从特权到权利:改变对巴西种族配额的看法

IF 2.1 2区 社会学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES Ethnic and Racial Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1080/01419870.2023.2277326
Camille Giraut
{"title":"从特权到权利:改变对巴西种族配额的看法","authors":"Camille Giraut","doi":"10.1080/01419870.2023.2277326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes how the implementation of affirmative action in Brazil has changed the way people, in particular potential beneficiaries of racial quotas, understand race, inequalities, and rights. Drawing on an original collection of essays written by low-income students in a college preparatory course in Rio de Janeiro, and comparing essays written nearly twenty years apart (2003 and 2022), it shows that potential beneficiaries have become more critical of the often-repeated notion that Brazil is a “racial democracy”. It also finds that, contrary to their 2003 counterparts, potential beneficiaries in 2022 rarely express fear that racial quotas would increase prejudice against black people. Finally, students in 2022 commonly describe racial quotas as a means of reparation and a right the state should protect, a framing nearly absent in 2003. These findings highlight the transformative potential of affirmative action in creating a new legal consciousness among historically stigmatized groups.","PeriodicalId":48345,"journal":{"name":"Ethnic and Racial Studies","volume":" 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From privileges to rights: changing perceptions of racial quotas in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Camille Giraut\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01419870.2023.2277326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes how the implementation of affirmative action in Brazil has changed the way people, in particular potential beneficiaries of racial quotas, understand race, inequalities, and rights. Drawing on an original collection of essays written by low-income students in a college preparatory course in Rio de Janeiro, and comparing essays written nearly twenty years apart (2003 and 2022), it shows that potential beneficiaries have become more critical of the often-repeated notion that Brazil is a “racial democracy”. It also finds that, contrary to their 2003 counterparts, potential beneficiaries in 2022 rarely express fear that racial quotas would increase prejudice against black people. Finally, students in 2022 commonly describe racial quotas as a means of reparation and a right the state should protect, a framing nearly absent in 2003. These findings highlight the transformative potential of affirmative action in creating a new legal consciousness among historically stigmatized groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnic and Racial Studies\",\"volume\":\" 7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnic and Racial Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2023.2277326\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnic and Racial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2023.2277326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了巴西平权行动的实施如何改变了人们,特别是种族配额的潜在受益者,理解种族、不平等和权利的方式。根据里约热内卢一所大学预科课程中低收入学生所写的论文的原始合集,并比较了相隔近20年(2003年和2022年)的论文,它表明潜在的受益者对巴西是一个“种族民主”这一经常被重复的概念变得更加批判。研究还发现,与2003年相比,2022年的潜在受益者很少担心种族配额会增加对黑人的偏见。最后,2022年的学生普遍将种族配额描述为一种补偿手段和国家应该保护的权利,这在2003年几乎是不存在的。这些发现突出了平权行动在历史上被污名化的群体中创造新的法律意识方面的变革潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From privileges to rights: changing perceptions of racial quotas in Brazil
This article analyzes how the implementation of affirmative action in Brazil has changed the way people, in particular potential beneficiaries of racial quotas, understand race, inequalities, and rights. Drawing on an original collection of essays written by low-income students in a college preparatory course in Rio de Janeiro, and comparing essays written nearly twenty years apart (2003 and 2022), it shows that potential beneficiaries have become more critical of the often-repeated notion that Brazil is a “racial democracy”. It also finds that, contrary to their 2003 counterparts, potential beneficiaries in 2022 rarely express fear that racial quotas would increase prejudice against black people. Finally, students in 2022 commonly describe racial quotas as a means of reparation and a right the state should protect, a framing nearly absent in 2003. These findings highlight the transformative potential of affirmative action in creating a new legal consciousness among historically stigmatized groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
258
期刊介绍: Race, ethnicity and nationalism are at the heart of many of the major social and political issues in the present global environment. New antagonisms have emerged which require a rethinking of traditional theoretical and empirical perspectives. Ethnic and Racial Studies, published ten times a year, is the leading journal for the analysis of these issues throughout the world. The journal provides an interdisciplinary academic forum for the presentation of research and theoretical analysis, drawing on sociology, social policy, anthropology, political science, economics, geography, international relations, history, social psychology and cultural studies.
期刊最新文献
Socialization, citizenship and the electoral integration of refugees: evidence from Sweden Police’s attribution of racial inequality in the criminal justice system: a case of non-binary color-blindness Geographies of race in Poland and Central and Eastern Europe Bye bye Moria: escape commons vs policies of military campization Gender segregation in the friendship networks of Muslim youth in Germany: the role of chastity norms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1