{"title":"拉康,影子女权主义,以及保罗·奥斯特的玻璃之城","authors":"Marcus Richey","doi":"10.1080/00111619.2023.2264173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay engages Paul Auster’s novel from 1985, City of Glass, with Lacan and feminism, in order to venture beyond the more business-as-usual formal aspects of postmodernism and propose that the ambiguous resistance of the text can be situated in a decidedly social and ideological context. The protagonist Daniel Quinn is presented as embarking upon a bewildering anti-detective odyssey that gives voice/language to a wish to confront, expose and pull down the traditional law-of-the-Father in order to clear the stage for what can or would come next. The Lucanian psychosexual rebirth of Quinn is followed through its stages (imaginary and symbolic), culminating in the blank white room of erasure at the end. Close attention is given to the enigmatic nature of the job Quinn accepts in the name of protecting the son from the father, seeing it as a repudiation of the fallacy of Peter Stillman Sr.’s wish to access the impossible realm of the real. The text’s unconscious, antisocial longing for the antidote to America’s deeply embedded patriarchal pathology is found in the mystical release of the lost Quinn into the very brickwork of the city, a baffling postmodern revolution in dream-mode, a shadow-feminism resistance through self-annihilation.","PeriodicalId":44131,"journal":{"name":"CRITIQUE-STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY FICTION","volume":"2005 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lacan, Shadow Feminism, and Paul Auster’s <i>City of Glass</i>\",\"authors\":\"Marcus Richey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00111619.2023.2264173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay engages Paul Auster’s novel from 1985, City of Glass, with Lacan and feminism, in order to venture beyond the more business-as-usual formal aspects of postmodernism and propose that the ambiguous resistance of the text can be situated in a decidedly social and ideological context. The protagonist Daniel Quinn is presented as embarking upon a bewildering anti-detective odyssey that gives voice/language to a wish to confront, expose and pull down the traditional law-of-the-Father in order to clear the stage for what can or would come next. The Lucanian psychosexual rebirth of Quinn is followed through its stages (imaginary and symbolic), culminating in the blank white room of erasure at the end. Close attention is given to the enigmatic nature of the job Quinn accepts in the name of protecting the son from the father, seeing it as a repudiation of the fallacy of Peter Stillman Sr.’s wish to access the impossible realm of the real. The text’s unconscious, antisocial longing for the antidote to America’s deeply embedded patriarchal pathology is found in the mystical release of the lost Quinn into the very brickwork of the city, a baffling postmodern revolution in dream-mode, a shadow-feminism resistance through self-annihilation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CRITIQUE-STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY FICTION\",\"volume\":\"2005 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CRITIQUE-STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY FICTION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2023.2264173\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRITIQUE-STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY FICTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2023.2264173","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文将保罗·奥斯特(Paul Auster) 1985年的小说《玻璃之城》(City of Glass)与拉康和女权主义结合在一起,目的是冒险超越后现代主义更为常规的正式方面,并提出文本的模糊抵抗可以被置于一个明确的社会和意识形态背景中。主角丹尼尔·奎因(Daniel Quinn)开始了一段令人困惑的反侦探之旅,他希望通过声音和语言来对抗、揭露和推翻传统的天父法则,以便为接下来可能发生的事情扫清道路。奎因的卢卡尼亚性心理重生经历了它的各个阶段(想象的和象征的),在最后的空白房间里达到高潮。奎因以保护儿子不受父亲伤害的名义接受了这份工作,并将其视为对老彼得·斯蒂尔曼(Peter Stillman Sr.)希望进入不可能的现实领域的谬论的否定,这一工作的神秘性受到了密切关注。文本无意识地,反社会地渴望解药,以解决美国根深蒂固的父权病态,这体现在迷失的奎因神秘地被释放到城市的砖墙中,这是一场令人困惑的后现代革命,是一场通过自我毁灭进行的影子女权主义抵抗。
Lacan, Shadow Feminism, and Paul Auster’s City of Glass
This essay engages Paul Auster’s novel from 1985, City of Glass, with Lacan and feminism, in order to venture beyond the more business-as-usual formal aspects of postmodernism and propose that the ambiguous resistance of the text can be situated in a decidedly social and ideological context. The protagonist Daniel Quinn is presented as embarking upon a bewildering anti-detective odyssey that gives voice/language to a wish to confront, expose and pull down the traditional law-of-the-Father in order to clear the stage for what can or would come next. The Lucanian psychosexual rebirth of Quinn is followed through its stages (imaginary and symbolic), culminating in the blank white room of erasure at the end. Close attention is given to the enigmatic nature of the job Quinn accepts in the name of protecting the son from the father, seeing it as a repudiation of the fallacy of Peter Stillman Sr.’s wish to access the impossible realm of the real. The text’s unconscious, antisocial longing for the antidote to America’s deeply embedded patriarchal pathology is found in the mystical release of the lost Quinn into the very brickwork of the city, a baffling postmodern revolution in dream-mode, a shadow-feminism resistance through self-annihilation.
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in the 1950s, Critique has consistently identified the most notable novelists of our time. In the pages of Critique appeared the first authoritative discussions of Bellow and Malamud in the ''50s, Barth and Hawkes in the ''60s, Pynchon, Elkin, Vonnegut, and Coover in the ''70s; DeLillo, Atwood, Morrison, and García Márquez in the ''80s; Auster, Amy Tan, David Foster Wallace, and Nurrudin Farah in the ''90s; and Lorrie Moore and Mark Danielewski in the new century. Readers go to Critique for critical essays on new authors with emerging reputations, but the general focus of the journal is fiction after 1950 from any country. Critique is published five times a year.