缺血性脑卒中恢复期微栓塞信号的分类方法

Ekaterina V. Orlova, Alexandr B. Berdalin, Vladimir G. Lelyuk
{"title":"缺血性脑卒中恢复期微栓塞信号的分类方法","authors":"Ekaterina V. Orlova, Alexandr B. Berdalin, Vladimir G. Lelyuk","doi":"10.54101/acen.2023.3.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Microembolus detection by transcranial Doppler (TCD) is the only non-invasive modality for visualization of cerebral embolism. Currently, there is no unified classification of recorded microembolic signals (MES) that could be used in clinical practice.
 The aim of the study is to investigate biophysical MES parameters in patients with ischemic stroke, as well as to assess approaches to microemboli differentiation by structure and origin to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the method and to reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic events.
 Materials and methods. The inclusion criterion was TCD-detected signs of MES. We analyzed the data of 28 patients with ischemic stroke (9 women and 19 men; mean age was 58 years 13). We recorded power, duration, and frequency for each MES, and calculated an energy index.
 Results. A total of 938 MES were reported. In patients with cardioembolic stroke and all other pathogenetic stroke subtypes, biophysical parameter limits were as follows: 14.65 dB for the average power, 9.45 ms for the average duration, and 0.16 J for the average energy index. For patients with atrial fibrillation, characteristic MES power was found to be 13 dB. The MES frequency limit was determined to be 650 Hz for microemboli differentiation by acoustic density.
 Conclusion. The data obtained can be used to further search for optimal limit ranges for biophysical parameters of various MES in order to establish a single MES classification, which will increase the diagnostic value of microembolus detection by TCD in stroke treatment practice.","PeriodicalId":36946,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to classification of microembolic signals in patients recovering from ischemic stroke\",\"authors\":\"Ekaterina V. Orlova, Alexandr B. Berdalin, Vladimir G. Lelyuk\",\"doi\":\"10.54101/acen.2023.3.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Microembolus detection by transcranial Doppler (TCD) is the only non-invasive modality for visualization of cerebral embolism. Currently, there is no unified classification of recorded microembolic signals (MES) that could be used in clinical practice.
 The aim of the study is to investigate biophysical MES parameters in patients with ischemic stroke, as well as to assess approaches to microemboli differentiation by structure and origin to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the method and to reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic events.
 Materials and methods. The inclusion criterion was TCD-detected signs of MES. We analyzed the data of 28 patients with ischemic stroke (9 women and 19 men; mean age was 58 years 13). We recorded power, duration, and frequency for each MES, and calculated an energy index.
 Results. A total of 938 MES were reported. In patients with cardioembolic stroke and all other pathogenetic stroke subtypes, biophysical parameter limits were as follows: 14.65 dB for the average power, 9.45 ms for the average duration, and 0.16 J for the average energy index. For patients with atrial fibrillation, characteristic MES power was found to be 13 dB. The MES frequency limit was determined to be 650 Hz for microemboli differentiation by acoustic density.
 Conclusion. The data obtained can be used to further search for optimal limit ranges for biophysical parameters of various MES in order to establish a single MES classification, which will increase the diagnostic value of microembolus detection by TCD in stroke treatment practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54101/acen.2023.3.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54101/acen.2023.3.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。经颅多普勒(TCD)检测微栓子是脑栓塞可视化的唯一非侵入性方法。目前,对记录的微栓塞信号(MES)没有统一的分类,无法用于临床实践。 本研究的目的是研究缺血性卒中患者的生物物理MES参数,并通过结构和来源评估微栓子分化的方法,以提高该方法的诊断准确性,降低复发性缺血性事件的风险。 材料和方法。纳入标准为tcd检测到的MES体征。我们分析了28例缺血性脑卒中患者的资料(女性9例,男性19例;平均年龄58岁(13)。我们记录了每个MES的功率、持续时间和频率,并计算了能量指数。 结果。报告了938例MES。在心源性卒中和所有其他致病性卒中亚型患者中,生物物理参数极限如下:平均功率14.65 dB,平均持续时间9.45 ms,平均能量指数0.16 J。心房颤动患者的特征性MES功率为13 dB。声学密度测定微栓子分化的MES频率上限为650 Hz。 结论。所得数据可用于进一步寻找各种MES生物物理参数的最佳极限值,建立单一MES分类,提高TCD检测微栓子在脑卒中治疗实践中的诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Approaches to classification of microembolic signals in patients recovering from ischemic stroke
Introduction. Microembolus detection by transcranial Doppler (TCD) is the only non-invasive modality for visualization of cerebral embolism. Currently, there is no unified classification of recorded microembolic signals (MES) that could be used in clinical practice. The aim of the study is to investigate biophysical MES parameters in patients with ischemic stroke, as well as to assess approaches to microemboli differentiation by structure and origin to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the method and to reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic events. Materials and methods. The inclusion criterion was TCD-detected signs of MES. We analyzed the data of 28 patients with ischemic stroke (9 women and 19 men; mean age was 58 years 13). We recorded power, duration, and frequency for each MES, and calculated an energy index. Results. A total of 938 MES were reported. In patients with cardioembolic stroke and all other pathogenetic stroke subtypes, biophysical parameter limits were as follows: 14.65 dB for the average power, 9.45 ms for the average duration, and 0.16 J for the average energy index. For patients with atrial fibrillation, characteristic MES power was found to be 13 dB. The MES frequency limit was determined to be 650 Hz for microemboli differentiation by acoustic density. Conclusion. The data obtained can be used to further search for optimal limit ranges for biophysical parameters of various MES in order to establish a single MES classification, which will increase the diagnostic value of microembolus detection by TCD in stroke treatment practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Phenotypes of COVID-19-associated dysautonomia in patients requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Optimization of laboratory diagnostics of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: indications and algorithms Postoperative hemorrhages in vestibular schwannoma surgery pontine hemorrhage. Clinical case report Immunomorphologic assessment of changes in functional astroglial proteins in a kainate-induced hippocampal sclerosis model Simultaneous dual-target magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound treatment for patients with tremor-dominant Parkinson’s disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1