从欧洲共同体到欧盟。准备好了吗?

Mark Gilbert
{"title":"从欧洲共同体到欧盟。准备好了吗?","authors":"Mark Gilbert","doi":"10.51663/pnz.63.2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that the cases of Italy and the UK suggest that European integration is a contested process and certainly not one that inevitably brings good results. It requires complex national realities to adapt themselves to norms decided collectively at elite level. In hindsight (but not only in hindsight), the UK’s political culture, and Italy’s political-institutional system, were radically unprepared for the shock of accelerating integration in the 1990s and 2000s.","PeriodicalId":38904,"journal":{"name":"Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the EC to the EU. Ready or Not\",\"authors\":\"Mark Gilbert\",\"doi\":\"10.51663/pnz.63.2.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article argues that the cases of Italy and the UK suggest that European integration is a contested process and certainly not one that inevitably brings good results. It requires complex national realities to adapt themselves to norms decided collectively at elite level. In hindsight (but not only in hindsight), the UK’s political culture, and Italy’s political-institutional system, were radically unprepared for the shock of accelerating integration in the 1990s and 2000s.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51663/pnz.63.2.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino / Inštitut za zgodovino delavskega gibanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51663/pnz.63.2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,意大利和英国的案例表明,欧洲一体化是一个有争议的过程,肯定不会带来好结果。这需要复杂的国家现实来适应精英阶层集体决定的规范。事后看来(但不仅是事后看来),英国的政治文化和意大利的政治制度体系根本没有准备好应对上世纪90年代和本世纪头十年加速一体化带来的冲击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From the EC to the EU. Ready or Not
This article argues that the cases of Italy and the UK suggest that European integration is a contested process and certainly not one that inevitably brings good results. It requires complex national realities to adapt themselves to norms decided collectively at elite level. In hindsight (but not only in hindsight), the UK’s political culture, and Italy’s political-institutional system, were radically unprepared for the shock of accelerating integration in the 1990s and 2000s.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Enakost v različnem: dejstva in spoznanja o politični problematiki dveh jugoslovanskih držav The hour of European truth for Slovenian intellectuals »Bivša Avstrija ni imela nobenega smisla, da bi v dolgih stoletjih svoje vlade vodo zravnavala, /…/ ker je bila zaposlena povsod drugod, le pri nas po možnosti malo.« Šole govorijo European Politics Behind Closed Doors: The Origins of Euroscepticism in Slovenia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1