共情准确性、正念与面部情绪识别:一项实验研究

Marije aan het Rot, Merle-Marie Pittelkow, D. Elisabeth Eckhardt, Nils Simonsen, Brian D. Ostafin
{"title":"共情准确性、正念与面部情绪识别:一项实验研究","authors":"Marije aan het Rot, Merle-Marie Pittelkow, D. Elisabeth Eckhardt, Nils Simonsen, Brian D. Ostafin","doi":"10.36850/e17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Empathic accuracy, i.e., the degree to which one is able to accurately infer the emotions of others, may be acutely malleable. We examined this idea by testing the immediate effect of a brief mindfulness intervention or facial emotion recognition training. Methods: Participants were English- or Dutch-speaking psychology students who were assigned to one of three brief intervention conditions (all instructions given in English): (1) verbal instructions for practicing awareness of their body (mindfulness, n = 23); (2) verbal and visual instructions regarding the detection of visual cues for anger, fear, sadness, and happiness (facial emotion recognition training, n = 23); or (3) a verbal, neutral didactic lecture on mindfulness (control, n = 23). Subsequently, participants completed a Dutch-language empathic accuracy task. Results: There was no significant overall difference in empathic accuracy between the three participant subgroups, suggesting no effect of the two target interventions. Nonetheless, even though empathic accuracy appeared unaltered by facial emotion recognition training among participants who understood Dutch well, it was better after this intervention than after the control intervention among participants with a relatively limited understanding of Dutch. Limitations: The study used a small convenience sample. The control condition was listening to a lecture on mindfulness. Empathic accuracy was not assessed at baseline. Moreover, we did not formally assess language understanding, as we did not predict its presumed impact a priori. Conclusions: A better study design is needed to find out whether facial emotion recognition training can help improve empathic accuracy when the understanding of verbal cues is limited.","PeriodicalId":471449,"journal":{"name":"Journal of trial and error","volume":" 18","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empathic Accuracy, Mindfulness, and Facial Emotion Recognition: An Experimental Study\",\"authors\":\"Marije aan het Rot, Merle-Marie Pittelkow, D. Elisabeth Eckhardt, Nils Simonsen, Brian D. Ostafin\",\"doi\":\"10.36850/e17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objectives: Empathic accuracy, i.e., the degree to which one is able to accurately infer the emotions of others, may be acutely malleable. We examined this idea by testing the immediate effect of a brief mindfulness intervention or facial emotion recognition training. Methods: Participants were English- or Dutch-speaking psychology students who were assigned to one of three brief intervention conditions (all instructions given in English): (1) verbal instructions for practicing awareness of their body (mindfulness, n = 23); (2) verbal and visual instructions regarding the detection of visual cues for anger, fear, sadness, and happiness (facial emotion recognition training, n = 23); or (3) a verbal, neutral didactic lecture on mindfulness (control, n = 23). Subsequently, participants completed a Dutch-language empathic accuracy task. Results: There was no significant overall difference in empathic accuracy between the three participant subgroups, suggesting no effect of the two target interventions. Nonetheless, even though empathic accuracy appeared unaltered by facial emotion recognition training among participants who understood Dutch well, it was better after this intervention than after the control intervention among participants with a relatively limited understanding of Dutch. Limitations: The study used a small convenience sample. The control condition was listening to a lecture on mindfulness. Empathic accuracy was not assessed at baseline. Moreover, we did not formally assess language understanding, as we did not predict its presumed impact a priori. Conclusions: A better study design is needed to find out whether facial emotion recognition training can help improve empathic accuracy when the understanding of verbal cues is limited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":471449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of trial and error\",\"volume\":\" 18\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of trial and error\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36850/e17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of trial and error","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36850/e17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:移情准确性,即一个人能够准确推断他人情绪的程度,可能是非常可塑的。我们通过测试短暂的正念干预或面部情绪识别训练的直接效果来检验这一观点。方法:参与者是说英语或荷兰语的心理学学生,他们被分配到三个简短的干预条件之一(所有指示都用英语给出):(1)口头指导练习他们的身体意识(正念,n = 23);(2)关于检测愤怒、恐惧、悲伤和快乐的视觉线索的语言和视觉指导(面部情绪识别训练,n = 23);或者(3)一个关于正念的口头、中立的说教讲座(对照,n = 23)。随后,参与者完成了一项荷兰语移情准确性任务。结果:三个被试亚组的共情准确性总体上没有显著差异,表明两种目标干预措施没有影响。然而,即使面部情绪识别训练对理解荷兰语的参与者的移情准确性没有影响,但在这种干预后,对荷兰语理解相对有限的参与者的移情准确性优于对照干预。局限性:本研究使用了一个小样本。对照条件是听一个关于正念的讲座。在基线时不评估共情准确性。此外,我们没有正式评估语言理解能力,因为我们没有预测其假定的先验影响。结论:当言语线索理解有限时,面部情绪识别训练是否有助于提高移情准确性,需要更好的研究设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empathic Accuracy, Mindfulness, and Facial Emotion Recognition: An Experimental Study
Background and Objectives: Empathic accuracy, i.e., the degree to which one is able to accurately infer the emotions of others, may be acutely malleable. We examined this idea by testing the immediate effect of a brief mindfulness intervention or facial emotion recognition training. Methods: Participants were English- or Dutch-speaking psychology students who were assigned to one of three brief intervention conditions (all instructions given in English): (1) verbal instructions for practicing awareness of their body (mindfulness, n = 23); (2) verbal and visual instructions regarding the detection of visual cues for anger, fear, sadness, and happiness (facial emotion recognition training, n = 23); or (3) a verbal, neutral didactic lecture on mindfulness (control, n = 23). Subsequently, participants completed a Dutch-language empathic accuracy task. Results: There was no significant overall difference in empathic accuracy between the three participant subgroups, suggesting no effect of the two target interventions. Nonetheless, even though empathic accuracy appeared unaltered by facial emotion recognition training among participants who understood Dutch well, it was better after this intervention than after the control intervention among participants with a relatively limited understanding of Dutch. Limitations: The study used a small convenience sample. The control condition was listening to a lecture on mindfulness. Empathic accuracy was not assessed at baseline. Moreover, we did not formally assess language understanding, as we did not predict its presumed impact a priori. Conclusions: A better study design is needed to find out whether facial emotion recognition training can help improve empathic accuracy when the understanding of verbal cues is limited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smile, You’re on Camera: Investigating the Relationship between Selfie Smiles and Distress Reflections on the Unintended Consequences of the Science Reform Movement Issues in Clinical Studies Leading to Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) Negative Decisions Reputation Without Practice? A Dynamic Computational Model of the Unintended Consequences of Open Scientist Reputations "Not again": When the Therapist Resists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1