不同环境等级对半室外空间热舒适的影响

IF 0.8 0 ARCHITECTURE Japan Architectural Review Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1002/2475-8876.12414
Yuta Fukawa, Yuyuko Watanabe, Yutaro Ogawa, Ryo Hisayama, Akihisa Nomoto, Junta Nakano, Jun Nakagawa, Shin-ichi Tanabe
{"title":"不同环境等级对半室外空间热舒适的影响","authors":"Yuta Fukawa,&nbsp;Yuyuko Watanabe,&nbsp;Yutaro Ogawa,&nbsp;Ryo Hisayama,&nbsp;Akihisa Nomoto,&nbsp;Junta Nakano,&nbsp;Jun Nakagawa,&nbsp;Shin-ichi Tanabe","doi":"10.1002/2475-8876.12414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The introduction of semi-outdoor spaces to urban spaces and offices has increased in recent years. In previous studies, environmental grade has been defined as the level of control for the thermal environment set for an architectural space based on the use, where “semi-outdoor environment” is an environmental grade division that exists as a gradation between indoors and outdoors. This study aims to clarify effects of various environmental grades on thermal comfort. Field surveys were conducted in five semi-outdoor spaces in Tokyo from 9 to 25 September 2021, consisting of thermal environment measurement, questionnaires about thermal comfort and impression of surveyed spaces and real-time sensation voting. By impression evaluation and comparison of the regression curves of standard new effective temperature (SET*) against percentage of “uncomfortably warm,” the surveyed spaces were classified into two categories: “outdoor tendency” and “indoor tendency.” The difference in thermal comfort for the diverse semi-outdoor environment could be evaluated by the difference in spatial characteristics such as “sense of weight” of the top surface in addition to the difference in environment control. By regression analysis of real-time sensation voting result using hierarchical Bayesian approach, environmental grade was clarified to affect the correlation between pleasantness/unpleasantness and air velocity.</p>","PeriodicalId":42793,"journal":{"name":"Japan Architectural Review","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2475-8876.12414","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of various environmental grades on thermal comfort in semi-outdoor spaces\",\"authors\":\"Yuta Fukawa,&nbsp;Yuyuko Watanabe,&nbsp;Yutaro Ogawa,&nbsp;Ryo Hisayama,&nbsp;Akihisa Nomoto,&nbsp;Junta Nakano,&nbsp;Jun Nakagawa,&nbsp;Shin-ichi Tanabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/2475-8876.12414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The introduction of semi-outdoor spaces to urban spaces and offices has increased in recent years. In previous studies, environmental grade has been defined as the level of control for the thermal environment set for an architectural space based on the use, where “semi-outdoor environment” is an environmental grade division that exists as a gradation between indoors and outdoors. This study aims to clarify effects of various environmental grades on thermal comfort. Field surveys were conducted in five semi-outdoor spaces in Tokyo from 9 to 25 September 2021, consisting of thermal environment measurement, questionnaires about thermal comfort and impression of surveyed spaces and real-time sensation voting. By impression evaluation and comparison of the regression curves of standard new effective temperature (SET*) against percentage of “uncomfortably warm,” the surveyed spaces were classified into two categories: “outdoor tendency” and “indoor tendency.” The difference in thermal comfort for the diverse semi-outdoor environment could be evaluated by the difference in spatial characteristics such as “sense of weight” of the top surface in addition to the difference in environment control. By regression analysis of real-time sensation voting result using hierarchical Bayesian approach, environmental grade was clarified to affect the correlation between pleasantness/unpleasantness and air velocity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japan Architectural Review\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2475-8876.12414\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japan Architectural Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2475-8876.12414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Architectural Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2475-8876.12414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,在城市空间和办公室中引入半户外空间的情况有所增加。在以往的研究中,环境等级被定义为基于用途为建筑空间设定的热环境控制水平,其中“半室外环境”是一种环境等级划分,作为室内外之间的一种层次存在。本研究旨在阐明不同环境等级对热舒适的影响。研究人员于2021年9月9日至25日在东京的五个半室外空间进行了实地调查,包括热环境测量、热舒适问卷和对被调查空间的印象以及实时感觉投票。通过印象评价和标准新有效温度(SET*)与“不舒服的温暖”百分比的回归曲线比较,将调查空间分为两类:“室外倾向”和“室内倾向”。不同半室外环境的热舒适差异,除了环境控制的差异外,还可以通过顶面“重量感”等空间特征的差异来评价。利用层次贝叶斯方法对实时感觉投票结果进行回归分析,明确了环境等级对愉快/不愉快与空气速度之间的相关性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of various environmental grades on thermal comfort in semi-outdoor spaces

The introduction of semi-outdoor spaces to urban spaces and offices has increased in recent years. In previous studies, environmental grade has been defined as the level of control for the thermal environment set for an architectural space based on the use, where “semi-outdoor environment” is an environmental grade division that exists as a gradation between indoors and outdoors. This study aims to clarify effects of various environmental grades on thermal comfort. Field surveys were conducted in five semi-outdoor spaces in Tokyo from 9 to 25 September 2021, consisting of thermal environment measurement, questionnaires about thermal comfort and impression of surveyed spaces and real-time sensation voting. By impression evaluation and comparison of the regression curves of standard new effective temperature (SET*) against percentage of “uncomfortably warm,” the surveyed spaces were classified into two categories: “outdoor tendency” and “indoor tendency.” The difference in thermal comfort for the diverse semi-outdoor environment could be evaluated by the difference in spatial characteristics such as “sense of weight” of the top surface in addition to the difference in environment control. By regression analysis of real-time sensation voting result using hierarchical Bayesian approach, environmental grade was clarified to affect the correlation between pleasantness/unpleasantness and air velocity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of indoor microplastics in settled indoor house dust in single-person residential buildings in Japan An investigation of the effect of vibration duration on the evaluation of subjective responses to horizontal vibration Design process of the Memorial Cathedral for World Peace (1954), Hiroshima, by Togo Murano (Part 4): Formal manipulations observed in the process of working design and construction instruction of the cathedral (1948–1954) Communication behavior and space utilization of office workers in a research facility's activity-based workplace A new processing method of ground acceleration data for fast and accurate evaluation of maximum seismic structural response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1