumes, and a decrease in volatility, without evidence of price impact. Remarkably, the negative impact persisted after the bans’ lift. Liquidity deterioration appears stronger for liquid shares‐ large‐cap, highly fragmented stocks, and stocks with listed derivatives. Sectoral effects are noticed for the stocks most affected by the market stress. Finally, no displacement effect was observed.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Financial Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Financial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.12355\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.12355","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2020年3月与COVID - 19相关的市场压力达到顶峰时,六个欧洲国家实施了全市场的卖空禁令。基于使用监管数据的差中差方法,我们的估计发现,禁令与流动性和交易量的恶化以及波动性的下降有关,没有证据表明价格受到影响。值得注意的是,禁令解除后,负面影响依然存在。流动性恶化在流动性股票——大市值、高度分散的股票和上市衍生品股票中表现得更为明显。受市场压力影响最大的股票受到了行业效应的影响。最后,没有观察到位移效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Market impacts of the 2020 short selling bans
At the height of the COVID‐19 related market stress in March 2020, six European countries implemented market‐wide short selling bans. Based on a difference‐in‐difference approach using regulatory data, our estimation finds that the bans are associated with a deterioration in liquidity and trading volumes, and a decrease in volatility, without evidence of price impact. Remarkably, the negative impact persisted after the bans’ lift. Liquidity deterioration appears stronger for liquid shares‐ large‐cap, highly fragmented stocks, and stocks with listed derivatives. Sectoral effects are noticed for the stocks most affected by the market stress. Finally, no displacement effect was observed.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Research
Journal of Financial Research BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Research(JFR) is a quarterly academic journal sponsored by the Southern Finance Association (SFA) and the Southwestern Finance Association (SWFA). It has been continuously published since 1978 and focuses on the publication of original scholarly research in various areas of finance such as investment and portfolio management, capital markets and institutions, corporate finance, corporate governance, and capital investment. The JFR, also known as the Journal of Financial Research, provides a platform for researchers to contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of finance.
期刊最新文献
Local labor match and corporate investments: Evidence from new flight routes Estimating background risk hedging demands from cross‐sectional data Issue Information ‘And forgive us our debts’: Christian moralities and over‐indebtedness Sink or swim? Managerial ability and trade credit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1