采收季节对刺荨麻提取物多酚成分及抑菌活性的影响

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Acta Alimentaria Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1556/066.2023.00156
K. Kőszegi, Gy. Végvári, É. Stefanovits-Bányai, E. Békássy-Molnár, A. Maráz
{"title":"采收季节对刺荨麻提取物多酚成分及抑菌活性的影响","authors":"K. Kőszegi, Gy. Végvári, É. Stefanovits-Bányai, E. Békássy-Molnár, A. Maráz","doi":"10.1556/066.2023.00156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of our research was to study the water and ethanol extractable polyphenols of stinging nettle ( Urtica dioica L.) harvested in different seasons and to determine their antimicrobial activity against certain human pathogenic and food spoiling bacteria and yeasts. Our results indicate that the spring leaf extracts had higher polyphenol contents than the root one; however, close to the end of the vegetation period these values decreased considerably in both leaves and roots. Detection and quantification of the most abundant phenolic compounds in the spring extracts by HPLC revealed the occurrence of 12 different phenol carboxylic acids and flavonoids. Flavonoid compounds were more abundant than phenol carboxylic acids in the leaves; however, their proportion was equal in the case of the roots. Nettle leaf extracts had remarkable antimicrobial activity, the spring extracts were more efficient than the autumn ones. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were sensitive to every leaf extract, while Listeria monocytogenes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa had reduced but remarkable sensitivity patterns. Among the yeasts, Candida glabrata was strongly inhibited by the aqueous leaf extracts. Most of the strains were insensitive to the root extracts, although Enterococcus faecalis was inhibited by the root and not the leaf extracts.","PeriodicalId":6908,"journal":{"name":"Acta Alimentaria","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of the harvesting seasons on the polyphenol composition and antimicrobial activity of stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L.) extracts\",\"authors\":\"K. Kőszegi, Gy. Végvári, É. Stefanovits-Bányai, E. Békássy-Molnár, A. Maráz\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/066.2023.00156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of our research was to study the water and ethanol extractable polyphenols of stinging nettle ( Urtica dioica L.) harvested in different seasons and to determine their antimicrobial activity against certain human pathogenic and food spoiling bacteria and yeasts. Our results indicate that the spring leaf extracts had higher polyphenol contents than the root one; however, close to the end of the vegetation period these values decreased considerably in both leaves and roots. Detection and quantification of the most abundant phenolic compounds in the spring extracts by HPLC revealed the occurrence of 12 different phenol carboxylic acids and flavonoids. Flavonoid compounds were more abundant than phenol carboxylic acids in the leaves; however, their proportion was equal in the case of the roots. Nettle leaf extracts had remarkable antimicrobial activity, the spring extracts were more efficient than the autumn ones. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were sensitive to every leaf extract, while Listeria monocytogenes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa had reduced but remarkable sensitivity patterns. Among the yeasts, Candida glabrata was strongly inhibited by the aqueous leaf extracts. Most of the strains were insensitive to the root extracts, although Enterococcus faecalis was inhibited by the root and not the leaf extracts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Alimentaria\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Alimentaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/066.2023.00156\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Alimentaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/066.2023.00156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在研究不同季节采收的刺荨麻(Urtica dioica L.)水提物和乙醇提取物中的多酚类物质,并测定其对某些人类致病菌和食品腐败菌及酵母的抑菌活性。结果表明,春叶提取物的多酚含量高于根提取物;然而,在接近植被期结束时,这些值在叶和根中都显著下降。利用高效液相色谱法对春提取物中最丰富的酚类化合物进行检测和定量,发现存在12种不同的酚羧酸和黄酮类化合物。黄酮类化合物含量高于酚类羧酸;然而,在根的情况下,它们的比例是相等的。荨麻叶提取物具有显著的抑菌活性,春季提取物的抑菌活性高于秋季提取物。大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌对各叶提取物均有敏感性,单核增生李斯特菌和铜绿假单胞菌对各叶提取物的敏感性降低但显著。其中,叶片水提物对光念珠菌有较强的抑制作用。大多数菌株对根提取物不敏感,但粪肠球菌受到根而不是叶提取物的抑制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of the harvesting seasons on the polyphenol composition and antimicrobial activity of stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L.) extracts
Abstract The aim of our research was to study the water and ethanol extractable polyphenols of stinging nettle ( Urtica dioica L.) harvested in different seasons and to determine their antimicrobial activity against certain human pathogenic and food spoiling bacteria and yeasts. Our results indicate that the spring leaf extracts had higher polyphenol contents than the root one; however, close to the end of the vegetation period these values decreased considerably in both leaves and roots. Detection and quantification of the most abundant phenolic compounds in the spring extracts by HPLC revealed the occurrence of 12 different phenol carboxylic acids and flavonoids. Flavonoid compounds were more abundant than phenol carboxylic acids in the leaves; however, their proportion was equal in the case of the roots. Nettle leaf extracts had remarkable antimicrobial activity, the spring extracts were more efficient than the autumn ones. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were sensitive to every leaf extract, while Listeria monocytogenes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa had reduced but remarkable sensitivity patterns. Among the yeasts, Candida glabrata was strongly inhibited by the aqueous leaf extracts. Most of the strains were insensitive to the root extracts, although Enterococcus faecalis was inhibited by the root and not the leaf extracts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Alimentaria
Acta Alimentaria 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Alimentaria publishes original papers and reviews on food science (physics, physical chemistry, chemistry, analysis, biology, microbiology, enzymology, engineering, instrumentation, automation and economics of foods, food production and food technology, food quality, post-harvest treatments, food safety and nutrition).
期刊最新文献
Optimisation of microencapsulation efficiency of propolis phenolic compounds by double emulsion method using response surface methodology The effect of different non-Saccharomyces strains on the flavour characteristics of mead Determination of in vitro antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of Hypericum crenulatum against some food pathogens and its phenolic content Methods for experimental design, central composite design and the Box–Behnken design, to optimise operational parameters: A review Optimisation of ultrasonic-assisted hot-water extraction conditions of soluble dietary fibre from Lentinula edodes and analysis of its hypolipidaemic and anti-inflammatory properties in STZ-induced diabetic mice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1