人类世最好被理解为一个持续的、加剧的、非同步的事件

IF 2.4 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Boreas Pub Date : 2023-10-08 DOI:10.1111/bor.12636
Michael J. C. Walker, Andrew M. Bauer, Matthew Edgeworth, Erle C. Ellis, Stanley C. Finney, Philip L. Gibbard, Mark Maslin
{"title":"人类世最好被理解为一个持续的、加剧的、非同步的事件","authors":"Michael J. C. Walker,&nbsp;Andrew M. Bauer,&nbsp;Matthew Edgeworth,&nbsp;Erle C. Ellis,&nbsp;Stanley C. Finney,&nbsp;Philip L. Gibbard,&nbsp;Mark Maslin","doi":"10.1111/bor.12636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current debate on the status and character of the Anthropocene is focussed on whether this interval of geological time should be designated as a formal unit of epoch/series rank in the International Chronostratigraphic Chart/Geological Time Scale, or whether it is more appropriate for it to be considered as an informal ‘event’ comparable in significance with other major transformative events in deeper geological time. The case for formalizing the Anthropocene as a chronostratigraphical unit with a base at approximately 1950 CE is being developed by the Anthropocene Working Group of the Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy. Here we outline the alternative position and explain why the time-transgressive nature of human impact on global environmental systems that is reflected in the recent stratigraphical record means that the Anthropocene is better seen not as a series/epoch with a fixed lower boundary, but rather as an unfolding, transforming and intensifying geological event.</p>","PeriodicalId":9184,"journal":{"name":"Boreas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bor.12636","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Anthropocene is best understood as an ongoing, intensifying, diachronous event\",\"authors\":\"Michael J. C. Walker,&nbsp;Andrew M. Bauer,&nbsp;Matthew Edgeworth,&nbsp;Erle C. Ellis,&nbsp;Stanley C. Finney,&nbsp;Philip L. Gibbard,&nbsp;Mark Maslin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bor.12636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Current debate on the status and character of the Anthropocene is focussed on whether this interval of geological time should be designated as a formal unit of epoch/series rank in the International Chronostratigraphic Chart/Geological Time Scale, or whether it is more appropriate for it to be considered as an informal ‘event’ comparable in significance with other major transformative events in deeper geological time. The case for formalizing the Anthropocene as a chronostratigraphical unit with a base at approximately 1950 CE is being developed by the Anthropocene Working Group of the Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy. Here we outline the alternative position and explain why the time-transgressive nature of human impact on global environmental systems that is reflected in the recent stratigraphical record means that the Anthropocene is better seen not as a series/epoch with a fixed lower boundary, but rather as an unfolding, transforming and intensifying geological event.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Boreas\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bor.12636\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Boreas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bor.12636\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boreas","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bor.12636","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前关于 "人类世 "的地位和特征的争论集中在是否应将这一地质时间间隔指定为《国际年 代地层图/地质年代表》中的一个正式的纪元/系列等级单位,还是将其视为一个非正式的 "事 件 "更为合适,其重要性可与更深地质年代的其他重大变革事件相媲美。第四纪地层学小组委员会人类世工作组正在研究将人类世正式确定为一个年代地层单位,其基点约为公元 1950 年。在此,我们将概述另一种立场,并解释为什么人类对全球环境系统的影响具有时间上的跨越性,这反映在最近的地层记录中,这意味着人类世最好不要被视为一个具有固定下限的系列/时序,而应被视为一个正在展开、转变和加剧的地质事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Anthropocene is best understood as an ongoing, intensifying, diachronous event

Current debate on the status and character of the Anthropocene is focussed on whether this interval of geological time should be designated as a formal unit of epoch/series rank in the International Chronostratigraphic Chart/Geological Time Scale, or whether it is more appropriate for it to be considered as an informal ‘event’ comparable in significance with other major transformative events in deeper geological time. The case for formalizing the Anthropocene as a chronostratigraphical unit with a base at approximately 1950 CE is being developed by the Anthropocene Working Group of the Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy. Here we outline the alternative position and explain why the time-transgressive nature of human impact on global environmental systems that is reflected in the recent stratigraphical record means that the Anthropocene is better seen not as a series/epoch with a fixed lower boundary, but rather as an unfolding, transforming and intensifying geological event.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Boreas
Boreas 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Boreas has been published since 1972. Articles of wide international interest from all branches of Quaternary research are published. Biological as well as non-biological aspects of the Quaternary environment, in both glaciated and non-glaciated areas, are dealt with: Climate, shore displacement, glacial features, landforms, sediments, organisms and their habitat, and stratigraphical and chronological relationships. Anticipated international interest, at least within a continent or a considerable part of it, is a main criterion for the acceptance of papers. Besides articles, short items like discussion contributions and book reviews are published.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Temperature and palaeolake evolution during a Middle Pleistocene interglacial–glacial transition at the Palaeolithic locality of Schöningen, Germany The Lake Paravani archive – a contribution to the late Quaternary landscape evolution of the Lesser Caucasus (Georgia) Reconstructing the Holocene glacial history of northern Troms and western Finnmark, Arctic Norway Landsystem analysis of temperate non‐surging glaciers on the Mýrdalsjökull Ice Cap, southern Iceland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1