基于网络的精神分裂症家庭照护者社会心理干预的有效性:一项系统回顾

Watcharagan Kaewwanna, Patraporn Bhatarasakoon, Voranut Kitsumban
{"title":"基于网络的精神分裂症家庭照护者社会心理干预的有效性:一项系统回顾","authors":"Watcharagan Kaewwanna, Patraporn Bhatarasakoon, Voranut Kitsumban","doi":"10.60099/prijnr.2023.262390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internet-based interventions have long been available in mental health care, offering alternative options for caring for patients and caregivers. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of internet-based psychosocial interventions on psychological distress, caregiving burden, expressed emotion, knowledge about psychosis among family caregivers of people with schizophrenia, and hospitalization of the patients. A systematic search was conducted on June 20, 2022, in six databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest) from 2010 onwards in English and Thai. The review was conducted based on the JBI approach and reported following the PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42021255318. Five out of 20 studies were included in the review. Meta-analysis was impossible due to the methodological heterogeneity across the included studies; therefore, narrative synthesis was utilized. Psychological distress was not improved as reported in one study; however, the caregiving burden was improved in another study. Two studies reported expressed emotion; however, they were impossible to combine due to methodological differences, and the results contradicted each other. Knowledge about psychosis was also found to contradict results in two individual studies. Hospitalization was not impacted by the intervention based on one study. Four studies were randomized control trials, and another was a quasi-experimental research study. One out of four of the former did not mention blinding during randomization, which creates potential performance and detection bias. A robust randomized control trial should be carried out with a similar outcome measurement to decrease the heterogeneity and enhance the possibility for further meta-analysis and the ability to recommend for practice.","PeriodicalId":44649,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Internet-based Psychosocial Interventions among Family Caregivers of People with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Watcharagan Kaewwanna, Patraporn Bhatarasakoon, Voranut Kitsumban\",\"doi\":\"10.60099/prijnr.2023.262390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Internet-based interventions have long been available in mental health care, offering alternative options for caring for patients and caregivers. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of internet-based psychosocial interventions on psychological distress, caregiving burden, expressed emotion, knowledge about psychosis among family caregivers of people with schizophrenia, and hospitalization of the patients. A systematic search was conducted on June 20, 2022, in six databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest) from 2010 onwards in English and Thai. The review was conducted based on the JBI approach and reported following the PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42021255318. Five out of 20 studies were included in the review. Meta-analysis was impossible due to the methodological heterogeneity across the included studies; therefore, narrative synthesis was utilized. Psychological distress was not improved as reported in one study; however, the caregiving burden was improved in another study. Two studies reported expressed emotion; however, they were impossible to combine due to methodological differences, and the results contradicted each other. Knowledge about psychosis was also found to contradict results in two individual studies. Hospitalization was not impacted by the intervention based on one study. Four studies were randomized control trials, and another was a quasi-experimental research study. One out of four of the former did not mention blinding during randomization, which creates potential performance and detection bias. A robust randomized control trial should be carried out with a similar outcome measurement to decrease the heterogeneity and enhance the possibility for further meta-analysis and the ability to recommend for practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60099/prijnr.2023.262390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60099/prijnr.2023.262390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

长期以来,基于互联网的干预措施在精神卫生保健方面一直可用,为照顾患者和照顾者提供了替代选择。本研究旨在评估网络社会心理干预对精神分裂症患者家庭照顾者的心理困扰、照顾负担、情绪表达、精神疾病知识和患者住院治疗的影响。我们于2022年6月20日对6个数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Scopus、Cochrane Library和ProQuest)从2010年起的英文和泰文进行了系统检索。评估是根据JBI方法进行的,并按照PRISMA指南进行报告。该协议在PROSPERO中注册为CRD42021255318。20项研究中有5项纳入了综述。由于纳入研究的方法异质性,无法进行meta分析;因此,运用了叙事综合。一项研究报告称,心理困扰没有得到改善;然而,在另一项研究中,照顾负担得到了改善。两项研究报告了表达的情感;然而,由于方法的差异,它们无法结合起来,结果相互矛盾。关于精神病的知识也被发现与两项单独研究的结果相矛盾。根据一项研究,住院治疗不受干预措施的影响。4项研究为随机对照试验,1项为准实验研究。前者中有四分之一在随机化过程中没有提到盲法,这会产生潜在的性能和检测偏差。应该进行一项具有类似结果测量的可靠随机对照试验,以减少异质性,提高进一步荟萃分析的可能性和推荐实践的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Internet-based Psychosocial Interventions among Family Caregivers of People with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review
Internet-based interventions have long been available in mental health care, offering alternative options for caring for patients and caregivers. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of internet-based psychosocial interventions on psychological distress, caregiving burden, expressed emotion, knowledge about psychosis among family caregivers of people with schizophrenia, and hospitalization of the patients. A systematic search was conducted on June 20, 2022, in six databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest) from 2010 onwards in English and Thai. The review was conducted based on the JBI approach and reported following the PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42021255318. Five out of 20 studies were included in the review. Meta-analysis was impossible due to the methodological heterogeneity across the included studies; therefore, narrative synthesis was utilized. Psychological distress was not improved as reported in one study; however, the caregiving burden was improved in another study. Two studies reported expressed emotion; however, they were impossible to combine due to methodological differences, and the results contradicted each other. Knowledge about psychosis was also found to contradict results in two individual studies. Hospitalization was not impacted by the intervention based on one study. Four studies were randomized control trials, and another was a quasi-experimental research study. One out of four of the former did not mention blinding during randomization, which creates potential performance and detection bias. A robust randomized control trial should be carried out with a similar outcome measurement to decrease the heterogeneity and enhance the possibility for further meta-analysis and the ability to recommend for practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of the Nurse-led Self and Family Management Support Program among Adults with Early-stage Chronic Kidney Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial Effectiveness of the Protection Motivation Theory-based Education Program among People at Risk of Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial A Cross-sectional Study of Factors Affecting Quality of Life of People with Type 2 Diabetes Enhancing Health Literacy Through “I Watch Sodium” Application among Prehypertension University Staff: A Quasi-experimental Study Predicting Factors of Pre-coital and Sexual Behaviors among Thai Muslim Adolescents: A Cross-sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1