基于能力控制搜索算法的钢框架基于性能的设计优化:与基于力的设计方法的比较

IF 2.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structure and Infrastructure Engineering Pub Date : 2023-10-08 DOI:10.1080/15732479.2023.2263442
Hasan Eser, Oğuzhan Hasançebi, Ahmet Yakut, Saeed Gholizadeh
{"title":"基于能力控制搜索算法的钢框架基于性能的设计优化:与基于力的设计方法的比较","authors":"Hasan Eser, Oğuzhan Hasançebi, Ahmet Yakut, Saeed Gholizadeh","doi":"10.1080/15732479.2023.2263442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe capacity controlled search (CCS) method, which is a recently developed design-driven search algorithm, is implemented for performance-based design optimization (PBDO) of steel moment frames. It is shown that the CCS method is very suitable for PBDO problems since it can locate the optimum solution using a reasonable computational effort unlike metaheuristic search approaches, which often require thousands of structural analyses before converging to a near-optimum solution. Considering the fact that performance-based design (PBD) is a recently emerging design methodology, its comparison with the traditional force-based design (FBD) approach is also carried out extensively in this study. Accordingly, the optimum designs of the investigated steel frames produced according to both design methodologies using the CCS method are compared in terms of structural weight and seismic performance. Unlike most of the previous studies, not only inter-story drifts but also hinge rotation limits are considered as seismic performance criterion during PBDO process of steel moment frames. The numerical applications are presented using three ordinary moment resisting steel frames. It is shown that although the FBD methodology usually leads to heavier designs with respect to the PBD methodology, the optimum designs produced according to the former might fail to satisfy seismic performance requirements.Keywords: Capacity controlled searchcost-performance comparisondesign-driven searchdiscrete sizing optimizationforce-based designperformance-based designsteel moment framesstructural optimization Disclosure statementThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.","PeriodicalId":49468,"journal":{"name":"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance-based design optimization of steel moment frames using capacity controlled search algorithm: a comparison with force-based design approach\",\"authors\":\"Hasan Eser, Oğuzhan Hasançebi, Ahmet Yakut, Saeed Gholizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15732479.2023.2263442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThe capacity controlled search (CCS) method, which is a recently developed design-driven search algorithm, is implemented for performance-based design optimization (PBDO) of steel moment frames. It is shown that the CCS method is very suitable for PBDO problems since it can locate the optimum solution using a reasonable computational effort unlike metaheuristic search approaches, which often require thousands of structural analyses before converging to a near-optimum solution. Considering the fact that performance-based design (PBD) is a recently emerging design methodology, its comparison with the traditional force-based design (FBD) approach is also carried out extensively in this study. Accordingly, the optimum designs of the investigated steel frames produced according to both design methodologies using the CCS method are compared in terms of structural weight and seismic performance. Unlike most of the previous studies, not only inter-story drifts but also hinge rotation limits are considered as seismic performance criterion during PBDO process of steel moment frames. The numerical applications are presented using three ordinary moment resisting steel frames. It is shown that although the FBD methodology usually leads to heavier designs with respect to the PBD methodology, the optimum designs produced according to the former might fail to satisfy seismic performance requirements.Keywords: Capacity controlled searchcost-performance comparisondesign-driven searchdiscrete sizing optimizationforce-based designperformance-based designsteel moment framesstructural optimization Disclosure statementThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2023.2263442\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2023.2263442","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要针对钢刚架基于性能的优化设计,提出了一种新的设计驱动搜索算法——容量控制搜索(CCS)。研究表明,CCS方法非常适合PBDO问题,因为它可以使用合理的计算量找到最优解,而不像元启发式搜索方法,后者通常需要数千次结构分析才能收敛到接近最优解。考虑到基于性能的设计(PBD)是一种新兴的设计方法,本研究也将其与传统的基于力的设计(FBD)方法进行了广泛的比较。因此,根据使用CCS方法的两种设计方法,在结构重量和抗震性能方面比较了所调查钢框架的最佳设计。与以往的研究不同,本文不仅考虑了层间位移,还考虑了铰转角极限作为钢框架PBDO过程的抗震性能准则。给出了三种普通抗弯矩钢框架的数值应用。结果表明,虽然FBD方法通常会导致比PBD方法更重的设计,但根据前者产生的最佳设计可能无法满足抗震性能要求。关键词:容量控制搜索成本-性能比较设计驱动搜索离散尺寸优化基于力的设计基于性能的设计钢弯矩框架结构优化披露声明作者声明他们没有已知的竞争经济利益或个人关系可能会影响本文所报道的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance-based design optimization of steel moment frames using capacity controlled search algorithm: a comparison with force-based design approach
AbstractThe capacity controlled search (CCS) method, which is a recently developed design-driven search algorithm, is implemented for performance-based design optimization (PBDO) of steel moment frames. It is shown that the CCS method is very suitable for PBDO problems since it can locate the optimum solution using a reasonable computational effort unlike metaheuristic search approaches, which often require thousands of structural analyses before converging to a near-optimum solution. Considering the fact that performance-based design (PBD) is a recently emerging design methodology, its comparison with the traditional force-based design (FBD) approach is also carried out extensively in this study. Accordingly, the optimum designs of the investigated steel frames produced according to both design methodologies using the CCS method are compared in terms of structural weight and seismic performance. Unlike most of the previous studies, not only inter-story drifts but also hinge rotation limits are considered as seismic performance criterion during PBDO process of steel moment frames. The numerical applications are presented using three ordinary moment resisting steel frames. It is shown that although the FBD methodology usually leads to heavier designs with respect to the PBD methodology, the optimum designs produced according to the former might fail to satisfy seismic performance requirements.Keywords: Capacity controlled searchcost-performance comparisondesign-driven searchdiscrete sizing optimizationforce-based designperformance-based designsteel moment framesstructural optimization Disclosure statementThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
131
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Structure and Infrastructure Engineering - Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance is an international Journal dedicated to recent advances in maintenance, management and life-cycle performance of a wide range of infrastructures, such as: buildings, bridges, dams, railways, underground constructions, offshore platforms, pipelines, naval vessels, ocean structures, nuclear power plants, airplanes and other types of structures including aerospace and automotive structures. The Journal presents research and developments on the most advanced technologies for analyzing, predicting and optimizing infrastructure performance. The main gaps to be filled are those between researchers and practitioners in maintenance, management and life-cycle performance of infrastructure systems, and those between professionals working on different types of infrastructures. To this end, the journal will provide a forum for a broad blend of scientific, technical and practical papers. The journal is endorsed by the International Association for Life-Cycle Civil Engineering ( IALCCE) and the International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety ( IABMAS).
期刊最新文献
Vibration based dual-criteria damage detection method using deep neural networks in highway bridges with steel girders Numerical study on flexural behaviour of sulphate corroded RC beams strengthened with ultra-high-performance concrete A boosted deep learning-based approach for near real-time response estimation of structures under ground motion excitations Structural frequency-based maintenance management method for steel truss bridges under atmospheric corrosion Investigation of the time-dependent bearing capacities of concrete structures in different environments considering climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1