形成性评价中的学习分析:系统的文献综述

Ke ZHANG, Ramazan YILMAZ, Ahmet Berk USTUN, Fatma Gizem KARAOĞLAN YILMAZ
{"title":"形成性评价中的学习分析:系统的文献综述","authors":"Ke ZHANG, Ramazan YILMAZ, Ahmet Berk USTUN, Fatma Gizem KARAOĞLAN YILMAZ","doi":"10.21031/epod.1272054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This systematic review examines the use of learning analytics (LA) in formative assessment (FA). LA is a powerful tool that can support FA by providing real-time feedback to students and teachers. The review analyzes studies published on Web of Science and Scopus databases between 2011 and 2022 that provide an overview of the current state of published research on the use of LA for FA in diverse learning environments and through different delivery modes. This review also explores the significant potential of LA in FA practices in digital learning. A total of 63 studies met all selection criteria and were fully reviewed by conducting multiple analyses including selected bibliometrics, a categorical meta-trends analysis and inductive content analysis. The results indicate that the number of LA in FA studies has experienced a significant surge over the past decade. The results also show the current state of research on LA in FA, through a range of disciplines, journals, research methods, learning environments and delivery modes. This review can help inform the implementation of LA in educational contexts to support effective FA practices. However, the review also highlights the need for further research.","PeriodicalId":43015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology-EPOD","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning analytics in formative assessment: A systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Ke ZHANG, Ramazan YILMAZ, Ahmet Berk USTUN, Fatma Gizem KARAOĞLAN YILMAZ\",\"doi\":\"10.21031/epod.1272054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This systematic review examines the use of learning analytics (LA) in formative assessment (FA). LA is a powerful tool that can support FA by providing real-time feedback to students and teachers. The review analyzes studies published on Web of Science and Scopus databases between 2011 and 2022 that provide an overview of the current state of published research on the use of LA for FA in diverse learning environments and through different delivery modes. This review also explores the significant potential of LA in FA practices in digital learning. A total of 63 studies met all selection criteria and were fully reviewed by conducting multiple analyses including selected bibliometrics, a categorical meta-trends analysis and inductive content analysis. The results indicate that the number of LA in FA studies has experienced a significant surge over the past decade. The results also show the current state of research on LA in FA, through a range of disciplines, journals, research methods, learning environments and delivery modes. This review can help inform the implementation of LA in educational contexts to support effective FA practices. However, the review also highlights the need for further research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology-EPOD\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology-EPOD\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1272054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology-EPOD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1272054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这个系统的回顾检查了学习分析(LA)在形成性评估(FA)中的使用。LA是一个强大的工具,可以通过向学生和老师提供实时反馈来支持FA。该综述分析了2011年至2022年间发表在Web of Science和Scopus数据库上的研究,概述了在不同学习环境中通过不同交付模式使用LA进行FA的已发表研究的现状。这篇综述还探讨了在数字化学习的FA实践中LA的巨大潜力。共有63项研究符合所有选择标准,并通过多种分析进行全面审查,包括选定的文献计量学、分类元趋势分析和归纳内容分析。结果表明,FA研究中LA的数量在过去十年中经历了显著的激增。研究结果还从学科、期刊、研究方法、学习环境和交付模式等方面显示了FA中LA的研究现状。这篇综述可以帮助告知在教育背景下LA的实施,以支持有效的FA实践。然而,该综述也强调了进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learning analytics in formative assessment: A systematic literature review
This systematic review examines the use of learning analytics (LA) in formative assessment (FA). LA is a powerful tool that can support FA by providing real-time feedback to students and teachers. The review analyzes studies published on Web of Science and Scopus databases between 2011 and 2022 that provide an overview of the current state of published research on the use of LA for FA in diverse learning environments and through different delivery modes. This review also explores the significant potential of LA in FA practices in digital learning. A total of 63 studies met all selection criteria and were fully reviewed by conducting multiple analyses including selected bibliometrics, a categorical meta-trends analysis and inductive content analysis. The results indicate that the number of LA in FA studies has experienced a significant surge over the past decade. The results also show the current state of research on LA in FA, through a range of disciplines, journals, research methods, learning environments and delivery modes. This review can help inform the implementation of LA in educational contexts to support effective FA practices. However, the review also highlights the need for further research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Learning analytics in formative assessment: A systematic literature review Analysis of Peer and Self-Assessments Using the Many-facet Rasch Measurement Model and Student Opinions Ability Estimation with Polytomous Items in Computerized Multistage Tests Investigation of The Measurement Invariance of Affective Characteristics Related to TIMSS 2019 Mathematics Achievement by Gender A Bibliometric Analysis on Power Analysis Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1